What are THEY planning for us ??

Comments about your favorite candidate, the newest PROPOSED law, and the FEMA camp near your hometown should go here.
prophecy
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:59 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by prophecy »

Australia " Suspends " the Sale of Gold Restrictions under the 1959 Banking Act - note the key word "suspends " which in effect means that it can be re-instated immediately requiring private individuals to :

" deliver the gold to the Reserve Bank, or as prescribed, within one month after the gold comes into the person’s possession "

PRESS RELEASE No 29
EMGARBO 6.00pm
STATEMENT BY THE TREASURER, THE HON PHILLIP LYNCH, M.P.

PRIVATE OWNERSHIP AND SALE OF GOLD BY AUSTRALIAN RESIDENTS
SUSPENSION OF PART IV OF THE BANKING ACT

Part IV of the Australian Banking Act reads as follows ( full link provided at end of text ) :

AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT BANKING ACT 1959

Part IV—Gold

40 Operation of Part

(1) This Part shall not be in operation except as provided by this section.

(2) Where the Governor‑General is satisfied that it is expedient so to do, for the protection of the currency or of the public credit of the Commonwealth, the Governor‑General may, by Proclamation, declare that this Part, or such of the provisions of this Part as are specified in the Proclamation, shall come into operation, and this Part, or the provisions so specified, shall thereupon come into operation.

(3) Where the Governor‑General is satisfied that it is no longer expedient, for the protection of the currency or of the public credit of the Commonwealth, that this Part, or any of the provisions of this Part, should remain in operation, the Governor‑General may, by Proclamation, declare that this Part, or such of the provisions of this Part as are specified in the Proclamation, shall cease to be in operation, and thereupon this Part, or the provisions so specified, shall cease to be in operation.

41 Transfer of gold out of Australia

(1) A person shall not, except with the consent in writing of the Reserve Bank, take or send any gold out of Australia.

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if:

(a) the person contravenes subsection (1); and

(c) there is no instrument in force under section 48 exempting the person from the application of this subsection.

Penalty: 200 penalty units.

Note 1: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility.

Note 2: If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against this subsection, subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 allows a court to impose a fine of up to 5 times the penalty stated above.

(3) An offence against subsection (2) is an indictable offence.

42 Delivery of gold

(1) Subject to this Part, a person who has any gold in the person’s possession or under the person’s control, not being:

(a) gold coins the total value of the gold content of which does not exceed the prescribed amount; or

(b) gold lawfully in the possession of that person for the purpose of being worked or used by that person in connexion with the person’s profession or trade;

shall deliver the gold to the Reserve Bank, or as prescribed, within one month after the gold comes into the person’s possession or under the person’s control or, if the gold is in the person’s possession or under the person’s control on any date on which this Part comes into operation, within one month after that date.

(1A) A person is guilty of an offence if:

(a) the person fails to comply with subsection (1); and

(c) there is no instrument in force under section 48 exempting the person from the application of this subsection.

Penalty: 50 penalty units.

Note 1: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility.

Note 2: If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against this subsection, subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 allows a court to impose a fine of up to 5 times the penalty stated above.

(2) Where a person who has gold lawfully in the person’s possession for the purpose of being worked or used by the person in connexion with the person’s profession or trade ceases to have that purpose in respect of that gold, the person shall deliver the gold to the Reserve Bank, or as prescribed, within one month after the person has ceased to have that purpose in respect of that gold.

(3) A person is guilty of an offence if:

(a) the person fails to comply with subsection (2); and

(c) there is no instrument in force under section 48 exempting the person from the application of this subsection.

Penalty: 50 penalty units.

Note 1: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility.

Note 2: If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against this subsection, subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 allows a court to impose a fine of up to 5 times the penalty stated above.

43 Vesting of gold delivered

All gold delivered in pursuance of section 42 shall thereupon vest in the Reserve Bank absolutely, free from any mortgage, charge, lien, trust or other interest in or affecting the gold, and the Reserve Bank shall pay for the gold, to the person delivering the gold, on behalf of all persons having any interest in the gold, an amount determined in accordance with section 44 and the Reserve Bank shall not be under any liability to any other person claiming any interest in the gold.

44 Payment for gold

The amount to be paid for any gold delivered in pursuance of section 42 shall be an amount determined in accordance with such price as is fixed and published by the Reserve Bank or, at the option of the person delivering the gold, such amount as is determined in an action for compensation against the Reserve Bank.

45 Limitation of sale and purchase of gold

(1) Subject to this Part:

(a) a person shall not sell or otherwise dispose of gold to a person other than the Reserve Bank or a person authorized in writing by the Reserve Bank to purchase gold; and

(b) a person, other than the Reserve Bank or a person so authorized, shall not buy or otherwise obtain gold from any person.

(1A) A person is guilty of an offence if:

(a) the person fails to comply with subsection (1); and

(c) there is no instrument in force under section 48 exempting the person from the application of this subsection.

Penalty: 200 penalty units.

Note 1: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility.

Note 2: If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against this subsection, subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 allows a court to impose a fine of up to 5 times the penalty stated above.

(1B) An offence against subsection (1A) is an indictable offence.

(2) A person may buy gold from the Reserve Bank or from a person authorized in writing by the Reserve Bank to sell gold, and the Reserve Bank or a person so authorized may sell gold to a person, for the purpose of its being worked or used by the purchaser in connexion with the person’s profession or trade.

(3) A person authorized by the Reserve Bank under this section shall comply with such directions relating to gold as are given to the person by the Reserve Bank.

(4) A person is guilty of an offence if:

(a) the person fails to comply with subsection (3); and

(c) there is no instrument in force under section 48 exempting the person from the application of this subsection.

Penalty: 200 penalty units.

Note 1: Chapter 2 of the Criminal Code sets out the general principles of criminal responsibility.

Note 2: If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against this subsection, subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 allows a court to impose a fine of up to 5 times the penalty stated above.

(5) An offence against subsection (4) is an indictable offence.

Full link to 1959 Banking Act : http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2011C ... t#param145
prophecy
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:59 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by prophecy »

Dr Quigley describes the goal of a secret network of world financiers as follows :

" nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each Country and the economy of the World as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the Central Banks of the World acting in concert , by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences "

The elite believe that the "big decisions" are far too important to be left "to the people", and so most of the "international institutions" that have been established by the elite operate independently of the democratic process.

This Situation is International and demands an International response

Below is the text of a 1976 Australian Government press release annoucing the removal of restictions on the ownership and trading of gold in Australia. The attachment to the press release provides a history of controls over gold in Australia.
PRESS RELEASE No 29

EMGARBO 6.00pm

STATEMENT BY THE TREASURER, THE HON PHILLIP LYNCH, M.P.

PRIVATE OWNERSHIP AND SALE OF GOLD BY AUSTRALIAN RESIDENTS
SUSPENSION OF PART IV OF THE BANKING ACT

The Treasurer, Mr Phillip Lynch, said today that Commonwealth restrictions on the freedom of Australian residents to own, buy and sell gold in Australia had been removed.

He added that current restrictions on the purchase of gold coins had also been removed.

Australian residents could now export and import gold subject to normal exchange control and customs procedures.

Mr Lynch pointed out that legislation existed in some States to regulate gold buying and some dealings in gold.

The Treasurer was commenting on the effect of the suspension of Part IV of the Banking Act 1959-1974 by His Excellency the Administrator in Council on 30 January.

In terms of this part of the Banking Act, gold, apart from wrought gold and gold coins to a limited extent, had to be delivered to the Reserve Bank of Australia within one month of its coming into a person's possession.

The legislation had restricted the sale of gold in Australia only to the Reserve Bank or a person authorised by the bank.

It had also prohibited the export of gold without the Reserve Bank's permission.

Full link to article : http://www.perthmint.com.au/research_information.aspx
prophecy
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:59 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by prophecy »

Here for your information are sections from the Reserve Bank of India ( Central Bank )

3[21-A. Rates of interest charged by banking companies not to be subject to scrutiny by
Courts.
––Notwithstanding anything contained in the Usurious Loans Act, 1918 (10 of 1918),
or any other law relating to indebtedness in force in any State, a transaction between a
banking company and its debtor shall not be reopened by any Court on the ground that the
rate of interest charged by the banking company in respect of such transaction is excessive.]


S. 217 BANKING REGULATION ACT, 1949 39
COMMENTS
Banking company bound to comply with any direction issued by R.B.I.––Under Sec. 21 of the
Banking Regulation Act, 1949, the Reserve Bank has got the power to control advances to be
made by the Banking Companies. When the Reserve Bank is satisfied that it is necessary and
expedient in public interest or Banking policy so to do, it can determine the policy in
relation to advances to be followed by the banking companies generally or any banking
company in particular. The banking companies are bound to follow the policy so determined.
Reserve Bank has also the power to give direction as to the rate of interest and other
terms and conditions on which advances or other financial accommodations may be made or
guarantee given. The circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India regulating rate of
interest chargeable on loans and the manner of charging interest are statutory circulars
issued with laudable purposes and are binding on the banks

Validity of circulars issued by R.B.1.––The circulars issued by R.B.I. were confidential
documents and required the banking companies to transact their businesses in a particular
manner


Full link to Reserve Bank of India Regulations : http://www.nabard.org/pdf/India_Banking ... ct1949.pdf
Guardian
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:01 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by Guardian »

Well wonder what these simulations are for - this was ONLY reported in The Financial Times in London on their main page :

Financial Times dated July 17 2013

"Wall Street is to test its defences against a deadly pandemic as the financial services sector takes part in a series of simulated exercises to prepare for a new wave of global threats.

Banks, broker dealers and asset managers will be asked to show how they would continue to function if up to 30 per cent of their staff were unable to work

Government bodies including the Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA ) and the US Department of Health and Human Services will also take part.

Government agencies including the US Treasury, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security are participating in the war game-like Quantum Dawn 2.

Mr Schimmeck declined to give an exact specification of the threat involved in the drill"

Full link to article : http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6a6ab0ca-ed88 ... abdc0.html
Guardian
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2013 2:01 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by Guardian »

The Swiss Peoples Party last week launched an initiative to prevent the SNB ( Swiss National Bank - Central Bank for Switzerland ) from selling any of its gold reserves and force it to hold at least 20% of its assets in the precious metal.

The initiative has gathered the required 100,000 signatures necessary for a national referendum, the government said last week.

The issue of gold sales by the SNB has been a controversial one and follows the disposal of some of its gold reserves between 2000 and 2008, as part of an agreement among global central banks to reduce their holdings of gold.

The SNB's gold reserves have remained unchanged since 2008 at 1,040 tons. At the end of 2012 the reserves were valued at just over 50 billion Swiss francs ($53.76 billion), representing around 10% of its total assets.

More than 70% of its of the SNB's gold is stored in Switzerland. Around 20% is kept at the Bank of England and around 10% at the Bank of Canada, an arrangement that had been in place for more than 10 years.
oracle
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:51 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by oracle »

Is this just a strange coincidence or what ??

Extract from the Chicago Tribune - July 23 , 2013
Headline : Military conducts training exercises in and around Chicago


"U.S. military personnel are conducting training exercises in and around Chicago through Thursday, including flying military helicopters in areas around downtown at night.

City agencies are providing support for the “routine military training exercises,” according to a release from the city’s Office of Emergency Management and Communications.

Monday night, many Chicagoans wondered what military helicopters were doing downtown. They are part of the training exercises, a spokeswoman for the office said.

Military personnel including soldiers from the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment--who fly and support military helicopters and specialize in nighttime operations—are among those involved in the “realistic urban training,” said a spokeswoman for the 160th, which is headquartered in Fort Campbell, Kentucky. The exercises also include other units under the U.S. Special Operations Command, based at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla."

Full link to article : http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... 6704.story


Lets hope and pray that it has nothing to do with the news article below :

"Last week, Detroit declared bankruptcy, becoming the largest city in U.S. history to take such drastic action in the face of financial insolvency. A declaration of bankruptcy isn't what most people think it is, though: it's not just a statement of "we're broke!" It's actually a way for the city to clear its slate of all financial obligations and not pay the retirees it owes.

What are the largest financial obligations the city facing? Pensions. $3.5 billion worth of pensions, to be exact.

Yes, Detroit owes former government employees -- teachers, firefighters, cops and more -- a whopping $3.5 billion in current and future payments. Except Detroit doesn't have $3.5 billion to pay the pensions. The city is in a state of economic collapse"

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/041298_unfun ... z2ZynieEjk
prophecy
Posts: 99
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:59 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by prophecy »

Well just in case you had any doubt here it is in black and white from the Elite controlled UK based Daily Telegraph - who is really in control and it is definitely not the Government :

Title : " We finally got our our Cyprus money back " ( Check out the article they still don't have access to it and "lost" € 15,000 Euros in the process )

"Bank of Cyprus said recently it had received permission from the Cypriot Central Bank to look at splitting the bank into a retail unit and an asset management company"

It has been more than 100 days since the banks shut. The Central Bank of Cyprus and the troika – the European Union, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund – are currently deciding the final restructuring of the banks, including the final losses on uninsured deposits and when capital controls should be lifted.

Full link to article : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/pers ... -back.html


" received permission from the Cypriot Central Bank " :

In 1963 the Central Bank of Cyprus was established under the Central Bank of Cyprus Law empowered with authorities and responsibilities customarily assigned to all central banks. ( Privately held - same share holders as Bank of England and the Federal Reserve in the USA - http://lawfulpath.com/ref/federal_reserve.shtml )

The Central Bank of Cyprus was established in 1963, shortly after Cyprus gained its independence, as an autonomous institution in accordance with the Central Bank of Cyprus Law 1963 and the relevant articles of the Constitution

Today the Bank is governed by the Central Bank of Cyprus Laws 2002-2007, which ensure the Bank’s independence ( privately held - http://lawfulpath.com/ref/federal_reserve.shtml ) as well as compatibility with the relevant provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Community and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank.

The Central Bank of Cyprus is a member of the Bank of Internatial Settlements ( http://www.bis.org/cbanks.htm )

The Bank for International Settlements is a private organization that was founded by the global elite and it operates for the benefit of the global elite, and it is intended to be one of the key cornerstones of the emerging one world economic system.

Unfortunately, the global elite seem absolutely obsessed with the idea of a global currency, a one world economic system and a global government - None of those things will happen this year, but that is where we are moving towards in the End Game . With each new crisis that arises, the solutions that we will be given will always involve more centralization and more globalization.
oracle
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:51 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by oracle »

Extract from www.moneyweek.com concerning pensions in the UK

Did the Supreme Court just write down your pension?

I can’t believe what’s happening… one of the most important changes ever made to pension law has just gone down without anyone batting an eyelid. This is a disaster for millions in this country. But it’s barely been reported in the press!
The Supreme Court just ruled that if a company goes into liquidation, pension obligations won’t be considered priority creditors any longer. They’ll now rank with all the other flimsy unsecured creditors.

With the Detroit bankruptcy still fresh in my mind – you know, the one where pensioners stand to lose some 80% of their retirement pay – this decision means I’m going to change my pension arrangements.

This decision overturns 150 years of precedent law. It’s a massive win for the banks and the finance industry. It means bankers can now pump up businesses (as they have individuals) full of debt, knowing that those pesky pensioners won’t mess up the deal

Defined benefit pension schemes are one of the UK’s greatest achievements of the post-war era. Between the employer and the employee, savings were put away to ensure a comfortable retirement for workers.

Though the schemes have been largely phased out these days, there are still millions of workers and retirees with billions invested in occupational pensions. That number may include you, or someone very close to you.

These pension obligations have always been sacrosanct. After all, a comfortable retirement is what many people are working for. Many give up a bit of salary in lieu of a decent pension. Because they’re so important to workers, pension obligations have always been ranked as a top creditor.

In fact, the case just heard in the Supreme Court was heard at both the High Court and the Court of Appeal first. And in both cases, the sanctity of pension obligations had been upheld. Of course it was… the history is there… and there is consensus that prioritising pensions is the right thing to do.

But the finance industry is a powerful force. They didn’t take the decision of the courts lying down. The administrators of Lehman’s pension fund and Nortel networks took their cases to the Supreme Court… and as I say, they secured a remarkable win for the banks.

After the financial crisis the UK operations of Lehman’s and Nortel were left in ruins. The administrators were left with a lot of creditors to pay. I’m sure they had some very powerful creditors banging on their door!

Now, instead of going along with 150 years of precedent and ensuring pensioners' rights, the administrators thought they’d see if they couldn’t come up with a better deal for the other, more powerful creditors.

But thankfully, the High Court said “No!” The court maintained that pension obligations should be considered a ‘super priority’ claim, and should sit alongside the administrator‘s claim (also top priority… otherwise, why would they do the work?).

But the administrators weren’t to be put off. They took the cases to the Court of Appeal. And guess what, the court upheld pensioners’ rights.

But once again… this wasn’t the answer they were after!

So they took their case to the Supreme Court. And we’ve just witnessed the disastrous outcome of these two cases. Not only are pension obligations to be “de-prioritised”… but they’re now to be thrown into the same pile as unsecured creditors!

This means that the banking industry can now fill companies up with debt… making sure that it’s secured debt, of course… knowing that, if the firm goes kaput, the bank’s claims will rank ahead of any pesky pensioners. As ever, debt creation is the ‘story behind the story’.

As I said, this important case has barely received any airplay. And where it was reported, it was largely seen as brilliant news. Yes folks, isn’t it great that the banks can now lend more and more money to companies, safe in the knowledge that pensioners won’t be there to screw-up these important loans!

To me, this just about sums up everything that’s wrong in the pensions industry, and the general debt addiction in the UK.

Those that could be affected by this decision probably don’t have a clue about what just happened. After all, a pension isn’t something that’ll affect them until much later… and anyway, everything I’ve just talked about probably won’t affect them. Hopefully (hopefully!) your employer, or ex-employer won’t go bust!

But it also shows the great lengths the finance industry will go to, to ensure they can keep injecting debt into the UK economy. Well, this court decision has just helped them achieve their goal. And what’s more, barely anyone noticed!

As I always say, don’t trust anyone in the finance industry. You do what you want, but as for me, I’m going to transfer my occupational pension fund into my own name… away from the company I once worked for.

That’s not a step that many people take. It sounds difficult, running your own pension. But it’s easy. You just need do to a little bit of research… and then follow the plan.

Seems the only Main Stream Media to report on this historic ruling was the Financial Times which buried the story in a small article in their Business Section of the paper :

Extract from the Financial Times - July 24 , 2013 :

" Claims from a corporate pension scheme should not rank above other creditors in insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday, overturning lower court judgments that put pensioners’ interests ahead of others"

Full link to article : http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/a44c7404-f45e ... z2asAmU2X0

Thought for the Day :

" Things do not happen - things are made to happen "

John F Kennedy ( 1917 - 1963 )
oracle
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:51 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by oracle »

This article is written by Adrian Salbuchi who is a well known political analyst, author, speaker and radio/TV commentator in Argentina :

"Remember: the Elites pushing all nations towards World Government need to engineer the CONTROLLED demise of Sovereign Nation-States; and the CONTROLLED demise of municipal governments like Detroit, Los Angeles, Washington DC and 120 other US cities earmarked for bankruptcy

The question is whether declaring nations, provinces, states and municipalities bankrupt and ripe for liquidation is the next Wave of Change that will erode traditional public structures, thus paving the way for that coming World Government. A long-term process echoing the adage of the alchemists of old: “Solve et Coagula” – Dissolve and Re-build – which, by the way, ties in with the British Fabian Society’s idea of doing things gradually and unnoticed rather than suddenly and painfully.

So, what’s up? Basically, that Anne Krueger’s ( IMF ) concept of setting up the international legal framework that would allow bankruptcy procedures to be imposed on whole nations is again in the forefront.

In practice, as the IMF’s No. 2 officer, Krueger’s proposal was to introduce a sort of Chapter 11 mechanism permitting orderly management of the transition of countries defaulting on their sovereign debts, back into paying by steering their Nation-States into controlled national bankruptcy.

The implicit objective is to ensure that Sovereign Bond creditors – hedge funds, vulture funds, giant megabanks like Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, CitiCorp, JPMorganChase, HSBC, and the IMF itself – can exert huge leverage taking priority in cashing in on the monies sucked out of a Nation’s taxpayers’ (workers’), central banks, mineral, oil & gas wealth, and other resources and reserves.

That would “legally” permit turning Argentina upside down so that it not only gives up every last Dollar but, more importantly, its immense natural resources, a most attractive prospect for the Global Power Elite, as long it does not wreak havoc or derails their long-term plan of the controlled deconstruction of sovereign nation-states – Arab and (coming) Latin American “Springs” included - as part of the coming World Government they are engineering.

Full link to article : http://rt.com/op-edge/money-mass-slavery-debt-223/

As if horrific debt crises caused by artificially created unsustainable debt burdens could ever be resolved by taking on/imposing ever higher, heavier, long-term debt. One can almost hear the sucking sound in the dark recesses of the global financial system… "

Modern mass slavery couldn’t have been better thought out…!
oracle
Posts: 180
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:51 am

Re: What are THEY planning for us ??

Post by oracle »

Has the World gone mad or is it just me - Russia recently passed a new law "Russian President Vladimir Putin in June signed into law legislation that punishes the dissemination of information about homosexuality to minors ( under 18 )"

Now check out the reaction from gay activists and from President Obama !! :

"MOSCOW -- A new law banning "homosexual propaganda" in Russia is raising concerns about the state of human rights in a country already notorious for silencing dissent.

It is now "illegal to spread information about non-traditional sexual behavior" to minors (under 18), and there are hefty fines for those who disobey. Foreigners are also subject to fines and can be deported.

Full link to article : http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013 ... kdown?lite

Stephen Fry :

British actor Stephen Fry called for Russia to be barred from hosting the Games in the Black Sea resort while gay rights campaigners handed over a 320,000-signature petition to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) urging it to condemn the law.

Russian President Vladimir Putin in June signed into law legislation that punishes the dissemination of information about homosexuality to minors ( under 18 )


Not to be outdone the latest pronouncement ( in masonic speak ) from David Cameron :

" I want to export gay marriage around the world .......... That is a great achievement . That's not my measure ; that is an internationally recognized measure "

Full link to article in Daily Telegraph : http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politic ... meron.html

President Obama :

Obama also lashed out at Russia over a recent law criminalizing the dissemination of information about homosexuality to minors, which critics fear could legitimize widespread discrimination.


The Russian measure, signed into law by Putin, introduces fines of up to 5,000 rubles ($156) for citizens who disseminate information about homosexuality to minors

Full link to artcle : http://www.afp.com/en/node/1028916


Well the hidden power(s) behind are doing all they can to break down the traditional family unit - at first I thought this was just another weird conspiracy theory but not so sure now .........................................
Post Reply