JFK assassination – CIA, Permindex, Indonesia

Comments about your favorite candidate, the newest PROPOSED law, and the FEMA camp near your hometown should go here.
User avatar
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: JFK assassination – CIA, Permindex, Indonesia

Post by Firestarter » Thu Oct 04, 2018 4:22 pm

In this post information on some of the motives for assassinating President John F. Kennedy…

During the 1960 presidential election Kennedy gave his support for the oil depletion allowance, but that changed in 2 years.
On 16 October 1962, Kennedy passed an act through Congress that removed the distinction between repatriated profits and profits reinvested abroad. This law especially affected the oil companies, oilmen saw their earnings on foreign investment drop from an estimated 30% to 15%.
On 17 January 1963, President Kennedy presented his proposals for tax reform. At this time Kennedy stated that he wanted to remove special privileges and loopholes. He even said he wanted to put an end to the oil depletion allowance that since 1926 gave the oil barons the right to take 27.5% of their earnings tax-free. It is estimated that if the oil depletion allowance had been removed this would have resulted in a loss of around $300 million a year to Texas oilmen.
After JFK had been assassinated, President Lyndon B. Johnson dropped the plans to remove the oil depletion allowance. It took until the arrival of President Jimmy Carter that the oil depletion allowance was removed.

The first investor to take advantage of the discovery of oil in October 1930 in East Texas was Haroldson L. Hunt.
Since 1948, the Suite 8F Group of oilmen including H.L. Hunt were major financial supporters of Lyndon B. Johnson. Large sums of money came from Brown & Root, the “big gas pipeline company”: https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKoildepletion.htm

In April 1962, President Kennedy had already made an enemy of the steel producing industry, when he forced a price rollback by sending FBI agents into corporate offices.
As part of the new plans to make an end to the oil depletion allowance, Robert Kennedy instructed the FBI to ask oil companies for specific production and sales data.

One of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover's good friends, the Texas oilman Clint Murchison Sr., was among the most aggressive players in the depletion allowance dispute.
Another strong defender of the allowance was Democratic senator Robert Kerr, who owned the Kerr-McGee oil company. When Prescott's son, George H.W. Bush, started up his Zapata Offshore [oil] operation, Kerr offered some of his own executives to help.

Oil executive Jack Crichton, close to Bush, head of a secretive Dallas-based, oil-connected military intelligence unit had Clint Murchison Sr. on his board of directors.
In one of those strange coincidences another director was D. Harold Byrd, owner of the Texas School Book Depository building: https://www.businessinsider.com/what-th ... &r=US&IR=T
(archived here: http://archive.is/gT2b5)

On 11 October 1963, Kennedy signed National Security Action Memorandum 263 to withdraw 1,000 of roughly 16,000 Americans stationed in Vietnam by the end of 1963, with the complete withdrawal by the end of 1965.
They started to withdraw on 14 November 1963, 8 days later JFK was dead: https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.htm ... PageId=421

After Johnson was made president, the Gulf of Tonkin incident was staged, to make a massive war effort against Vietnam (more than 500,000 soldiers): https://www.lawfulpath.com/forum/viewto ... 1058#p3746

Kennedy was even trying to make an end to the “Cold war” and, in a September 1963 United Nations speech, even went as far (too far?) to talk about plans to stage the moon landings with the Soviets:
In a field where the United States and the Soviet Union have a special capacity—in the field of space—there is room for new cooperation, for further joint efforts in the regulation and exploration of space.
I include among these possibilities a joint expedition to the moon.
https://www.history.com/news/10-things- ... lo-program
User avatar
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Dinkin and Christensen knew

Post by Firestarter » Tue Aug 13, 2019 3:45 pm

Two US soldiers, independepent from each other, found messages, prior to his murder in Dallas, that President John F. Kennedy would be assassinated.
Both soldiers were subsequently “treated” in mental institutions.

Private First Class Eugene B. Dinkin was a cryptographic code operator stationed in Metz, France.
On 4 November 1963, he went AWOL from his unit and travelled to Switzerland.
On 6 November, Dinkin told reporters in the Press Room of the United Nations in Geneva that he was being persecuted and that "they" were plotting against President Kennedy and that "something" would happen in Dallas. Dinkin thought that the plot would happen around 28 November 1963 and would be blamed on a “Communist or a negro”.

On 13 November 1963, Dinkin was arrested and locked up in a psychiatric hospital. He was later transferred to Walter Reed, where he had to stay for months.
On 29 November, his warnings reached the White House of Lyndon B. Johnson and in April 1964 went to the Warren Commission: https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/Alleg ... inkin.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/RSKTi)

Also prior to the assassination, Air Force Sergeant David Christensen, who was stationed at Kirknewton, Scotland, intercepted communications that President Kennedy would be assassinated.
He tried to sent it to the NSA: https://www.nsa.gov/news-features/decla ... k00233.pdf
(archived here: https://web.archive.org/web/20170427055 ... k00233.pdf)

After the 22 November 1963 murder, Christensen was committed to a mental health institution from where he wrote a letter to his friend Sgt Michael B. Stevensen at “Corry” Field, Florida.
Christ, you remember the position I worked at, in Sgt Praters section, don’t you? You remember about a month or 6 weeks before I left Scotland, when I picked up a link mentioning the assassination of President Kennedy. How hard I tried to get it sent out, and because of that fuckin Forney and Delaughter they wouldn’t send it to NSA. Since I have learned that the man’s name; most mentioned was number 4 in a certain branch of organized crime at the time. Was number 2 last year.
I will send you a form for proof of claim. This guy here “the 203” says I should be getting a service connected disability for my nerves. The “link was” Lisbon to Tangiers you remember. How I got my ass chewed for not dropping the link. Have learned that this branch of crime often will put out a feeler of forthcoming things. By sending it as a practice message.

Nick it really broke me up after Nov. 22, 63. Especially when I had it all before hand. It was first like the 202’s said, Ha. I was nuts when the Russians first came out with the ITI & B’s. Later proved them wrong didn’t I. That was another first for us as I recall. Duane Bruntz from Baker trick put up a good
support of my claim.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research ... 270296.pdf
(archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/201906190817 ... 270296.pdf)
User avatar
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Oltmans, Royals, JFK

Post by Firestarter » Mon Aug 19, 2019 4:54 pm

For some time I´ve had doubts about the journalist Willem Oltmans, who got awarded 8 million guilders tax free in 2000 because of being the victim of the Dutch State.
Genuine victims of the Dutch government don´t get millions awarded! What speaks even more against Oltmans is that he continued to get much publicity, while he was supposedly targeted.
Oltmans even worked for the Dutch state TV!

The story of Oltmans, is something like that he was first targeted by Joseph Luns in 1956, when he first interviewed President Sukarna of Indonesia.

Oltmans in his 1994 book presents one piece of evidence that he was indeed declared a “persona non grata” that is the 26 November 1962 letter from the Dutch Ministery of Foreign Affairs, which was sent to Dutch Embassies around the world that Oltmans couldn´t use the same facilities as (other) journalists.

That Oltmans wasn´t a “real” victims is shown by his close ties to the Dutch Royal family (that even made sure that he got 8 million from the taxpayer).
Willem Oltmans shared a teacher with Princess Beatrix, G. Büringh Boekhoudt.

Oltmans was part of the group of Paul Rijkens (of Unilever) that was controlled by none other than Bilderberg co-founder Prince Bernhard.
Oltmans often spoke to Emile Konijneburg (of the Rijkens Group), who was also a regular visitor at Palace Soestdijk. Konijneburg was Vice President of the KLM airways, which was linked to Bernhard.

Oltmans was also close to the Philips higher management that was also close to Prince Bernhard.
Oltmans was even a long-time friend of the same Hans Teengs Gerritsen that was involved in getting Prince Bernhard millions in bribes from arms companies, including Lockheed and Northrop.

Oltmans was intimate with the eugenics Club of Rome for which he travelled to their “Cold War” Allies, the Soviet Union.
The Club of Rome was also associated with Princess Beatrix and her late husband Claus and the 1001 Club of Bernhard.

Oltmans was working for Dutch corporate (royal) interests in Sukarno´s Indonesia, where he used his contacts for Dutch multinationals.
He was also involved in setting up a Philips office in the Communist Soviet Union in Moscow.
Oltmans arranged that KLM could resume its flights to Surinam after its independence.

Oltmans was a friend of Pattrick Russell, the attorney that has never released the book of George de Mohrenschildt on the John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy.
He even claims that he got Prince Bernhard invited to talk with President Kennedy and that Bernhard argued that the Netherlands should leave New Guinea immediately!

In 1994, Willem Oltmans (like any other victim of the goverment) was part of the press team accompanying Prime Minister Ruud Lubbers on official trips to South Africa and Indonesia!

Willem Oltmans – Persona non grata (1994), in Dutch: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/oltm003pers0 ... s02_01.pdf

If the Dutch government had wanted to destroy Oltmans that would have been quite easy...
Willem Oltmans was gay before that was socially accepted. There are even stories that he molested underage boys!

How ridiculous the “conspiracy story” of Oltmans being the victim of the Dutch government really is, is not only his close connections to the Dutch Royal family but also the background of the Joseph Luns that supposedly destroyed his career.

The lawyer Joseph Luns joined the Dutch Nazis of the NSB in 1933. Luns never even called this a “misjudgment".
The Dutch Royal family was of course involved in financing the Nazis, while Bernhard was an active member of the Nazi party.

Luns, before and after he became minister, worked closely with the protégé of Queen Juliana, the banker Johan Willem Beyen.
Luns was Foreign Minister from 1956 to 1971, when he became NATO Secretary-General until 1984.

Joseph Luns, like Juliana, Bernhard and Beatrix, was also a Knight of Malta.
Between 1964 and 1984 Luns was present at every annual Bilderberg conference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Luns

Here’s more information (FBI files?) on Willem Oltmans, in English, including what he claimed on the assassination of John F. Kennedy. It goes on until April 1977, after George de Mohrenschildt reportedly committed suicide on 29 March 1977.

In 1961, Willem Oltmans talked with John F. Kennedy’s special adviser W.N. Rostow.
In 1962, the Dutch UN delegation called Willem Oltmans “an agent of a foreign power”.

In January 1976, De Mohrenschildt wrote Oltmans that he was preparing a book on the JFK assassination.
In June 1976, De Mohrenschildt finished his book but his wife Jeanne de Mohrenschildt didn’t want it published. According to Oltmans, the book was sent to Pat Russell’s office (De Mohrenschildt’s lawyer).

In November 1976, Oltmans went to Dallas and when he called, was told by Jeanne de Mohrenschildt and Pat S. Russell that De Mohrenschildt had been locked up in a mental hospital for months, and tortured with electroshocks for a “persecution complex”.
When they talked, De Mohrenschildt told Oltmans that he was afraid to make a statement while in the US. Oltmans made a deal with his Dutch television superior for a broadcast with De Mohrenschildt.
On 29 March 1977, the House Committee on Assassinations was in Palm Beach to interview De Mohrenschildt, when he died of a reported “suicide”.

On 1 April 1977, Oltmans said:
George de Mohrenschildt told him the alleged conspiracy involved Texas oilmen, Cuban exiles, and CIA and FBI agents...
De Mohrenschildt claimed he was a middleman between H.L. Hunt representing Texas oilmen and Lee Harvey Oswald...
De Mohrenschildt told him Cubans had fired at Kennedy at the same time Oswald did and said he gave the House Assassinations Committee the name and picture of one Cuban he believes was involved.
[Oltmans] gave the committee a taped interview in which a Cuban exile named Loran Hall claims he was offered $50.000 in the office of ilman Lester Logue to kill Kennedy.
https://www.archives.gov/files/research ... -10033.pdf
(archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/201908191601 ... -10033.pdf)
User avatar
Posts: 1220
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

James Fetzer - Assassination Science

Post by Firestarter » Mon Oct 21, 2019 4:39 pm

James Fetzer’s “Assassination Science” has a strange title as it is really about the John F. Kennedy assassination.
It isn’t an overview story, so isn’t the best for an introduction. It is however a genuine investigation on some of the holes in the official story that the deranged lone wolf shooter Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK all by himself. The “science” in the title is to indicate that this is a critical “scientific” investigation of the available evidence, so there is no “hip language” and some of the arguments are difficult to follow.
There is only one problem with the PDF version of this book, that some pictures are of a poor quality, so sometimes the arguments (based on photos and video frames) cannot be followed; most if not all of these pictures are available on the internet, but finding all of these (while reading the book) takes a lot of time…

It’s strange that while the Select Committee on Assassinations of the House of Representatives (HSCA) in 1979 concluded that President Kennedy "probably" had been assassinated by a conspiracy that involved at least 2 shooters, one from the grassy knoll, the official story still reads that Oswald did it alone…

According to multiple witnesses the driver of the limo, William Greer, brought it to a stop after the first bullets were fired.
This shows that Secret Service was involved in the assassination.

There is no evidence that Oswald fired a gun from the sixth-floor window of the Book Depository or anywhere else on the day of the assassination.

Within 72 hours of the assassination it would have been important to look for possible accomplices of Lee Harvey Oswald.
Deputy Attorney General Nicholas deBelleview “Nick” Katzenbach already on 25 November 1963 wrote a memorandum to (new president) Lyndon B. Johnson's Press Secretary, Bill Moyers:
1. The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large; and that the evidence was such that he would have been convicted at trial.

Several witnesses of the fatally injured Kennedy being treated confirm that the bullet hole in JFK’s throat looked like a (small) entry wound. Dr. Malcolm Perry made a small tracheotomy incision, which seems ridiculous if the throat wound were an exit wound.
Malcolm Perry testified:
I considered the throat wound to be an entrance wound and the large head wound to be an exit wound. Along with many of my Parkland colleagues, I believed at the time that President Kennedy had been hit twice from the front.
The wound appeared to be an entrance wound in the front of the throat; yes, that is correct.

Dr. Paul Peters testified:
We saw the wound of entry in the throat and noted the large occipital wound.
Dr. Ronald Jones testified:
... a small hole in the midline of the neck thought to be a bullet entrance wound.
Usually when a bullet exits the flesh, it violently blows out a lot of tissue. Eyewitnesses have confirmed that bone, scalp, and hair were missing from the back of JFK’s head, and brain tissue, including much of the cerebellum, was hanging from the opening.

If the injury to the throat wasn’t caused by an exiting bullet, Governor John Connally must have been hit by a separate shot.
Governor Connally testified that he thought he was shot after Kennedy.
Connally appears to have been wounded AFTER the fatal headshot to JFK.

The military physicians who performed the autopsy at Bethesda Naval Hospital were incompetent.
Thornton Boswell, James Humes and Pierre Finck were hospital pathologists with little experience with autopsies or bullet wounds.

David Mantik concluded that certain X-rays of JFK were fabricated to conceal the massive exit wound to the back of his skull, which numerous eyewitnesses have confirmed (and even the Zapruder video). A 6.5 mm bullet was added to the X-ray film.

David S. Lifton described that the transportation of Kennedy's corpse from Parkland to Bethesda made it possible to surgically alter his body (for example increasing the size of the throat wound).

According to “world authority on the human brain” Robert B. Livingston, the diagrams of the brain stored in the National Archives, weren’t of JFK.

The single-bullet hypothesis, first speculated on by Assistant Counsel for the Warren Commission, Arlen Specter, holds that one bullet entered Kennedy's back, exited the throat, and passed through Connally's chest, wrist, and temporarily lodged in his leg.
Mantik also discovered that the path of the "magic bullet" was anatomically impossible as it couldn’t have passed through cervical vertebra. Especially not a bullet that was found in a nearly pristine condition.

In 1991, in Dallas nurse Audrey Bell, who helped treat JFK at Parkland hospital, told that the physicians removed 5 substantial bullet fragments from Connally (so how could the bullet have been so “pristine”?).
From the more than 30 bullet fragments in Kennedy's head, only 2 were tested.

The Warren Commission concluded that Oswald needed at least 2.3 seconds between shots. The Warren Commission elected that the entire assassination took place from frames Z-210 to Z-313 (from the Zapruder fake), or a time span of 5.62 seconds, enough time for (only) 3 shots.
If Kennedy was struck in the back at frame Z-225 and Connally at Z-238, this would mean a time span of 0.71 seconds. Even if Kennedy was shot as early as Z-210, that would still be only a 1.53 seconds time span. This is impossible if Oswald were the only shooter.

A more probable explanation is that (at least) 3 assassins from different locations fired 4 shots.
The first and third shots were fired from the Depository-most likely from the sixth floor.
The second shot, wounding Connally, from the east side of Dealey Plaza from the top of a building.
The fourth and final shot was fired from the grassy knoll, near the corner of the stockade fence.

James Fetzer, Assassination Science (1998), 22 MB: https://www.krusch.com/books/kennedy/As ... cience.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/201412060814 ... cience.pdf)

Since 1998, Fetzer has continued to write articles on the JFK assassination and even published several (new) books on the topic.

One of the important topics (also in his 1998 book), is that the Zapruder video has been manipulated, obviously to hide that there were multiple shooters and that the limousine came to a full stop after the first shot was fired.
There are differences between eyewitness testimonies and the video.
There are also a number of anomalies.

Mary Moorman took a photo of President Kennedy being shot.

The angle of the photo, and confirmed by witnesses and Moorman herself, show that she was on the street when she took the picture.
In the Zapruder video she is shown as still standing on the grass.

In the Zapruder movie she has white shoes, while photos confirm that she wore black shoes that day.
http://web.archive.org/web/201202200644 ... m/Moorman/

Last week James Fetzer was ordered to pay $450.000 to the father of one of the supposed victims of the Sandy Hook massacre: viewtopic.php?f=31&t=1634
Post Reply