Judeo-Christian

Comprehending laws and contracts is impossible, unless we first learn the meaning of the words and phrases they contain.

Moderator: notmartha

Post Reply
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Judeo-Christian

Post by notmartha »

Jewish Claim: “We Control The Narrative. We Change The Bible.” Why Do Churches Trust Them?
One by one, some churchgoers are finally taking Bible study seriously. Instead of listening exclusively to church leaders, they are personally taking responsibility to look into and examine the actual Word of God to see what it really says – and this requires looking into the Greek and Hebrew texts. This can be done with the help of modern interlinears and lexicons available in books as well as on the internet. One of the first things you’ll find is that the English translations (like the KJV) are not accurate. You need accuracy when you look into the Holy Word Of God!

Sincere seekers of truth are soon asking, “How did the churches end up with such perverted an inaccurate teachings and translations? Why do the churches, and their Bible VERSIONS, have so many things in common with known pagan teachings? Who are those “experts” who have established “orthodox” and accepted inaccurate and nonsensical doctrines – crazy teachings like God’s home being in outer space, and a being called “Satan” who is supernatural and powerful, and a “burning hell” where all sinners will be tortured for ever? With the churches teaching this kind of nonsense it is no wonder most people assume that the Bible is ridiculous. It is sad because it is not the Bible that teaches these things, but it is the churches and the synagogues that teach the nonsense.

The church ministers are certainly guilty of promoting bad translations and bad doctrines. They hold themselves out to be God’s representatives. They evoke the trust of their congregations. But they only parrot (repeat) nonsense they hear and read from other so-called “experts.” They have trusted lying sources and then repeated those lies to their congregations.

Repeating lies to people who come to them for truth is a grievous sin for which church leaders are guilty and God holds them responsible. But from where, or from who, do church pastors learn their nutty doctrine that they pass on to their congregations?

8. This people draws near to Me with their mouth, and honors me with their lips; but their heart is far from Me.

9. But in vain they worship Me, teaching for doctrine the precepts of men.

Mtt. 15:8-9

Indeed, Bible students have not only the right, but the obligation, to ask these questions. After all, the Holy Scriptures are the God-breathed inspired messages He wants us to know. These are the words of life. So if we want to have life we must have access to these words of God – and we need to know them accurately. Nothing is more important to us! NOTHING! So, yes, we must know the truth. And that means we must ask the questions and not settle for silly answers.

Here’s the thing. Churches teach doctrines that are NOT from the Bible. Doctrines attributed to God, but are not from God. Instead they come from the precepts of men. So who are these men who invent false doctrine?

Did you know that church religion is officially called “Judeo-Christian?” Churches stupidly admit their religion has a Jewish source. They teach that Christ-hating Jewish rabbis are the acknowledged experts on the Bible. In matters of doctrine or interpreting the Bible, churches always rely on Jewish “wisdom.” Church theologians rely on Jewish interpretation. Churches teach their congregations that [modern day] Jews are Israelites descended of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But that is A LIE! [Modern day] Jews are not [generally] Israelites. They are not even Semites. They are of Persian descent and came from Persia when King Cyrus allowed Ezra and Nehemiah to lead a group of people out of Persia to settle in Judea.

Along with that group of Israelites who followed Ezra and Nehemiah was a MIXED MULTITUDE (Nehemiah 13). That “mixed multitude” were not Israelites. They were Persians (Zoroastrians) [mongrels] and they fought against the true Israelites. Nehemiah tells how he commanded the Israelites to separate from the Zoroastrian Persians. The Israelites who had married Persians were commanded to separate from them.

Ezra explains in chapters 4, 9 & 10 how Ezra and Nehemiah struggled against the Persian strangers (the “mixed multitude”) that became known later as “Jews.”

The Persians claimed to be Israelites (later under Roman rule these Persians [Zoroastrians] were called “Judeans.” The label “Jew” did not come from the Hebrew “Judah” but rather from the Roman name “Judea.” These non-Israelite Persians were the “Jews” that fought against Jesus and murdered Him). These are the “Jews” that churches tell us are Israelites – in spite of the fact that the Persian Parsees (i.e. the Zoroastrians) were the Persian haters of Christ and the main persecutors of the followers of Jesus. They are the ones who killed Stephen, murdered Jesus, and chased his disciples out of Judea. So they left Jewish-occupied Jerusalem and went elsewhere to find the scattered “lost sheep” of Israel.

The churches claim to trust and believe in Christ, and at the same time they honor and follow the Persian Pharisees (the killers of Jesus and persecutors of the apostles). The churches promote the Jews’ Persian religion. They even claim that Jesus was a Jew – which is a horrendous insult.

Jesus unmasked the Jews when He said:

19. Then said they (the Pharisees) to Him (Jesus), Where is your Father? Jesus answered, You neither know Me, nor my Father: if you had known Me, you would have known my Father also.

39. They answered and said to Him, Abraham is our father. Jesus said to them, If you were Abraham’s children you would do the works of Abraham.

40. But now you seek to kill Me, a man that has told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this is not from Abraham.

41. You do the deeds of your father …

44. You are of your father the devil (the enemy – i.e., Pharisee religion), and the lusts of your father you do.

47. He that is of God hears the words of God: you therefore hear them not, because you are not of God.

John 8:19-47

The Pharisees were Persian Zoroastrians, called “Parsees.” “Parsees” are practitioners of Persian Zoroastrianism (the religion of Babylon). “Parsees” became “Pharisees” and laid claim on the label of “Jew” (Gk. “Judean”). It is from Zoroastrianism that originated the ungodly teaching of an ever-burning hell fire punishment the churches and Judaism calls “hell.” Churches teach this ungodly doctrine. If churches can’t get any of this right, how can anyone trust them to get anything right?

Listen to the above clip of Rabbi David Blumofe as he explains (brags) that Judaism is identical to original Pharisaism – the religion and people who hated and murdered Christ. He explains that Jewish Rabbis CHANGE the Scripture when they want – because it is their duty! Instead of Scripture they follow the Babylonian Talmud- the infamous document that blasphemes Jesus.

Their “changed/altered Scripture” is the blatant nonsense that the church pastors feed their congregations. Pharisaism (Judaism/Persian paganism) was the matrix from which grew Judaism. And from that came also the Roman church system – called “Judeo-Christianity.” From that was created a whole industry of corrupted and confused churches. Churchgoers are products of the perverted minds of Judaism, pagan myth, and all kinds of perversion.

The churches (and churchgoers) don’t take their faith seriously enough to even look into the question. How could it be possible that the foremost haters of Christ could be considered a reliable source for God’s truth? Why do churches and churchgoers turn to liars for their doctrine? Why do they call their industry “Judeo-Christianity”?

Who are you trusting? Who were the original perverters of Christ’s gospel? Who are the anti-Christs and corrupters of God’s Word? How can we trust what is presented in the churches and in the church-sanctioned “VERSIONS” of the Bible like the King James Version that has adopted propaganda from the Pharisees? King James was the head of the Church of England which was an offshoot of the Church of Rome – the product of Roman Emperor Constantine. Do you think James was trustworthy to produce the English version of God’s Word?

If you care enough to seek truth, you’d better get to work and take seriously your Bible study. Seek truth – not religion. Ask questions. Find reliable, or at least honest, Bible research.

God’s word is TRUTH. You can find truth – but not in church! It requires that you put actual effort into it. You won’t find truth in the temples of the “mixed multitude.” They are liars and anti-Christs. Trust God’s Word, not churches.
From: https://benwilliamslibrary.com/blog/?p=10078

Words in [brackets] are mine.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by Firestarter »

notmartha wrote: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:01 pmOnce again, Ben Williams says it way better than me..
This is a mixed up mess that doesn't show that "Judeo-Christianity" is an "oxymoron". Here he admits that it's "the official label"...
notmartha wrote: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:01 pmDid you know that the official label for church religion is “Judeo-Christian?” Churches proudly claim the Jewish source for their religion.
.
Ben Williams goes into a rant about how bad the "Christian" church is. Obviously I agree (at least in part).

Here's information on how the New Testament was changed by the Catholic church, since the 4th century AD, when it was founded by the Sun-Worshipping satanist, Roman Emperor Constantine, until the 16th century.
Firestarter wrote: Fri Dec 13, 2019 4:48 pmVatican corrections – 1562, 1587
In 1562, the Vatican established the censoring unit called Index Expurgatorius. Its purpose was to delete "erroneous passages of the early Church Fathers" that opposed “modern-day” doctrine. When Vatican archivists came across, "genuine copies of the Fathers, they corrected them according to the Expurgatory Index".
In 1587, Pope Sixtus V (1585-90) established an official Vatican publishing division and explained "Church history will be now be established ... we shall seek to print our own account".

Professor Edmond S. Bordeaux in “How The Great Pan Died” wrote:
The Church ante-dated all her late works, some newly made, some revised and some counterfeited, which contained the final expression of her history ... her technique was to make it appear that much later works written by Church writers were composed a long time earlier, so that they might become evidence of the first, second or third centuries.
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=745&start=60
.

But you can't have it both ways Ben! Williams on the one hand tells us to study the Bible, but on the other hand admits that the Bible is corrupted, see below even arguing that the "Christ" of the New Testament is really "Mithras"...
notmartha wrote: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:01 pmTheir “changed/altered Scripture” is the nonsense that the churches rely upon.
.

The following is interesting, but contradicts the Bible (and ignores the Ashkenazi Khazar "Jews")...
Sort of like the word "Jew" is an "oxymoron", if "Jews" aren't "Israelites" than what is "Judeo"?!? "Jews" were originally nothing more or less than the English word for of/from the Kingdom of Judah.
notmartha wrote: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:01 pmChurches teach their congregations that Jews are Israelite descendants of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. But that is A LIE! Jews are not Israelites. They are of Persian descent and came from Persia when King Cyrus sent Persian settlers to Judea.
Here's the definition (or 2 definitions in the Bible, both OT and NT) of the word "Jew", according to Notmartha (according to the Tanach, Jews are descendants of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin), and also the definition of "Israelites" (the 12 tribes that are actually 13): viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1376

.
notmartha wrote: Sat Dec 11, 2021 2:01 pmGod’s word is TRUTH. You can find truth – but not in church! It requires that you put actual effort into it. You won’t find truth in the churches. They are sold out to liars and anti-Christs. Trust God’s Word, not churches.
So where can I find "God’s Word"?!? The Old Testament was a new translation of the Hebrew (Jewish) Tanach, and the New Testament was a newly compiled book that included a "Jesus Christ" that was a mixture of Joshua of Nazareth (the Son of Man), and some myths on demi-gods (like Mithras)... according to Ben Williams!
I can't find the (original) Scripture because it was "changed/altered" by "Jews" that aren't "Israelites" (according to Williams!)?!?


In another newsletter, our resident fan Notmartha posted, Ben Williams argued that the "Christ" of the New Testament is really "Mithras". So where does this leave us Ben?!? If the "Christ" of the New Testament is really "Mithras" where do I find this "Christ" that we should follow, according to the same Williams?!?
.
Constantine's faith was Mithraism, which he renamed "Christianity" and gave state sanction to it as a religious institution.
(...)
Constantine was a Sun-worshipping follower of the Persian saviour Mithras. He simply relabeled Mithras as Christ, this making Mihtraism the state religion of the entire Roman Empire. This Roman Catholicism was what most people called "Christian" ... but as you can see it was not Christian. It was/is Mithraism.
viewtopic.php?p=2738#p2738


I once spoke to a Jewish woman born in Portugal, who tried to convince me that her religion is superior. One of the things she said: "His name wasn't even 'Jesus Christus'" (what's with this disgusting English habit of translating Latin names?)!
Were the followers of Joshua of Nazareth even called "Christians", before Roman Emperor Constantine perverted His teachings to destroy His following from the inside?


How can I have faith (the size of a mustard seed), if I don't know who (or what) to believe? Or maybe we DO agree... that you can only find true "religion" within yourself, learning from your mistakes as you go along.
As far as I can tell this isn't Ben Williams' mission though. Maybe I'm just frustrated but I get a bad vibe from this essay. I suspect that Williams wants you to leave the (unholy) church to follow the "Christ" that is really... the wannabee prophet Ben Williams...
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by notmartha »

An "oxymoron" is a combination of contradictory or incongruous words. The word "Jew" is not an "oxymoron." The phrase "Judeo-Christian" is, in my opinion, an oxymoron. A term of art is a word or phrase that has special meaning in a particular context. Both the word "Jew" and the phrase "Judeo-Christian" are terms of art.

In the context of Ben's post, "Jews" are not [generally] Israelites. I have posted many places the changing of the meaning of the term "Jew." As I showed in the "Jew" topic, Ben acknowledges the Ashkenazi "Jews," who came along some 1200ish years after the Persian/"Jew" mishmash was sent to Jerusalem by King Cyrus [559 - 530 B.C.].

This map was previously posted to show the Ashkenazi presence in the Persian Empire.

Image

Poisoning the well is a cheap shot of argument. Ben isn't selling anything, taking claim of any title, foretelling future events (other than the obvious) or asking anyone to "follow" him. He tries to encourage truth-seeking. Plain and simple.

For the record... I do not know Ben, I'm not a "fan," don't always agree with what he says, just find his words more eloquent than mine at times, and therefor quote him (along with dozens and dozens of other people I quote) when I feel it is applicable.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by Firestarter »

notmartha wrote: Mon Dec 13, 2021 1:46 pmA term of art is a word or phrase that has special meaning in a particular context. In the context of Ben's post, "Jews" are not (all) Israelites.
Did I miss this? Nowhere does he say, "some" Jews, but instead "Jews are not Israelites"!
The English word "Jew" is nothing more or less than of, from and/or like (the tribe or Kingdom of) Judah. Maybe you remember, Judah was one of the sons of Jacob, a.k.a. Israel, his descandants were/are Israelites.

Williams even claims that "Jesus" wasn't a Jew! Why is this even important? Why would this make him less of a man?
According to this Ben Williams, the "Jesus" of the New Testament was really "Mithras", so yes that would make him NOT a "Jew", but that isn't the tale he's spinning here is he?


.
notmartha wrote: Mon Dec 13, 2021 1:46 pm Um, no. Poisoning the well is a cheap shot of argument. He isn't selling anything, taking claim of any title, foretelling future events (other than the obvious) or asking anyone to "follow" him. He tries to encourage truth-seeking. Plain and simple.
Yeah sure... like he doesn't sell the (false) prophet Ben Williams to gullible fools.
You could have (and probably have) read this, Williams advertising saint Ben. Williams claims that this is entirely written by somebody else, so completely objective that he isn't embarassed to post this as "About Ben"...
.
After attending seminary, Ben started out as a church pastor in the 70’s. He soon outgrew [very objective!] his first pastorate in a traditional church.
(...)

God led him away from the churches … away from the failed traditions of establishment religion, and began opening the Bible to him. [You can't get any closer to claiming to be a PROPHET can you?]
No one explains the Bible like Ben does. [The use of doublespeak that becomes a mixed up mess is quite common for politicians and other false prophets]
Anyone reading Ben’s writings won’t be easily misled by the false prophets in churches, the corrupt politicians of government, or the antichrist schools and universities. [Speaking with a forked tongue will certainly make people more susceptible to propaganda
(...)

While most Bible teachers get stuck in mediocrity and the rehashing of nonsensical church tradition, Ben breaks out of the rut and goes after truth. He has never settled for conventional wisdom, church mysticism and “mystery,” or confusing political rhetoric. [What does it mean if somebody praises himself like this on his own blogspot?]
(...)

God has turned a light on in Ben’s head, and his readers benefit from it. [Are some people dumb enough to believe this BS?]
(...)

He is dedicated to “the hope of Israel” (Acts 28:20) and the “good news” that Christ is Reigning and breathing life into his remnant! ["Dedicated" to his mission of being admired]
https://benwilliamslibrary.com/blog/?page_id=361


Of course blowing up your ego to mythical proportions doesn't necessarily makes one a narcissist, but Ben Williams sure makes a convincing case!
But then again using the blogs of some false prophet as a starting point for your own investigations, shouldn't harm anybody!

The truth of the matter is that following Joshua of Nazareth won't get you admired by many, but hated by many. It could even get you tortured and executed by the authorities.
You won't learn His teachings from any book, or blog, written by false prophets, but looking inside yourself, learning from your mistakes as you go along...
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by notmartha »

Did you have anything to add about the term of art "Judeo-Christian?"

Like, how previous to George Orwell's use of it in 1939 it was used to indicate a "Jew" that converted to Christianity. (I'd generally refer to this as Messianic Jew.)

Like, how the term was used as a political football during the Cold War, to group together the "religious" in opposition to the atheistic commies, evidenced by quotes such as this one from Eisenhower:

"Our form of government has no sense unless it is founded in a deeply felt religious faith, and I don't care what it is. With us, of course, it is the Judeo-Christian concept but it must be a religion that all men are created equal."

Or, maybe you want to share how the "moral majority" of Falwell and his ilk commandeered the term in the '70's, trying to make the "Church" look more inclusive, morphing religions together, with the goal being one world religion.

Or, maybe you would want to contribute to an explanation of how the "Religious Right" expanded the "Judeo-Christian" rhetoric to include "Judeo-Christian Ethics" (JCE) and/or "Judeo-Christian Tradition" (JCT).

Or, you could just continue on the path of Ben Bashing, maybe comparing THIS BIO to THIS BIO (both written by his friend and illustrator, not himself), tearing down the messenger instead of the message, missing the opportunity to edify yourself and others.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 2583
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by Firestarter »

notmartha wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 1:15 pmDid you have anything to add about the term of art "Judeo-Christian?"
Instead of explaining how "Judeo-Christianity" is an "oxymoron", you posted a worthless piece by a prophet wannabee. You wanted to explain something, but I'm afraid that I don't understand what the relevance is of this mixed up mess.
You could have posted this same mess without quoting me. But I think you shouldn't have posted this at all...

In general, I believe that all "organised" religion is an "oxymoron", and think that the only good "religion" is one where people think for themselves.
I'm not even sure about this though, as I'm beginning to doubt more and more that humans are intrinsically good. So thinking for ourselves, without some organisation to keep us in line, could do more harm than good.

.
notmartha wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 1:15 pmOr, you could just continue on the path of Ben Bashing, maybe comparing THIS BIO to THIS BIO (both written by his friend and illustrator, not himself), tearing down the messenger instead of the message, missing the opportunity to edify yourself and others.
As for false prophets...
I've collected some music here that might explain my thoughts.
.
Firestarter wrote: Tue Dec 14, 2021 10:00 pmGenesis - Jesus he knows me (1991)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35K6vQRt67g
viewtopic.php?p=70976#p70976
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: https://ronpaulforums.com/threads/googl ... 090/page-6

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by notmartha »

My posts above were edited to remove quotes from other members. I also defined and qualified my use of "oxymoron" and "term of art."
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 899
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Judeo-Christian

Post by notmartha »

Quotes from the "Right"

Mitt Romney
Central to America's rise to global leadership is our Judeo-Christian tradition with the vision of the goodness and possibilities of every human life.
James Dobson
The United States has been from the beginning greatly influenced and primarily influenced by the Judeo-Christian system of values.
Charles Colson
If the polls are right, our Judeo-Christian heritage is no longer the foundation of our values. We have become a post-Christian society.
Judeo-Christian revelation is not the negative influence secularists proclaim it to be. Rather, it is the taproot of our civilization.
William F. Buckley Jr.
Conservatives should be adamant about the need for the reappearance of Judeo-Christianity in the public square.

D. James Kennedy
In modern America, Judeo-Christian beliefs are often held up to ridicule and disdain by the media.
Dennis Prager
Leftism seeks to undo most of the values that are distinct to Judeo-Christian religion.
Bill Bright
The American Civil Liberties Union, has helped neutralize the Judeo-Christian underpinnings of our legal system by seeking new legal precedents.

Ronald Reagan
“Traditional Judeo-Christian values based on the moral teaching of religion are undergoing what is perhaps their most serious challenge in our nation’s history.”
Paul Ryan
It’s a path that grows government, restricts freedom and liberty and compromises those values, those Judeo-Christian, Western civilization values that made us such a great and exceptional nation in the first place.”
David A. Norris, Restoring Education: Central to American Greatness
“From the beginning, Judeo-Christian principles have been the foundation for American public dialogue and government policy. They serve as the solid basis for political activism in support of a better socioeconomic environment. Found in American homes, truth from the Hebrew Christian Bible has enabled individual liberty to prevail over secular empires because it is a practical message about reality from man’s Creator.

In their quest for liberty, Americans focused upon the conspicuously self-evident “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God.” It is the governing character of these principles (laws), such as humility, the Golden Rule, and the Ten Commandments, that leads to success. This is the sure foundation upon which man’s right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” rests. Called “virtue” by America’s Founding Fathers, the impartial and divine element frees man to do what is right. “Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty” (2 Cor. 3:17).”
Quotes from the "Left"

George McGovern
Reaganism is not only at odds with the Judeo-Christian heritage, it will not work.
Peter Singer
Christianity is our foe. If animal rights is to succeed, we must destroy the Judeo-Christian religious tradition.


Esoteric and/or Spiritualist Quotes

Robert Ambelain
“In fact the Kabbalah rests upon the exoteric Judeo-Christian tradition. It consists of metaphysics and philosophy, from which can be drawn a mystical way, which is applied and regulated through personal asceticism.”
Michael Tsarion
The origins of Judeo-Christianity are to be found in Egypt.
Gerald Massey
“Christianity was neither original nor unique, but that the roots of much of the Judeo/ Christian tradition lay in the prevailing Kamite (ancient Egyptian) culture of the region.”
Quotes Outside the Narrative

Theodore Beale, aka Vox Day
Judeochristianity is, and has always been, an ahistorical deception targeting naive American Christians. Unlike Europeans, most 20th-Century Americans knew nothing about Jews or their history, which is why the post-1945 propaganda campaign to convince American Christians that they shared a common faith heritage with Jews rather than a completely antithetical one was mostly successful.

Chuck Baldwin, November 14, 2019
No, America does NOT have a “Judeo-Christian” heritage. That term is the quintessential oxymoron. America has a CHRISTIAN heritage. And ever since the NWO created the Zionist State of Israel, it has used that international platform to corrupt virtually every important industry that influences American culture.
My Farewell to Israel, Jack Bernstein
In comparing the degree to which the followers of the 3 major religions practice their beliefs, I make this observation:

Judaism - Few Jews, Sephardic or Ashkenazi, are religious. This is true in America, in Israel and world-wide.

Christianity - The Christians' religion has felt the influence of Jewish meddling and infiltration (especially in America) resulting in confusion and bickering between the various Christian denominations. This has led to a 'lukewarm' attitude among most Christians toward their religion. There is evidence to prove that Jews, or one of their many fronts, have started many of the Christian denominations and thus dominate doctrine.

Islam - Moslems, who follow the teachings of Islam, are by far the most fervent of the 3 major religions in following their religious beliefs.

The Judeo-Christian ethic we hear so much about in America is a big joke - the result of an intense Zionist propaganda campaign.

I'll toss in one last thought about the "God's Chosen People" myth: God said, 'Beware of those who call themselves Jews and are not, for they lie'. Could it be the Ashkenazi Khazar-Jews are the people to whom God was referring?
Post Reply