[Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

The most numerous and, collectively, the most powerful form of government on earth is the family. This is why worldly governments are so obsessed with destroying and undermining families.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer » Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:50 pm

Title IV-D Hit em' where it hurts -

Image
Brick Layer wrote:
Mon Sep 09, 2019 1:31 am
https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title11/1115.htm
DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS
Social Security Law
SEC. 1115. [42 U.S.C. 1315] (a) In the case of any experimental, pilot, or demonstration project which, in the judgment of the Secretary, is likely to assist in promoting the objectives of title.... or part A or D of title IV, in a State or States—
The state voluntarily entered into an agreement with the Child Support Enforcement Program (with three demonstration projects in relation to child support – Title 19 to recover birth expenses, 402 to recover TANF, Child and Spousal Support Program). The state plan for child and spousal support Sec. 454. [42 U.S.C. 654] is a demonstration project SEC. 1115. [42 U.S.C. 1315] (a)(1) see, 454 “....and for the period he finds necessary to enable such State or States to carry out such project,”.
SEC. 1115. [42 U.S.C. 1315] (a)(4) A demonstration project under this subsection may be commenced any time after September 30, 1990, and shall be conducted for such period of time as the agreement with the Secretary may provide; except that, in no event may a demonstration project under this section be conducted after September 30, 1995.

The Title IV-D Program (child support enforcement program) a demonstration project ended in 1995.
Image

Darren Edward's facebook post regarding the "Child Support Game Over" Book.
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... =3&theater
Child Support Game Over.JPG
Sam R & Troy Alexander
Child Support Game Over.JPG (2.84 MiB) Viewed 662 times
https://csgameover.com/shop/index.php

https://www.suijurisforum.com/child-sup ... t7195.html
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer » Sat Sep 21, 2019 3:56 pm

Brick Layer wrote:
Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:50 pm
Title IV-D Hit em' where it hurts -
Funding!!!

States getting paid through the office of child support enforcement a pass-through entity:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/75.333
45 CFR § 75.333 - HHS awarding agency or pass-through entity review.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/75.2
45 CFR § 75.2- Definitions
Pass-through entity means a non-Federal entity that provides a subaward to a subrecipient to carry out part of a Federal program. The subrecipient in a friend of the court case the county is receiving subawards through the child support agency a pass-through entity because they are a non-federal entity. The office of child support enforcement are the ones who are contracted directly to the counties, they are transferring money to that county as a pass-through entity because they are a non-federal entity. The circuit court chief judge is under contract with the Office of Child Support Enforcement and is working for the central registry for the Hague convention (an international tribunal that operates under international law); anyone contracted with the office of child support enforcement is not representing the state because they are operating international law, they are not courts of law but instead international tribunals.

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/f ... _guide.pdf
Hague Child Support Convention: Judicial Guide • Chapter Two
Central Authority: The Central Authority is the public body designated to carry out the duties of administrative cooperation and assistance under the Convention (§ 701(2) UIFSA 2008). The U.S. Central Authority is the Department of Health and Human Services, and the Secretary of HHS is authorized and empowered to perform all lawful acts as may be necessary to execute the functions of the Central Authority [Executive Order 13752, 81 Fed. Reg. 90,181 (Dec. 8, 2016)]. The Secretary has, in turn, delegated responsibility to the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE) as the entity within HHS which serves as the Central Authority [42 U.S.C. § 659a and Executive Order 13752, 81 Fed. Reg. 90,181 (Dec. 8, 2016)]. OCSE has, in turn, designated state IV-D agencies as “public bodies” to perform the majority of specific Central Authority functions under Convention Article 6, which are case processing functions [6 Notice Designating State Title IV-D Child Support Agencies as ‘‘Public Bodies,’’ 82 Fed. Reg. 850 (Jan. 4, 2017), https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-0 ... -31895.pdf.].

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/f ... _guide.pdf
Hague Child Support Convention: Judicial Guide • Chapter One
1.3 Implementing the Convention in the U.S.
As noted earlier, the Convention is unusual in that it is implemented in the U.S.
through state law. UIFSA 2008 is that law. [Implementing a treaty in all 50 states using the Uniform Law Commission which is an unincorporated association of business that drafted the legislation for the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act and which was approved by the American Bar Association; not approved by congress.

https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/f ... _guide.pdf
Hague Child Support Convention: Judicial Guide • Chapter One
1.1 Purpose of this Guide
Although treaties are generally implemented through federal
legislation, as family law is traditionally a state matter, the Convention was implemented
in the U.S. through state law, the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (UIFSA) 2008
[Battle Rankin Robinson, “The Beginner’s Guide to International Support,” 33 Delaware Lawyer 22 (Winter 2015/2016) at 23].

To ensure consistent application of the Convention, Congress directed that all states
enact UIFSA 2008 [Subsection 301(f)(3)(A) of Pub. L. 113-183, the Preventing Sex Trafficking and Strengthening Families Act of 2014 (hereinafter referred to as the Strengthening Families Act)].

Once every U.S. state had enacted UIFSA 2008, the President signed the U.S. instrument of ratification and deposited this instrument on September 7, 2016, with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, depository for the Hague Conference.
UIFSA has been the state law governing intergovernmental child support since the “Welfare Reform” federal legislation in 1996 required that all states enact the 1996 version of the uniform state law [The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA), in section 321, amended 42 U.S.C. § 666 to add a new subsection (f) requiring all states to enact UIFSA 1996 by January 1, 1998. See Pub. L. 104-193, 110 Stat. 2105 (1996). UIFSA was first developed in 1992, but at that time there was no requirement that states enact it. It was amended in 1996]. The UIFSA 2008 amendments integrate the appropriate provisions of the Convention into state law and enhance the handling of all international cases.

UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 255 of 2015
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(jsi1jyelvmclbwqpeadm51wj))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-255-2015-1

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/301.1
45 CFR § 301.1 - General definitions.
Office means the [federal] Office of Child Support Enforcement which is the separate organizational unit within the Department with the responsibility for the administration of the program under this title [Title 45 is not voluntary (DHHS via treaty to administer has an obligation (substantial compliance with the requirements is expected, Twaddell v. Anderson, 523 S.E.2d 710 (N.C. App. 1999); In re Chapman, 973 S.W.2d 346 (Tex. App. 1998.)) and not Title IV-D of the Social Security Act which is voluntary state participation].
The ‘Office of Child Support Enforcement’ is not an executive agency and does not have a cooperative agreement because it is a separate organizational unit, separate from the Federal Government.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/31/6305
31 U.S. Code § 6305. Using cooperative agreements applies only to an executive agency
Only applies to executive agency, Health And Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, etc. HHS Grant-Awarding Operating Divisions (OPDIVs); the office of child support is not listed as an HHS awarding agency because it is a separate organizational unit not an executive agency of the federal government. The cooperative agreements do not create a relationship between the United States Government and the County.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/302.12
45 CFR § 302.12 - Single and separate organizational unit.
The State plan shall provide for the establishment or designation of [state office of child support enforcement] a single and separate [seperate from the government] organizational unit to administer the IV-D plan.

The county 'Office of Child Support Enforcement' is a separate organizational unit a part of what is called the Hague Child Support Convention, the office of child support enforcement they are the central authority for the Hague Convention. Central registry means a single unit or office within the State IV-D agency which receives, disseminates and has oversight responsibility for processing incoming interstate IV-D cases, including UIFSA petitions and requests for wage withholding in IV-D cases and, at the option of the State, intrastate IV-D cases. Office means the Office of Child Support Enforcement which is the separate organizational unit within the Department with the responsibility for the administration of the program under this title. [45 CFR § 301.1] PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW (Hague Child Support Convention: Judicial Guide https://www.acf.hhs.gov/css/resource/ha ... cial-guide) the United States is foreign to the Hague and that private international law.

The Office of Child Support Enforcement https://www.acf.hhs.gov/css/partners/international
contracts directly to the county and they create a central registry in that county; That central registry the Office of Child Support Enforcement central also contracts on behalf of the courts and they also contract with the judge surrogate that is why the federal child support manual says that these cannot be judges of the court because they are a private international tribunal. The United States is a foreign country to the Hague, 45 CFR 301.1 definition of “State”: State means the several States (listed and separated by commas) and does NOT mean the 50 States of the United States nor Michigan see Hauge Child Support Convention Judicial Guide Chapter Two ““State” is used to refer to a country or sovereign State, not to a sub-unit of a country such as a state within the U.S., or a Canadian province or territory. A country that has ratified, accepted, or approved the Convention is also called a Contracting State or a Convention country.” The county is acting as a foreign reciprocating country (FRC) operating a foreign program on U.S. soil; Section 459A(d) of the Social Security Act permits states to enter into reciprocal arrangements with countries that are not the subject of a federal declaration. Federal bilateral arrangements take precedence over any state reciprocal arrangement. At the state level, this is implemented through § 308(b) UIFSA (2008). A similar provision was in the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, the 1968 precursor to UIFSA.

UNIFORM INTERSTATE FAMILY SUPPORT ACT (EXCERPT)
Act 255 of 2015
http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(jsi1jyelvmclbwqpeadm51wj))/mileg.aspx?page=getObject&objectName=mcl-255-2015-1

EVERY COUNTY ...a foreign reciprocating country!!!


🚩 "Flag on the play!!!" The Child Support Enforcement Program is being implemented under the guise of Title IV-D without full disclosure(s) being made to American families; the fact the Child Support Enforcement Progam merely treaty implemented by the state(s)!

U.S. Constitution Article I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei
Section 10.
No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.
No state shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection laws: and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any state on imports or exports, shall be for the use of the treasury of the United States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of the Congress.
No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.

THE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Unconstitutional, 'Private International Law' --
...it's still ALL based on consent!!!

Image

"In exercising its positive Commerce Clause power, “Congress has often passed legislation to help the States solve problems that defy local solution.” Sage, 92 F.3d at 105."
Image

"It is important to note that such an agreement between the parties in the U.S. would be treated as a contract" Hague Convention

When PUSH COMES TO SHOVE - eh The U.S. Constitution is the foundation of the united states federal government including the federal judiciary... the federal courts would be hard-pressed to rule treaty over constitution (constitution vs. treaty); the Hague Child Support Convention 'treaty' interjecting private international law into and or onto American families.

Understanding UISFA and that it is NOT Child Support
[Use hyperlink above -- image below is not a video!]
Image
Last edited by Brick Layer on Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer » Sat Sep 21, 2019 7:38 pm

Brick Layer wrote:
Sat Sep 21, 2019 3:56 pm
🚩 "Flag on the play!!!" The Child Support Enforcement Program is being implemented under the guise of Title IV-D without full disclosure(s) being made to American families; the fact the Child Support Enforcement Progam merely treaty implemented And/Or entered into by the state(s)!!!

U.S. Constitution Article I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei
Section 10.
No state shall enter into any treaty...


The U.S. Constitution is the foundation of the united states federal government including the federal judiciary... the federal courts would be hard-pressed to rule treaty over constitution (constitution vs. treaty); the Hague Child Support Convention 'treaty' interjecting private international law into and or onto American families.

constitution vs. treaty

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=8&v=E5ANJghvoEA
Post Reply