Ticketted for "driving on a suspended drivers license"
Ticketted for "driving on a suspended drivers license"
Heres the deal, back in 2010, I mailed by certified mail affidavits (properly notarized, signed in blue ink with fingerprint in red ink), these affidavits were my 'Declaration of Right to travel" and my Commercial affidavit oath and affirmation, actual and constructive notice of fact that I was hereby revoking, rescinding, refuting, cancelling and making void ab initio the DL Contract to the head of the motor vehicle department. It was not rebutted. I then publicly recorded these documents for all to see, notice to agent is notice to all principles and notice to principle is notice to all agents. This all according to UCC Law of Contracts. I now have a citation for "driving on a suspended/cancelled drivers license. I mentioned and showed these copies of the docs to the prosecutors office agent and not only could he not comprehend them he had no interest whatsoever in them. Im frustrated, any suggestions?
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:44 pm
Re: Ticketted for "driving on a suspended drivers license"
What was the outcome of this?
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2017 7:53 pm
Re: Ticketted for "driving on a suspended drivers license"
Respectfully Yes. Stop trying to settle civil UCC contract matters in a Statutory Regulation that does not operate under the uniform commercial code.
Your Declaration of Right to Travel means what to a prosecutor of a statutory scheme? Nothing.
Who is saying you don't have a right to travel? Nobody.
What they are saying is there are regulations codified in a statutory scheme called a transportation code or some variation of that name, that pertain to the privileged use of the roadway, and that you violated something contained in them. That privileged use talking about the commercial for hire use of the roads. Thats what you are accused of, not that you dont have the right to travel. Heck, even a tractor trailer driver has the right to travel.
You are a private individual, Not engaged in a regulable activity subject to transportation code. Therefore they lack the jurisdiction of the subject matter. They are presuming subject matter jurisdiction. They are assuming in personam Jurisdiction. If one finds themselves in this precarious situation, one must challenge the courts jurisdiction. One must realize that the court/and or prosecution is going to assert they have jurisdiction territorially, personally, and under the subject matter and offer no evidence to the contrary. one must object demanding the prosecution to produce evidence of the argument supporting or asserting their claim to the jurisdiction. one must realize the court/prosecution will attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the accused and the accused should object to the prosecution/court attempting to shift the burden of proof which they cannot do.
THis is a very large topic, one that i am studying very closely. Good luck in you fight and hope to hear how it goes.
Your Declaration of Right to Travel means what to a prosecutor of a statutory scheme? Nothing.
Who is saying you don't have a right to travel? Nobody.
What they are saying is there are regulations codified in a statutory scheme called a transportation code or some variation of that name, that pertain to the privileged use of the roadway, and that you violated something contained in them. That privileged use talking about the commercial for hire use of the roads. Thats what you are accused of, not that you dont have the right to travel. Heck, even a tractor trailer driver has the right to travel.
You are a private individual, Not engaged in a regulable activity subject to transportation code. Therefore they lack the jurisdiction of the subject matter. They are presuming subject matter jurisdiction. They are assuming in personam Jurisdiction. If one finds themselves in this precarious situation, one must challenge the courts jurisdiction. One must realize that the court/and or prosecution is going to assert they have jurisdiction territorially, personally, and under the subject matter and offer no evidence to the contrary. one must object demanding the prosecution to produce evidence of the argument supporting or asserting their claim to the jurisdiction. one must realize the court/prosecution will attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the accused and the accused should object to the prosecution/court attempting to shift the burden of proof which they cannot do.
THis is a very large topic, one that i am studying very closely. Good luck in you fight and hope to hear how it goes.
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:08 pm
Re: Ticketted for "driving on a suspended drivers license"
Bluddysnoman,
Respectfully, the courts only follow REAL law of the type taught in law schools and used by governments. Courts do not operate under (and will never follow) amateur legal theories of the type used by anti-government protesters.
For the truth about the REAL law as it relates to driving and driver's licenses, read the SECOND (2nd) and THIRD (3rd) post in the "Eddie Craig" thread below. Also, read the TWELFTH (12th) post in the "Rod Class" thread below.
EVERYTHING ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR, CARL MILLER, AND HIS TEACHINGS ON WACCOBB.NET https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthre ... d-Champion
EVERYTHING ABOUT EDDIE CRAIG AND HIS TEACHINGS ON PROJECTAVALON.NET.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax
EVERYTHING ABOUT ROD CLASS AND HIS TEACHINGS ON PROJECTAVALON.NET.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthr ... any-hoaxes
EVERYTHING ABOUT DEBORAH TAVARES AND HER TEACHINGS ON WACCOBB.NET. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation)
Best Regards,
Snoop
Respectfully, the courts only follow REAL law of the type taught in law schools and used by governments. Courts do not operate under (and will never follow) amateur legal theories of the type used by anti-government protesters.
For the truth about the REAL law as it relates to driving and driver's licenses, read the SECOND (2nd) and THIRD (3rd) post in the "Eddie Craig" thread below. Also, read the TWELFTH (12th) post in the "Rod Class" thread below.
EVERYTHING ABOUT CONSTITUTIONAL SCHOLAR, CARL MILLER, AND HIS TEACHINGS ON WACCOBB.NET https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showthre ... d-Champion
EVERYTHING ABOUT EDDIE CRAIG AND HIS TEACHINGS ON PROJECTAVALON.NET.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...y-sheriff-hoax
EVERYTHING ABOUT ROD CLASS AND HIS TEACHINGS ON PROJECTAVALON.NET.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthr ... any-hoaxes
EVERYTHING ABOUT DEBORAH TAVARES AND HER TEACHINGS ON WACCOBB.NET. https://www.waccobb.net/forums/showt...s-depopulation)
Best Regards,
Snoop
Re: Ticketted for "driving on a suspended drivers license"
Ask WHO is moving the court against you ?..Then demand that you confront them on the supposed TRESPASS or HARM you committed against them....Listen to this MAN ....not PERSON... Remember to state at beginning you are MAKING A SPECIAL APPEARENCE https://www.bitchute.com/video/jJWC27WcRwaJ/
Last edited by chilsam on Sat Jan 06, 2024 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.