Vaccine madness

General healthcare discussion, and Obamacare news.
Please note that specific help and support for Gregory Allan's book "How to Survive Hospital Costs Without Insurance" must be directed to the private Forum used for that purpose.
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 745
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Vaccine madness

Post by notmartha » Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 pm

Ben Williams’ Straight Talk Newsletters are published bi-monthly and can be found at this link: https://benwilliamslibrary.com/sitemap.html

The May/June issue is about the natural consequences of disobedience to God, specifically in relation to vaccinations usurping God’s design of natural immunity, and His Laws regarding quarantine and sanitation. The biggest problem I have with vaccinations is that trusting, unknowing children are the victims of their parents’ willful ignorance and disobedience. I say “willful” because the information is out there and there is almost always an option to “opt out.”

Here are excerpts from Ben’s newsletter:

Vaccinations, a Curse
Our choices reflect what we believe. If we choose to obey God and his law it means we believe in Him. If we choose to invent our own laws it means that we believe in ourselves (or in men).

We can choose to believe what we wish, but it has consequences. God's word tells us very plainly that if we choose to believe in Him and his laws we will be blessed. But if we choose to believe in ourselves and men's laws we will be cursed - meaning that we will suffer the natural consequences of stupid choices.
Today, Americans are doing stupid things, terrible things, like murdering their babies, and letting doctors inject them with diseased foreign tissue - foreign DNA - from animals (chickens, monkeys, etc.), along with toxic chemicals directly into their children's blood systems.

Vaccines are made from disease viruses or bacteria that have been cultured in tissues of animals, in chicken eggs, or in tissues derived from other humans. The polio vaccine, for example, was developed in the 5Os by growing the polio virus in a culture made of kidneys from Green African Monkeys. Many children of my generation died as a result of those polio vaccinations. But the doctors and our government didn't tell us about the ones that died. They only told us about the ones who survived.

Read the rest of Ben Williams’ Straight Talk Newsletter here:
https://benwilliamslibrary.com/pdfs/st19-5&6.pdf
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Vaccine madness

Post by Firestarter » Fri May 03, 2019 3:57 pm

notmartha wrote:
Mon Apr 29, 2019 12:55 pm
Today, Americans are doing stupid things, terrible things, like murdering their babies, and letting doctors inject them with diseased foreign tissue - foreign DNA - from animals (chickens, monkeys, etc.), along with toxic chemicals directly into their children's blood systems.

Vaccines are made from disease viruses or bacteria that have been cultured in tissues of animals, in chicken eggs, or in tissues derived from other humans.
When you believe in God, medical science is saying that vaccination is better than God´s creation.
If you believe in evolution, medical science is saying that vaccination is better than nature.

I guess that some Christians find this fact more shocking than me. “Authority on vaccines” Stanley Plotkin testifies that aborted babies are used in the development of vaccines. Plotkin also tells that he has problems with religious zealots.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NACBHtFMllA


Brooklyn judge Lawrence Knipel has dismissed the lawsuit brought by 5 anonymous parents against the mandatory measles vaccination order imposed by the mayor earlier this month.

Judge Knipel called the mandatory vaccination order “a rare but necessary step” and dismissed the parents’ arguments that it violates “individual autonomy, informed consent and free exercise of religion”, medical ethics, “the Nuremberg Code” and that the authorities had not proven a genuine public health crisis.
NYC has claimed that a total of 329 New Yorkers, out of of 8.6 million people, have been infected with measles since September 2018.

Knipel argued: “A fireman need not obtain the informed consent of the owner before extinguishing a house fire. Vaccination is known to extinguish the fire of contagion”.
I hope I don’t have to explain why this “fire” analogy is preposterous...

At least 3 parents of unvaccinated children have already been fined $1,000 and threatened with another $2,000 penalty. Several Jewish schools and preschools have been shuttered for refusing to turn over their immunisation and attendance records to city authorities, while another 20 have received warnings.

Gofundme has banned crowdfunding by anti-vaxxers: https://www.rt.com/usa/456961-judge-dis ... -brooklyn/


I regularly read that big pharma claims that a vaccine is “effective” based on the antibodies in the blood of the test subjects that were poisoned with vaccines.
Of course this isn´t “evidence” at all that somebody is immune...

In 2010, former employees of Merck, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, filed a False Claims Act specifically calling out Merck’s vaccine deception since the late 1990's.
They argue that test results were screwed by adding animal antibodies to mumps vaccines during the trial and then finding those antibodies in the blood to claim that the human guinea pigs are immune.

Another trick used by Merck, under Protocol 007, was to test the vaccine against a less virulent strain virus than the "real-world" mumps viruses in the wild.

Merck did this to fabricate a "95% efficacy rate" for the mumps vaccine.

A virologist in Merck's vaccine division was threatend with jail if he reported the fraud to the FDA.

After the court document of Krahling and Wlochowski vs. Merck was unsealed, Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care filed a lawsuit against Merck for substantial monetary damages:
Merck designed a testing methodology that evaluated its vaccine against a less virulent strain of the mumps virus. After the results failed to yield Merck's desired efficacy, Merck abandoned the methodology and concealed the study's findings.

But no amount of extra time or dosages will be enough to eliminate the disease when the vaccine does not work as represented in the labeling. It will merely allow Merck to continue to misrepresent the vaccine’s efficacy and thereby maintain its exclusive hold on the relevant market with an inadequate vaccine.
https://www.naturalnews.com/036328_Merc ... s_Act.html


This is the court document from the first lawsuit (by the former employees): https://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/doc ... ms-Act.pdf

This is the court document from the second lawsuit (by Chatom):
https://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/doc ... -Mumps.pdf


Measles wasn’t very “dangerous” in the good old 1960s (before MMR vaccines); see some clips...
The Donna Reed show.
The Flintstones.
The Brady Bunch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDb0ZS3vB9g&feature=youtu.be
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - caused by vaccines

Post by Firestarter » Mon May 06, 2019 5:05 pm

There are some stories on the internet claiming that vaccines kill babies, labelled as the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS).
Making such an assumption isn´t scientific as only a proper placebo controlled trial could expose this. For some reason the WHO advises against placebo controlled trials for vaccines, so we have to do with the available information...

To argue this point, they say that because the US has the highest amount of vaccine doses (26) given to infants, the US has the highest infant mortality rates (IMR) of the “developed” world, while Japan without so many vaccines (12 vaccine doses) has the lowest infant mortality rates (2.8). Countries with IMRs even less than Japan are Singapore (2.3, 17 vaccines) and Sweden (2.8, 12 doses).
In 2009, there were approximately 4.5 million births and 28,000 infant deaths in the United
States - an IMR of 6.22 per 1000.
Maybe the Japanese simply have a lower death rate in general because they live healthier (eating less junk food for example) or have less polution.

In this paper the analysis is done based on the number of “vaccine dose” instead of the amount of injections. DTaP is given as a single injection but contains 3 separate vaccines (for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) which counts as 3 vaccine doses.
See the linear regression for 34 “developed” countries presented (of which the US has the highest IMR)...

See figure 1 - 2009 IMR and number of vaccine doses for 30 nations.
Image

See figure 2 - 2009 Mean IMR and number of vaccine doses (five categories).
Image

This correlation looks convincing, but it would be much more reliable if this analysis was done over several years. I also don’t understand how the analysis for 34 countries leads to a regression graph for 30 nations.
Because they didn´t take other years in account it could be argued that the authors of this study inentionally presented their data in this manner to “prove” their point. Of course big pharma does the same to support vaccines, but that shouldn’t be an excuse to do the same by so-called “anti-vaxxers”.

Before the vaccine campaigns “crib deaths” happened very rarely, after vaccine programs were introduced in the 1960s they became more common and relabelled as Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
Since than new “labels” for dead babies were invented, which lowered the SIDS, but the overall infant mortality rates in the US continued to remain high.

Gambia and Mongolia give its infants 22 vaccine doses, has a 91%–98% vaccine coverage rate, while its Infant mortality rates are 68.8 and 39.9 per 1000.
This again looks convincing, but would only be reliable if this analysis was done over other “developing” countries (with less vaccines). Why hasn´t a similar linear regression been presented?

Torch discovered that two-thirds of babies who died from SIDS had been vaccinated against DPT prior to death:
6.5% died within 12 hours of vaccination;
13% within 24 hours;
26% within 3 days;
37%, 61%, and 70% within 1, 2, and 3 weeks of vaccination.

Walker et al. found ‘‘the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization”.

Fine and Chen reported that babies died at a rate nearly 8 times greater than normal within 3 days after getting a DPT vaccination.

Neil Z Miller and Gary S Goldman - Infant mortality rates regressed against number of vaccine doses routinely given: Is there a biochemical or synergistic toxicity? (2011): https://www.nvic.org/getdoc/a8091d95-aa ... study.aspx
(archived here: http://archive.is/96Ohj)


As you might expect this “conspiracy theory” has been completely “debunked” by all “reputable” media, the “independent” Wikipedia and the WHO...
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - caused by vaccines

Post by Firestarter » Tue May 07, 2019 3:36 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Mon May 06, 2019 5:05 pm
Walker et al. found ‘‘the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DPT to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization”.
Here’s the (full) report; ALEXANDER M. WALKER et al. – Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Immunization and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (1987): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 9-0017.pdf

See the excerpts and Table 4 that includes information on the SIDS in similar studies (sadly missing from this table is the mortality after the first 28/29 days for comparison).
the SIDS mortality rate in the period zero to three days following DTP to be 7.3 times that in the period beginning 30 days after immunization (95 per cent confidence interval, 1.7 to 31). The mortality rate of non-immunized infants was 6.5 times that of immunized infants of the same age (95 per cent CI, 2.2 to 19).
(...)

The study population for the present report consists of all apparently healthy infants of birthweight greater than 2500 grams born in GHC hospitals from 1972 to 1983, who were subsequent users of GHC services, and for whom all medical records were retrievable in 1985 and 1986, the period during which this investigation was carried out. There were 35,581 deliveries at GHC hospitals during the period of study. An analysis of a random sample of records (see below) indicates that 75 per cent of these deliveries were of infants eligible for the present investigation. The surveyed population experience thus comprises the immunization and mortality of approximately 26,500 infants.
(...)

The case series consisted of all 29 SIDS deaths, so defined.
(...)

The timing of immunization in the population giving rise to the cases was estimated by examining 262 records of infants with birthweight >2500 grams, without medical conditions placing them at high risk for SIDS, and receiving their primary medical care at GHC during the period under review.
(...)

Thirty-nine of the total 43 cases identified on their death certificates as SIDS occurred in children born at GHC hospitals, during a period that encompassed 27,940.8 infant years of observation, giving an overall mortality of 1.4 cases per 1,000 infant years at risk.
(...)

Six of the 29 infants had not received pertussis vaccine at the time of their death (Table 1). This proportion is compared to that expected (1.56 out of 29) and further analyzed in Table 2. The relative mortality can be approximated by the cross product of Table 2, giving (6 x 27.44)/(23 x 1.56) = 4.6. The formal matched analysis yields an estimate of 6.5 fold increase in mortality of never-immunized over ever-immunized infants (95 per cent CI 2.2 and 19).
(...)

Four infants died within three days of DTP (three following the first immunization, one following the second) yielding an estimated age and period-adjusted relative mortality rate of 7.3 (95 per cent CI 1.7 to 31) by comparison to children immunized at least 30 days earlier. Age-adjusted mortality declined gradually over the four weeks following immunization. It should be noted that the confidence intervals for relative mortality in the fourth through 29th days following immunization extend well below one and therefore into the range of a mortality deficit. The overall mortality in the period 0 to 29 days following DTP was 2.9 times that in the period 30 or more days after immunization; the 95 per cent CI was 0.93 to 9.1.
(...)

Baraff, et al,6 reported five cases in the 3.5-day period 0-3 days following DTP and nine cases in the 22-day period 8-29 days following DTP. If the number of children at risk is N, then the ratio of SIDS daily mortality rates in the two periods is [5/(3.5 x N)]/[91(22 x N)] = (5/3.5)1(9/22) = 5.4.
(...)

TABLE 4-Case Series of SIDS Preceded by Pertussis Vaccine Relative Mortality Inferred from Ratios of Cases to Days-at-Risk
Image
The most interesting from Table 4 is the Relative Mortality. It´s strange that there are huge differences in the first 3 days; from 0.63 (lower than average) to 5.4 (so lower than the 7.3 found in this study).
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Infant Mortality - DTP vaccine

Post by Firestarter » Thu May 09, 2019 3:42 pm

Here´s the third study I post in this thread on infants dying “because” of vaccines - Mogensen et al. (2017).
According to Peter Aaby et al.:
All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.

What could account for all of the claims, backed up with scientific looking reports, that vaccines actually reduce Infant Mortality?
One way to manipulate vaccine studies in favour of vaccines, is to not correct for Healthy User Bias (HUB).
They don’t vaccinate severely ill children, and so the vaccinated children are healthier at the start of the study. Then when our wonderful “scientists” report that the vaccinated children are more healthy “because” of the vacccines, this is a fraud because the vaccinated group was healthier at the start of the study.

HUB is almost certainly responsible for the amazing mortality reductions (about 50%) reported for flu vaccines.

CDC researchers Paul Fine and Robert Chen wrote a paper on healthy user bias:
Review of the literature on SIDS, encephalopathies, and DPT suggests that a large number of factors are associated with both a tendency to avoid or delay vaccination and an increased risk of SIDS and other serious neurologic events. That failure to control for such factors may lead to spurious negative associations between vaccination and adverse events is evident in several published investigations.
Examination of the logic underlying this relation reveals that failure to control for such factors in analyses may mask true associations between vaccinations and certain adverse outcomes under certain conditions.

Mogensen et al. wrote about HUB in prior studies of DTP and mortality:
the “unvaccinated” children in these studies have usually been frail children too sick or malnourished to get vaccinated, and the studies may therefore have underestimated the negative effect of DTP.
In the Mogensen study they corrected for the children that weren´t vaccinated at first, because they were ill. This isn´t ideal, but better than most studies.
Since the censoring of sick children could have introduced a bias, we also conducted an intention-to-treat analysis in which the censored children were transferred to the DTP group. Hence, in this analysis we compared the mortality of the intended-DTP-vaccinated group and the not yet DTP-vaccinated group.

Mogensen et al reported that the DTP vaccine was associated with a 5-fold or 10-fold higher mortality rate (higher for girls).
DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP.
(...)

The negative effect was particularly strong for children who had received DTP only and no OPV (HR = 10.0 (2.61–38.6)). All-cause infant mortality after 3 months of age increased after the compared with ‘DTP-unvaccinated’ was associated with a HR of 5.00 (1.53–16.3) (Table 3); the HR was 9.98 (0.81–123) for girls and 3.93 (1.01–15.3) for boys.
If we also included vaccinations given on vaccinations- days-without-weighing in the landmark analysis, DTP (±OPV) compared with unvaccinated was associated with a HR of 3.90 (1.20– 12.3). When DTP had been given alone without OPV the HR was 10.0 (2.61–38.6) (Table 3).
(...)

the unvaccinated children had slightly worse nutritional status before 3 months of age than the children who were subsequently DTP vaccinated (p = 0.09) (Table 2); the unvaccinated children travelled more than the DTP vaccinated children. These biases would tend to favor rather than increase mortality in the DTP group and the estimates from the natural experiment may therefore still be conservative.
Image

The oral polio vaccine (OPV) reduced the higher mortality caused by the DTP vaccine for boys.
It is plausible that the OPV reduces mortality caused by the DTP vaccine. The DTP and OPV vaccines induce opposite types of immune activation: DTP vaccine induces Th2 polarization and OPV induces Th1 polarization. Research in animals shows that Th2 polarization would be harmful and Th1 polarization is beneficial for brain development.
In other words, this doesn’t prove that the polio vaccine reduces infant mortality without the DTP vaccine.

Surprisingly few studies have examined the impact on child survival (of introduction) of vaccines.
According to the SAGE review the majority of studies found a negative effect of the DTP vaccine (Higgins et al., 2014).
There is only one other study of the introduction of DTP. In rural Guinea-Bissau, DTP (±OPV) was associated with 2-fold higher mortality (Aaby et al., 2004a). All studies that documented vaccination status and followed children prospectively indicate that DTP has negative effects; a meta-analysis of the eight studies found 2-fold higher mortality for DTP-vaccinated compared with DTP-unvaccinated,mostly BCG-vaccinated controls (Aaby et al., 2016).
(...)

It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials. All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.

Even though the SAGE review called for randomized trials of the DTP vaccine (Higgins et al., 2014); the IVIR-AC committee indicated “that it will not be possible to examine the effect of DTP in an unbiased way”: http://vaccinepapers.org/high-mortality-dtp-vaccine/
(archived here: http://archive.is/uy6o3)


Here´s the full scientific looking report.
Mogensen et al.: The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment (2017): https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... Experiment
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Infant Mortality in Japan

Post by Firestarter » Sat May 11, 2019 3:50 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Thu May 09, 2019 3:42 pm
Mogensen et al.: The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis and Oral Polio Vaccine Among Young Infants in an Urban African Community: A Natural Experiment (2017): https://www.researchgate.net/publicatio ... Experiment
In my last post I forgot an important piece of information from the scientific looking report.
Since the introduction of DTP and OPV apparently was associated with increased mortality, we examined what happened to infant mortality from 3 to 12 months of age after the introduction of these vaccines. The mortality rate for all 3–11 months old children increased 2-fold (HR = 2.12 (1.07–4.19)) from 1980, before vaccinations, to 1982–1983, after the introduction of DTP and OPV (Table 4).
In 1980, before the introduction of the vaccines, the Infant Mortality Rate (IMR) for children aged 3-11 months was 4.7. The DTP and OPV vaccines were offered to children of 3 months and older in Guinea-Bissau since June 1981.

In 1981, the IMR jumped to 7.2;
1982 – 8.0;
1983 – 12.1 per 1000.
All-cause infant mortality more than doubled (2.12).


Viera Scheibner (real name - Viera Scheibnerova) has written some articles against vaccines, including on the DTP vaccines that – according to her - caused infant mortality in Japan from 1970 to 1974.
In my opinion, the pieces by Scheibner on vaccines aren’t “scientific” enough, but for most people that would probably make them easier to read. What I find problematic is that she only points to “vaccines” as the cause, but seems to ignore the lack of proper placebo controlled trials. Because no trials with placebo for controls are done, in many cases it’s impossible to be certain that vaccines are the cause.

After DTP vaccination was introduced to Japan routinely at 3 to 5 months of age, between 1970 and 1974 - 37 infant deaths and 57 severe adverse reactions occurred (9.5 severe reactions and 6.1 deaths per year).
As a result, Japan first stopped DTP vaccination for 2 months in 1975, and then resumed vaccinations at an age of 2 years. From 1975 to 1980, there were only 3 deaths and 8 severe adverse reactions (1.6 severe reactions and 0.5 deaths per year).
Japan went from 17th to first place lowest infant mortality in the world.

Cherry et al. (1988) concluded that vaccination when the infant was older, 2 years, reduced the incidence of severe vaccine adverse events.
Noble et al. (1987) tried to “debunk” that DTP vaccine is associated with higher infant mortality in Japan but had to admit:
It is difficult to exclude pertussis vaccines as a causal factor even when other etiologies are suggested, particularly when the adverse events occur in close temporal association with vaccination.

In 1988, Japanese parents could again start vaccinating their babies at 3 months of age, which caused the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) rate to more than quadrupel.
According to professor Hiroshi Nishida the SIDS rate for babies younger than 1 year had sharply increased from 0.07% in 1980 to 0.33% in 1992.

Noble et al. (1987) published the following graph that suggests that the higher pertussis vaccination rates from 1976 to 1979 caused a higher incidence of whooping cough. Although possibly big pharma supporting “scientists” can invent other explanations...
It also seems difficult to explain for vaccine supporters that in 1984 with a higher vaccination rate there was more whooping cough than at the end of the 1960s in Japan!
Image

Because brain damage caused by vaccines were reported, in July 1975 many parents in England stopped vaccinating their children: vaccination rates fell down to 30% or even lower.
McFarlane (1982) documented the lower mortality rates:
The postneonatal mortality fell markedly in 1976, the year in which a sharp decline in perinatal mortality rate began. Between 1976 and 1979, however, neither the late nor the postneonatal mortality rates fell any further. Indeed, the postneonatal mortality rate increased, slightly among babies born in 1977.
Fine and Clarkson (1982) were suprised that there wasn´t a higher incidence of whooping cough in this period of lower vaccination rates.

When the US mandated DTP vaccination in 1978, it resulted in a three-fold increase in the incidence of whooping cough, particularly in the well-vaccinated age group of 2 to 6 months (Hutchins et al. 1988).

When acellular vaccines were tested in the 1990s in Sweden, they expected 20 deaths but experienced 45 and also more adverse effects than anticipated (Olin et al. 1997).
There was also an epidemic of whooping cough at about 7 months into the trial, including in children who were given 3 shots, which made them stop the trial before the planned enddate (Olin 1995).
This suggests that the acellular pertussis vaccine causes whooping cough.

In trials, the pertussis vaccine is regularly used to induce encephalomyelitis in lab animals (Steinman et al. 1982). Isn’t it strange that when data suggests that DTP vaccines cause babies to die, our wonderful “scientists” are able to come up with other explanations and claim that the correlation to vaccines is only “coincidental”?

It’s sad to see that parents and other caretakers are blamed for the death of their children because of what is called the “Shaken Baby Syndrome”.

The vast majority of published studies only report on vaccine reactions up to 48 hours, which conveniently excludes about 90% of adverse reactions to vaccination: http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner1.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/6uSlp)


Here are more articles from Scheibner: http://www.whale.to/vaccines/scheibner_a.html


Here’s a video where Viera Scheibner gives her views on the horrors of vaccines.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zFYZTbAIx1Y
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Hattersley on Infant Mortality

Post by Firestarter » Fri May 17, 2019 4:40 pm

The following long story, written by Joseph Hattersley in 1993, gives some (other) possibilities (than vaccines) that could cause Infant Mortality. Some of it are examples of malnutrition...

William Torch noted that in one survey two-thirds of 103 American children died within 3 weeks after been given the DTP (diphtheria/tetanus/pertussis) vaccine.
See the number of infant deaths reported in VAERS, April 2019.
Image

Archie Kalokerinos found that the amount of infant deaths increased alarmingly after a “routine” vaccine campaign.
Death was common if a baby was vaccinated during or soon after an illness.

Because babies are born almost without antibodies to infectious diseases, it´s essential to breastfeed them. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) deaths are commonest in bottle-fed babies.
Cows’ milk, besides lacking antibodies, contains several times more methionine than mother´s milk.
Many babies are even fed “fake” formula milk, heated in a microwave. Microwaving destroys some of the nutrients and therefore is prohibited in Russia.

Some have found excess iron in SIDS autopsies. Ferritin is an oxidant that destroys vitamins C and E.
When Kalokerinos started his practice in an Aboriginal community infant mortality was close to 50%. By using ascorbate (a.k.a. vitamin C), infant mortality was virtually eliminated.
Frederick R. Klenner of Reidsville, North Carolina, also virtually banished infant mortality by giving mothers 5-15 grams of ascorbic acid daily.

Deficiency of zinc in mothers could be one reason for boys’ greater SIDS mortality than girls’; particularly for bottle-fed babies.
Zinc supplements for the mother are advisable; especially with baby boys: https://www.seanet.com/~alexs/ascorbate ... 4-p229.htm
(alternative: http://www.whale.to/a/hattersley1993.html)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - vaccines

Post by Firestarter » Mon May 20, 2019 4:46 pm

Charlotte, got a combined jab for diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough and polio, along with Hib meningitis and meningitis C vaccinations on Tuesday. She died less than a week later on Monday.
Pathologist Phillip Cox labelled the cause of death sudden infant death syndrome even though "Viral meningitis showed on Charlotte’s autopsy”.

Less than 3 days after Vance Vernon Walker received a number of vaccines, his mother found him death.
Two similar deaths were logged in the VAERS, but according to the Kootenai County coroner Robert West, 3 infants had died within days of vaccination, labelled as SIDS – a "diagnosis of exclusion".

A two month old baby girl died the same day the mother took her to the hospital for her two month checkup, where she got 4 shots. That evening, after she was put in bed, her parents checked up on her 45 minutes later to discover her dead.
After 3 weeks the coroner ruler this another case of SIDS.

In 1985, Sabra Cline was given her first DTP shot, and over the next 48 hours suffered the symptoms: twitches, seizures, and a cool skin that was turning blue. Little Sabra was taken to the hospital where her mother was “holding her when she died".
The mother replied to the idea that she had died from SIDS that it must have been the vaccine. The autopsy results 7 weeks later listed the cause of death as a swelling and inflammation of the brain.

If deaths occurs shortly AFTER vaccination, it should at least be investigated whether they are related to the vaccines.
For some reason, other possible causes are looked at, like: if the parents smoke, what position the baby sleeps in, if it's breast fed, or what kind of mattress it slept on. But for some reason vaccination is ruled out as the cause from the onset.

More recently in India there was a drop in infant mortality rates, from 68 to 60 per 1000 “concidentally” at the same time the vaccination rates decreased, from 54% in 1999 to 47.6% in 2004.
The Indian Express reported that:
For the first time, India has reported IMR below 60, with the survey from Registrar General of India released recently showing 58 deaths per 1,000 live births in the country. Though the rates are still high compared to other countries, the figures have shown decline from 68/1,000 live births in 2000, and 60/1,000 live births in 2004.

At the same time, Indian health authorities reported about the “worrying sign” that the already low immunisation rates are further declining.
The most alarming is the case of Uttar Pradesh, which shows a fall in immunisation from 43.7 per cent in 1998-99 to 28.1 per cent in the latest data. In 1998-1999, 54 per cent of the children in the country were reported to be fully immunised. But a district household survey 2002-2004, the data for which was released last month, shows a decline in this to 47.6 per cent.
http://documents.vaxresearch.com/Advers ... (SIDS).pdf
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome - vaccines

Post by Firestarter » Sat May 25, 2019 4:47 pm

The peak age for Sudden Infant Death Sysndrome is 2–4 months, which coincides with the introduction of 11 shots containing 16 vaccines. The CDC “noticed” that this caused concern:
From 2 to 4 months old, babies begin their primary course of vaccinations. This is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). The timing of these two events has led some people to believe they might be related.
But then the CDC claims that the scientific research showed that vaccines do not cause SIDS.

A case study on a 3-month old baby who died suddenly immediately after the hexavalent vaccination concluded:
This case offers a unique insight into the possible role of hexavalent vaccine in triggering a lethal outcome in a vulnerable baby.

Another case study reported that:
…that acute respiratory failure likely due to post hexavalent immunization-related shock was the cause of death.
https://kellybroganmd.com/driving-epide ... eath-sids/


The previous article referred to the following 2 relevant studies.

A study in the West African country of Guinea-Bissau concluded that the pentavalent vaccine was associated with higher infant mortality.

They determined whether co-administration of pentavalent vaccine (PV) with measles vaccine (MV) and yellow fever vaccine (YF) had similar negative effects.
This was a randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 2007-2011, in which 2331 children aged 6-23 months were given: placebo, or vaccines in different combinations that showed that the “inactivated” vaccines (DTP or pentavalent) are associated with higher infant mortality.

Adjusted mortality rate ratio (MRR) for the group that got live and inactivated vaccines compared to the group that got live vaccines only more than tripled - 3.24 (higher for girls 3.7 than boys 2.5).
MRR for the group that got vaccines for pentavalent, measles, and yellow fever compared to the group that got only measles, and yellow fever was almost 8 times higher 7.73 (lower for girls 4.9 than boys 8.9).

With the conclusion:
In line with previous studies of DTP, the present results indicate that pentavalent vaccine co-administered with MV and YF is associated with increased mortality.

A.B. Fisker et al. – Co-administration of live measles and yellow fever vaccines and inactivated pentavalent vaccines is associated with increased mortality compared with measles and yellow fever vaccines only (2014): http://web.archive.org/web/201702220122 ... e2014.ashx


The following study investigated the association between hexavalent vaccination and the short term risk of sudden unexpected deaths (SUD) in Italy. They did this because Germany reported a very high Standardised Mortality Ratio (SMR) of 23 after vaccination.

As in most “developed” countries, mortality rates decreased during from 1999–2004, as part of a long term trend. 96% of the planned hexavalent vaccines reached children in the first year of life in 2004.
To account for possibly bias because the non-vaccinated could be sicker from the onset (or other differences), they used each case as his/her own control.
The study consisted 604 subjects whose death certificate was compatible with SUD.

The Italian infant immunisation schedule includes:
3 doses of vaccines against diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliomyelitis, hepatitis B and haemophilus influenzae type b in the first year of life (at the 3rd, 5th, and 11th-12th months of age);
The first MMR vaccination is between the 12th and 15th months.

The age distribution of the 604 SUDs shows the strong decrease with age; the decline is particularly pronounced between the first and second vaccine dose - Fig. 3.
Image

They concluded:
Four deaths occurred within two days from vaccination with the hexavalent vaccines (RR = 1.5; 95% CI 0.6 to 4.2). The RRs for the risk periods 0–7 and 0–14 were 2.0 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.5) and 1.5 (95% CI 0.9 to 2.4). The increased risk was limited to the first dose (RR = 2.2; 95% CI 1.1 to 4.4), whereas no increase was observed for the second and third doses combined.
This looks like vaccines are especially damaging for very young children, while my impression is that health authorities advise them at a young age.

G. Traversa et al. – Sudden Unexpected Deaths and Vaccinations during the First Two Years of Life in Italy: A Case Series Study (2011): https://journals.plos.org/plosone/artic ... ne.0016363
(archived here: http://web.archive.org/web/201803101946 ... ne.0016363)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1213
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Ewing – Regressive autism

Post by Firestarter » Thu May 30, 2019 4:07 pm

I’ve found a good literature review that argues that the policy to administer Polio and DPT/HIB injections at 2, 3 and 4 months, followed by MMR at 13 months since 1996, has caused autism rates to rise rapidly.
In 1985, autism rates were less than 10 per 10,000.
By 2002, it was almost 1%.
Image

The scientific evidence clearly indicates that autism is caused by vaccination and is most closely associated with the schedule of vaccines culminating in the MMR vaccine.
Vaccines suppress the natural immune function, while it´s known that those with high levels of immune deficiency show greater rates of autistic spectrum disorders (ASD).
Autism appears to be almost non-existent in communities that don’t use vaccines, like for example the Amish.

One of my problems with this scientific looking report is that it rules out some other possible causes for autism. More vaccines are certainly not the only “change” in 1996 and the autism rates were already rising (slowly) in the 1980s.
I could make some guesses for other possible causes for the rising autism rates, like:
New additives to food (like artificial sweeteners or preservatives).
New pesticides.
People having children at a later age.
Children not being raised by their parents, but instead entering the school system from a young age.

That’s besides that the rising autism rates could be caused by flawed tests or definitions to diagnose it. I think that these days children get sentenced to a mental disorder much faster than when I was young...


The strong point of the review is that it also looks into other adverse effects of vaccines, like immune deficiency.

Vaccinations suppress the immune system, including the production of b-cells and t-cells. Excessive vaccination should be considered ineffective and dangerous.
The more vaccines, the greater the risk that the body's immune system no longer responds to diseases. This leads to the failure of immune function, which we note as allergies or immunodeficiency.

Vaccines can lead to mutated forms of disease, see e.g. the reemergence of whooping cough, with a differentiated disease profile, e.g. up to 30% of individuals with a persistent cough are infected with B. pertussis.
Furthermore vaccines can raise the susceptibility to virus infection, which could make tougher virus strains to flourish.

Contracting diseases naturally leads to less disease in the future, while – ironically - unvaccinated children are less exposed to disease, so delaying vaccination reduces exposure to disease.
So both ways you look at it, vaccinating young children causes more damage than it prevents...

Although it´s claimed that the pertussis vaccine is 88% effective for children of 7-18 months, in a nationwide epidemic of whooping cough in 1993, 82% had been fully poisoned with all advised DPT vaccines.
Others have commented that the whooping cough vaccine is only 36% effective.

Graham E. Ewing – What is regressive autism and why does it occur? Is it the consequence of multi-systemic dysfunction affecting the elimination of heavy metals and the ability to regulate neural temperature? (2009): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... T9KS-TKrIc


Firestarter wrote:
Sat Aug 04, 2018 4:41 pm
A pilot study comparing 650 vaccinated and unvaccinated homeschooled children in the United States provides a glimpse of the potential scope of vaccine harm.119 The study found that, compared to completely-unvaccinated children, fully-vaccinated children had an increased risk of 390% for allergies, 420% for ADHD, 420% for autism, 290% for eczema, 520% for learning disabilities, and 370% for any neuro-developmental delay.120 Fully-vaccinated pre-term infants had an increased risk of 1,450% for a neurodevelopmental disorder, which includes a learning disability, ADHD or autism, compared to completely unvaccinated preterm infants.121
Another recent study compared children receiving the flu shot with those receiving a saline injection in a prospective randomized double-blind study.122 Both groups had the same rate of influenza but the group receiving the flu shot had a 340% increased rate of non-influenza infection.123
Post Reply