Edward Snowden is a fraud

Use this Section to showcase media stories which turn out to be lies, misrepresentations, or false flags.
Post Reply
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Edward Snowden is a fraud

Post by Firestarter » Tue Mar 21, 2017 4:16 pm

A lot of people already know this...
I’ve never paid much interest to Edward Snowden, because he exposed nothing I didn’t known already. For years I thought he is nothing but a wannabe whistleblower (that just doesn’t know any real secrets).
Only recently I did an investigation, to conclude that Snowden is a fraud, still working for the CIA.
What speaks for Snowden (and Wikileaks) is that they don’t spread blatant lies; so they don’t misinform us (like some of the most famous conspiracy theorists).
It’s also very suspicious that Snowden became really famous. All “real” whistleblowers die relatively unknown.


LIMITED HANGOUT OPERATION
Edward Snowden first shocked the world in June 2013 by telling that the NSA wiretaps not only US citizens but the entire world. This was already known since December, 2005 from an article by the New York Times - the wiretap then called Operation Stellar Wind.
On June 6, 2013 Glenn Greenwald and Snowden delivered a presentation on PRISM, NSA’s program to read e-mails. This was more than a decade after we had heard of Echelon, and after the post-9/11 Patriot Act. Only the most naïve still believe that their e-mails are secure.
Webster Tarpley calls this a limited hangout operation: http://tarpley.net/2013/06/19/how-to-id ... operation/


TOO MANY COINCIDENCES
Jon Rappoport has described some of the coincidences in Edward Snowden, to conclude that he’s a fraud.
Snowden has the perfect image: young, thin, and bespectacled. Because of Hollywood movies we know how a tech-whistleblower looks...
In 2003, aged 19 without a high school diploma, Snowden enlists in the Army. Snowden swiftly breaks both legs in a training exercise and is discharged from the Army. If they hired him for a computer wizard, why did they let him go?
Swiftly (circa 2003?), Snowden gets a job as security guard for an NSA facility at the University of Maryland. Shortly thereafter (also 2003?), Snowden shifts jobs and goes to work for the CIA.
At only 23 years old, the CIA sends Snowden to Geneva with diplomatic immunity. Snowden is in charge of maintaining computer-network security (without a high school diploma). Snowden witnesses that the CIA “turns” a Swiss banker. In 2009, Snowden leaves the CIA (because he was disgusted at how the CIA turned the Swiss banker?), or that’s what we’re supposed to believe...

Snowden next works for 2 private defence contractors, Dell and Booze Allen Hamilton. In this latter job, Snowden works at the NSA. As an outsider, he has access to top secret NSA data. So we must believe that an outsider like Snowden has access to all of this secret information. But of course Snowden is a computer wizard that can hack anything, while the NSA only employs dumbos without high school diplomas…
Snowden takes medical leave one day and flies from Hawaii to Hong Kong, where he arrives on May 20, 2013. The NSA, CIA and FBI know nothing about his escape…
Snowden contacts some reporters and on June 1 three reporters of The Guardian — Glenn Greenwald, Ewen MacAskill, and Laura Poitras — begin interviewing Snowden for a week.
On June 5, The Guardian publishes its first article on the NSA leaks. On June 9, The Guardian first reveals Snowden’s identity. Still no intelligence agency can find him…
On June 12, The South China Post publishes an interview with Snowden.
On June 23, Snowden flies to Moscow with Wikileaks’ Sarah Harrison without any problems.

According to this story Snowden was a system operator; these are mostly techies that don’t have a clue on the files they have access to. How did he know which files to take and how could he tell the journalists anything interesting?
From 2003 to 2009 Snowden worked for the CIA as a system operator. In this time he did have access to confidential files. When he didn’t work for the NSA he copied thousands of confidential files, and escaped.
Computers are very good at keeping record on anything that happens. Which means that he couldn’t copy this much data unnoticed, and then get away.

For more than a month (May 20-June 23), the NSA, and other agencies of the US government, couldn’t catch Snowden: https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015 ... d-snowden/


CONCLUSION
I don’t even understand how a whistleblower, that wants to stay hidden, can take a plane. Airports are just about the most closely watched places in the world. To add injury to insult 3 reporters from The Guardian fly from New York to Hong Kong to interview Snowden, in between interviews already publish their first article, and then he’s also interviewed by The South China Post.
Then after being interviewed and having his identity revealed Snowden flies from Hong Kong to Russia.
Bizarrely Edward Snowden went to Hong Kong that is in the centre of the opium/heroin trade. That’s about the last place in the world to go, for a white man that wants to stay hidden...

A story like this would prove that the NSA doesn’t spy on us at all. It’s almost like a Hollywood blockbuster, that doesn’t hold up when you check the story...

There is also a strange visual thing about Snowden. Snowden has been shown over and over again with a missing nose pad on his glasses (his left side), which still hasn’t been fixed. Are we supposed to believe that he cannot afford to get his glasses fixed?
The first picture is from 2013, the second from 2016.
Image
Image
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Edward Snowden is a fraud

Post by Firestarter » Wed Mar 22, 2017 2:25 pm

Was I wrong to think that this thread is really innocuous?
The similar story was too hot for Ron Paul, so was removed to the members only “Hot topics” on Ronpaulforums.com.

Even more strange is that the second photo that I posted (that shows that Snowden still had a missing nose pad on his glasses more than 3 years after he first shocked the world) was removed.

There are even some “patriots” that accuse Edward Snowden for being a terrible traitor (anything to make him more credible).

See for example the following story:
The report by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (where I worked for five years) found what many of us have long argued: Snowden is not a whistleblower; he is a disgruntled former intelligence employee who did enormous damage to U.S. national security.
(…)
The most well-known Snowden disclosure concerned the NSA metadata program, which collects phone records but not the contents of phone calls. Although this program has long been overseen by the congressional intelligence committees and helped halt several terrorist attacks against the United States, Snowden’s leaks about it led to a hysterical and uninformed reaction by the press and some members of Congress that led Congress and President Obama to implement major restrictions, which have made this program much more difficult for intelligence officers to use to identify and track terrorist suspects.
(…)
Putting aside that Snowden didn’t bother trying to raise his supposed concern about this program through legal channels, the facts are that the vast majority of court decisions on this program upheld it as legal, Congress and the Justice Department have monitored it, and only very minor abuses were discovered. To read more on this issue, see my May 2015 NRO article “NSA Data Collection: Necessary or Unconstitutional.”
While the unclassified report summary does not give specifics of how Snowden’s leaks benefited U.S. enemies and terrorists (that is probably detailed in the classified version available to all House members), U.S. intelligence officials have publicly stated that Snowden’s leaks have allowed ISIS and al-Qaeda to evade detection by Western intelligence services. Former CIA director James Woolsey has called for Snowden to receive the death penalty because his leaks of NSA monitoring techniques helped the ISIS-inspired terrorists who committed the November 2015 Paris terrorist attacks conceal their electronic communications.
(…)
The Washington Post’s Walter Pincus had a similar take when he wrote that “a real whistleblower would have selected the documents to be published, made certain that they didn’t harm national security, and remained in the country to face the consequences of his actions.”
(...)
The report summary also notes that while Snowden claims congressional testimony by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper in March 2013 was the reason he began massive disclosures of U.S. secrets to the press, Snowden began stealing this information eight months earlier. The unclassified report does not mention a related fact: that Glenn Greenwald, a journalist who facilitated Snowden’s leaks, says in his 2014 book No Place to Hide that Snowden first tried to contact him on December 1, 2012
” - http://www.nationalreview.com/article/4 ... not-pardon
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 761
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Wikileaks - Rothschild operation

Post by Firestarter » Sat Mar 24, 2018 6:15 pm

Wikileaks appears to be a Rothschild front...
In 2008, Rothschild magazine The Economist gave Julian Assange its New Media Award.
The Rothschild family is a major shareholder in The Economist. Sir Evelyn de Rothschild was chairman of The Economist from 1972 to 1989. His wife Lynn Forester de Rothschild currently sits on its board.

In 2008, Wikileaks first disclosed some of Rudolf Elmer’s (former employee of Bank Julius Baer) material naming ten clients of Swiss Bank Julius Baer, claiming that they evaded taxes.
Julius Baer sued and got a court injunction to effectively shut down Wikileaks.org. Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn the judge’s ruling, which got Wikileaks back online.
Julius Baer got bad press for its failed attempt at censorship. Many clients left the bank afraid to be exposed and prosecuted for tax evasion and money laundering. Julius Baer shares dropped 60% during the next 10 months.
On 4 December 2008, the 52-year-old CEO of Julius Baer, Alex Widmer, was unexpectedly found dead.

On 17 January 2011, Julian Assange held a press conference at The Frontline Club where Rudolf Elmer gave Assange private files from the bank’s Cayman Islands’ operation. On October 25 and July 27, Assange was a speaker at Frontline Trust.
After a time in “real” prison, Assange was “imprisoned” in a countryside mansion of Vaughan Smith, the owner of Frontline Trust.
Frontline is funded by Rothschild agent George Soros’ organisation, Open Society Institute. The director of the OSI, Richard Katz, was director of NM Rothschild & Sons for 16 years. Other board members, like Nils Taube, also hold positions in Rothschild banks.

Jemima Khan (nee Goldsmith) posted 20 000 pounds ($32 000) for the bail of Julian Assange. She’s genetically related to the Rothschilds and a sister-in-law. Jemima Khan’s brother, Ben, wed Kate Rothschild in 2003 and her other brother, Zac, a new British MP, was (is?) living with Alice Rothschild (Kate’s sister).
Jemima Khan’s banker, publisher father, the late James Goldsmith, was a cousin to the Rothschilds. George Soros was a business partner of James Goldsmith.

Julian Assange’s lawyer is Mark Stephens of major London law firm Finers Stephens Innocent, which is also a legal adviser to the Rothschild’s Waddesdon Trust.

The Guardian and The New York Times are media partners of Assange’s.
The chairman of the Guardian Media Group (owner of The Guardian) is Paul Myners, who had previously worked for NM Rothschild Limited & Sons Ltd. Guardian Guardian Media Group is owned by Scott Trust of which Anthony Salz was appointed a trustee in 2009. In 2011, Salz is executive vice-chairman of the investment Bank Rothschild.
The chairman of The New York Times is Arthur Sulzberger Jr., a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (that for years was controlled by Rockefeller). Sulzberger is the grandson of Arthur Hays Sulzberger who served as a trustee for the Rockefeller Foundation: http://puppet99.com/p/1
(archived here: http://archive.is/v8aoM)


I’ve found a strange story that appears to originate from the notoriously Fake – YourNewsWire.
The bizarre thing is that it is based on “real” Wikileaks cable that looks like it’s been written by a fake news writer: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/08DAKAR588_a.html#
(archived here: http://archive.is/3xOGH)

See the following excerpts.
The widely held belief is that the goal is to help Karim Wade and his associates gain control of the shares as a massive money-laundering scheme.
(…)
2. (S) On May 2, Sogue Diarisso (strictly protect), a senior official at the Ministry of Finance and a close confidante to Finance Minister Abdoulaye Diop, presented Econ Counselor with the outline of a secret and corrupt plan for the sale of the GOS's approximately 28 percent stake in Sonatel, Senegal's largest telecommunications company (now majority owned by France Telecom/Orange). Much of what Diarisso reported was confirmed in EconCouns's subsequent meeting with IMF Resident Representative Alex Segura (also strictly protect).
(…)
5. (S) According to Diarisso, with the DGMP's waiver, the government can now conclude an exclusive deal with the investment bank Rothschild (which was also noted in the press articles) to act as the advisor and sole agent for the sale, including "deciding" who gets the opportunity to buy the shares. The widely held belief in Dakar is that the main beneficiary will be President Wade's son (and Special Economic Advisor) Karim who, along with his cronies (close business partners in Kuwait) and whatever shell companies they may have now or will establish, would be granted an insider opportunity to buy the shares.
(…)
As Diarisso noted, "the country can accept Karim's frequent efforts to launder CFA one billion or 5 billion (USD 2-10 million), but this is beyond acceptable."
(…)
7. (SBU) Adding to the fiscal irresponsibility of this scheme, the arrangement with Rothschild's reportedly includes paying the bank a 1.5 percent commission on the value of the shares, for a cool and corrupt USD 15 million.

Here’s an August 2016 story based on this (fake?) Wikileaks cable: https://conspiracydailyupdate.com/2016/ ... news-wire/
Here´s a Reddit thread on this story: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/com ... lar_money/
The sale didn´t take place: https://www.reuters.com/article/senegal ... 3020090501

The most interesting “real” story that I’ve found is that in 2012, Karim Wade was prosecuted for corruption: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/featur ... 55156.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/uahay)
Karim Wade has been accused of unscrupulous business dealings after his father installed him as the Minister of State for International Cooperation, Land Use, Air Transport and Infrastructure - a position locally referred to as the "Minister of Heaven and Earth".
According to a March 2009 communiqué from the US Embassy in Dakar titled "Senegal's Karim Wade - Heir Apparent?" released by Wikileaks, he was known as "Mr Ten Per Cent" in diplomatic circles - a moniker that had changed to "Mr fifteen per cent" by 2007.
"It is widely believed that Karim has embezzled a significant amount of funds," the cable said.
A French presidential adviser referred to Wade as "corrupt and dishonest", according to another US embassy cable dated September 2009.
The former government's plan to sell $1.2 billion in shares of telecom company SONATEL - Senegal's most profitable company - was also noted by the US government in 2008.

In a 2009 Wikileaks cable, which looks real, besides Karim Wade also Rothschild and Sonatal appear: https://wikileaks.org/plusd/cables/09DAKAR290_a.html
(archived here: http://archive.is/mRD5H)
9. (C) Karim also effectively parlays contacts from his days as an investment banker with UBS Warburgh in Paris and London. Most major projects in Senegal are handled by financial advisors close to Karim - Morocco's BMCE Capital (commonly referred to as "Karim's Bank"), and Rothschild's Bank of London ("Karim's special bank"). BMCE is in charge of the new airport, the toll road, the sale of the President Meridien Hotel, and many other projects. Rothschild's is implicated in a backroom scheme to sell the government's shares of Sonatel Stock and other non-transparent deals.
Post Reply