Cancer Everywhere... But Not in the Presidential Suite

General healthcare discussion, and Obamacare news.
Please note that specific help and support for Gregory Allan's book "How to Survive Hospital Costs Without Insurance" must be directed to the private Forum used for that purpose.
Post Reply
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 689
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:24 am

Cancer Everywhere... But Not in the Presidential Suite

Post by editor » Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:45 am

I like Janet Phelan, she attacks emotional issues with plain statistics and facts. Here's another article of hers that demonstrates outside-the-box thinking.
Cancer, Cancer Everywhere ... But Not In The Presidential Suite
by Janet Phelan
October 31, 2016

keywords: cancer, epidemic, elite, cure, statistics, implausible

A recent cancer symposium, with a surgical focus, met in Boston to discuss how surgical oncology is experiencing "an exciting evolution and the ways in which we treat cancer are changing."

However, there are indications that the cure for cancer may have already been found and that those who have it are keeping it close to their chests.

In order to support this contention, which may be seen as alarming and extreme, one must look at the rates of cancer among the general population and compare these to the rates of cancer deaths among world leaders.

And the latter is almost non-existent.

In the US, cancer is the second leading cause of death, exceeded only by heart disease. According to recently breaking news, Australia now lists cancer as its leading cause of death. In the rest of the developed world, cancer is near the top of the list. A recent list published by the World Cancer Research Fund International shows that Denmark leads the pack in terms of cancer rates. Indeed, the list of the fifty countries with the highest cancer rates might lead one to believe that cancer is a disease of prosperity. Conspicuously absent from the list are countries in the Third World—in particular Africa.

Cancer will fell approximately ¼ of all those living in the developed world. However, this particular manifestation of the Grim Reaper gives world leaders a wide berth.

Since 1980, when the exiled Shah of Iran succumbed to lymphatic cancer in Egypt, the deaths by cancer of those leading their nations can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And what is most telling about those on this short list is where they stood on the political spectrum.

Hugo Chavez, the colorful and controversial President of Venezuela between 1999-2013, was a Socialist and prominent adversary of US foreign policy and neo-liberalism. Before succumbing to cancer in 2013, Chavez made a much publicized radio announcement in which he speculated that the US government gave him cancer.

Chavez has been quoted as saying, "Would it be so strange that they've invented the technology to spread cancer and we won't know about it for 50 years?" He is also quoted as saying "Fidel [Castro] always told me, 'Chávez take care. These people have developed technology. You are very careless. Take care what you eat, what they give you to eat ... a little needle and they inject you with I don't know what.' "

Since his death Venezuela has crumbled into economic chaos.

Vaclav Havel, who was the last president of Czechoslovakia and the first President of the Czech Republic, is somewhat of a more ambiguous character. While he is seen as being a pivotal player in breaking up the Soviet bloc, and therefore bringing what is popularly termed "democracy" to a formerly Communist country, he may have also been serving US and CIA interests, either unintentionally or otherwise.

In his period of political dissidence, prior to ascending to power, Havel was imprisoned a number of times, the longest incarceration being four years. As President, Havel was instrumental in dismantling the Warsaw Pact and expanding NATO into Eastern European countries. Havel died of lung cancer in 2011 at the age of 75.

Jack Layton, the head of Canada's New Democratic Party, succumbed to "an unspecified, newly diagnosed" cancer in 2011.

The NDP occupies the furthest left of Canada's political spectrum. Indeed, there has never been an NDP head of state in Canada.

So when the NDP swept the national parliamentary elections in 2011, winning 103 seats, the NDP became Canada's Official Opposition. Layton's tenancy as head of the opposition was short lived, however. Layton succumbed to cancer less than four months later, passing on in August of 2011. He had been committed to ousting the conservative Harper government. Following Layton's death, the NDP tumbled from its position and currently occupies third place in Canada's parliament.

As Prime Minister of the tiny island of Barbados, David Thompson could only marginally have been considered a world leader. The population of Barbados is less than 300,000, mostly black. Barbados, also known as "Little England," is an independent state with the British monarch as hereditary head of state.

Thompson was in office from 2008 until October of 2010, when he passed away from pancreatic cancer, one of the most deadly forms of the Big C.

Statistically, since cancer is listed as cause of death in roughly ¼ of all deaths, one might logically expect that one quarter of the US Presidents and one quarter of the US Vice Presidents, to pick one example, would have cancer listed as cause of death. With 44 Presidents and 47 Vice Presidents, one might think that somewhere in the realm of 24 or so might have succumbed to cancer.

However, there are none. Zero. Zilch. A search for cancer as a cause of death for German, French or British leaders in the past forty years produces only one name, that of former French President Francois Mitterrand, who succumbed to prostate cancer in 1996 at the age of 80. Mitterrand was the first French President who was a Socialist and he led the nation for fourteen years, as its longest serving President.

Since the 1972 throat cancer death of Edward VIII—who abdicated the throne in 1936—no members of British royalty have died of cancer.

In October of this year, the World Cancer Leaders' Summit will be convening in Paris, France. The announcement for this Summit states that "The World Cancer Leaders' Summit brings together global decision makers who can shape the way our generation addresses the task of eliminating cancer as a life threatening disease for future generations." Their announcement also states, "The Summit plays a pivotal role in this portfolio of global events by ensuring that the 2020 targets detailed in the World Cancer Declaration are appropriately recognised and addressed at the highest political levels."

However, those at the "highest political levels" are often seen as escaping repercussions for criminal behavior and worse. The idea of the "Teflon-coated" political elite is an idea that has now gained general—albeit grim—acceptance.

Given the probability that the cure may already exist, in light of the unusual lack of incidence of fatal cancers afflicting the powerful, one might want to ask the Summit if the world leaders might be willing to share ... please?

Janet Phelan is an investigative journalist whose articles have appeared in the Los Angeles Times, The San Bernardino County Sentinel, The Santa Monica Daily Press, The Long Beach Press Telegram, Oui Magazine and other regional and national publications. Janet specializes in issues pertaining to legal corruption and addresses the heated subject of adult conservatorship, revealing shocking information about the relationships between courts and shady financial consultants. She also covers issues relating to international bioweapons treaties. Her poetry has been published in Gambit, Libera, Applezaba Review, Nausea One and other magazines. Her first book, The Hitler Poems, was published in 2005. She is also the author of a tell-all book EXILE, (also available as an ebook). She currently resides abroad.
A good read, according to Ms. Phelan: Cancer - Step Outside the Box, by Ty Bolinger
User avatar
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Cancer Everywhere... But Not in the Presidential Suite

Post by Firestarter » Sun Nov 20, 2016 4:29 pm

editor wrote:A good read, according to Ms. Phelan: Cancer - Step Outside the Box, by Ty Bolinger
The link doesn't work.
I've been trying for some time to expose the cancer epidemic for a fraud (but without finding the "smoking gun"). In the book “Inventing The AIDS Virus” (1996) by Peter Duesberg, and Bryan Ellison (724 pages, 37MB to download) is also interesting information about cancer (Duesberg came from cancer research before he became an AIDS-whistleblower): ...
User avatar
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Cancer Everywhere... But Not in the Presidential Suite

Post by Firestarter » Mon Nov 21, 2016 10:00 am

editor wrote:A good read, according to Ms. Phelan: Cancer - Step Outside the Box, by Ty Bolinger
The link doesn't work. Here is the book: ... he.Box.pdf
User avatar
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Cancer Everywhere... But Not in the Presidential Suite

Post by Firestarter » Wed Jul 12, 2017 4:59 pm

Recent “scientific” research on 20 breast cancer patients shows that chemotherapy might cause cancer.
One of the most common ways to treat breast cancer is to administer chemotherapy and then to perform surgery to remove the tumor. It is believed that in addition to reducing tumor size, the chemotherapy drugs reduce the chance of the cancer spreading to other parts of the body. But now, it appears that that the latter assumption may not only be wrong, but the opposite of what actually occurs.
Researchers from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the US have found indications that chemotherapy given before surgery increases the risk for metastasis in breast cancer victims.
The researchers found elevated levels of Tumor MicroEnvironment of Metastasis (TMEM) in all the victims that had received chemotherapy prior to surgery.
The researchers also found that the chemotherapy drug paclitaxel causes bone marrow cells with TIE2 receptors to move to tumours, which results in TMEM formation. When the TIE2 was blocked with drugs, the number of TMEM sites in chemotherapy-treated mice didn’t increase.

The researchers conclude that more research needs to be done to ascertain if chemotherapy drugs cause cancers to spread.
In the meantime, it may be wise that doctors don’t prescribe chemotherapy before performing surgery on cancer patients: ... tasis.html

In the following images, the arrows show sites that promote cancer spreading inside breast tumours after poisoning with chemotherapy: ... 745a76.jpg
User avatar
Posts: 1334
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Cancer Everywhere... But Not in the Presidential Suite

Post by Firestarter » Mon Nov 20, 2017 5:07 pm

Dr. Farid Fata falsified medical documents and lied to his victims to become a multimillionaire and “earned” some $35 million worth of unnecessary cancer treatments. I haven’t found information on how much money this generated for the medical industry as a whole.
In August 2013, Fata was arrested. Fata later confessed to intentionally diagnosing people with cancer when they were healthy. Fata also administered more dosages of the highly toxic cancer treatment, overtreatment, than should have been given.

In 2014, Fata pleaded guilty to health care fraud, money laundering and conspiracy to give or receive kickbacks.
In July 2015, Dr. Farid Fata was sentenced to 45 years in prison.
The authorities recognised about 553 victims, but admitted that there could be many more.
Some of the victims of Fata were effectively murdered by his treatment. Stanton Richard Lamb, Nancy LaFrance, the father of Ellen Piligiam, and Marianne Lupo, all died…

Oncology nurse Angela Swantek, who worked at one of Fata's clinics, said she first complained to investigators about the doctor's wrongdoings in 2010: ... YEARS.html

A restitution fund of $11.7 million for Fata’s victims was set up – remember that we’re talking about at least $35 million worth of cancer treatment.
US Attorney Barbara McQuade said:
It is our goal is to take all of this money that we recovered from Dr. Fata and return it to the victims in some way.
Some 43 victims got another $8 million from a settlement of their medical malpractice lawsuits. According to attorney Brian McKeen, Michigan law physicians are not required to carry malpractice insurance and those who do only carry up to $200,000 per claim. That’s besides that insurance companies don’t insure for “intentional conduct".
McKeen said:
It is outrageous doctors are allowed to practice with inadequate insurance and hospitals can distance themselves from liability. If you are a victim of a negligent, incompetent or malevolent Michigan physician, the damages are ‘one size fits all.’ How is that fair to the family of a victim whose life was taken, or for a victim who will forever suffer pain and require lifelong care?
The $8 million will be distributed among the victims in September and October by arbitrator Rick Boothman. The money will not be split equally; each case is decided on its own merits.
So some of the victims got nothing, after being stabbed in the backs by their own attorneys…
Ten percent of the total funds are going to the whistle-blower on Fata’s crimes: ... /87340742/

On the following link are the stories of a couple of victims of Farid Fata.
Teddy Howard, 57 said about the legal charade: “We’re victims again. We’re victims of the system now.
You can also read some more about Rhonda Bonk Teague (54), Tim Parkin (56), Michael Ureel (45), and Robert Sobieray (65): ... 105102064/

Here’s the court’s 28 May 2015 “sentencing memorandum” on Fata:
Dr. Farid Fata (Fata) is the most egregious fraudster in the history of this country, measured not by the millions of dollars he stole but by the harm he inflicted on his victims, over 550 identified so far. Rather than healing or easing the suffering of the cancer patients and others who sought his help, Fata administered thousands of unnecessary treatments—a variety of chemical infusions and injections, all with potentially harmful and even deadly side effects—to the patients who entrusted him with their care. He did it entirely for his own benefit.

To accomplish his goal of administering and billing for expensive, unnecessary treatments, Fata had to tell lies. He had to tell thousands upon thousands of lies and perpetrate untold numbers of deceits upon his patients, their family members, his staff, other treating physicians, insurers, and even charitable foundations seeking to assist his patients. The lies Fata told differed in many ways, but were the same in one. Fata’s singular overriding purpose was to persuade, cajole, frighten and deceive his patients into accepting more injections, more infusions, more tests, and any other treatments that he could bill through his solely owned practice, Michigan Hematology Oncology (MHO) and its infusion centers, opened in 2005, and later his pharmacy Vital Pharmacare (Vital) and diagnostic testing facility, United Diagnostics, both opened in 2013. The longer Fata kept patients in his infusion chairs, the more money he made. To Fata, patients were not people. They were profit centers.
Post Reply