Sterilization through Vaccination

General healthcare discussion, and Obamacare news.
Please note that specific help and support for Gregory Allan's book "How to Survive Hospital Costs Without Insurance" must be directed to the private Forum used for that purpose.
User avatar
editor
Site Admin
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:24 am
Contact:

Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by editor » Fri Nov 14, 2014 10:36 am

Is The UN Using Vaccines To Secretly Sterilize Women All Over The Globe?
by Michael Snyder

Original article: http://wp.me/p3c1Bb-ajE


In some areas of the world, purposely cutting off someone's family line is considered to be one of the most wicked things that you can possibly do. But that appears to be precisely what the United Nations is doing. Two UN organizations, the WHO and UNICEF, have just been caught red-handed administering "tetanus vaccines" laced with sterilizing agents to girls and women in Kenya. And as you will see below, this is not the first time that this has happened. Apparently there is a well-coordinated international program to use vaccines to secretly sterilize women in poor countries all over the planet. The United States needs to immediately demand a full investigation of the UN vaccine program, but I wouldn't count on that ever happening under the Obama administration.

There have always been anecdotal stories of women all over the globe being unable to have children after receiving UN vaccines. But now we have scientific proof. Lab tests that were recently conducted found an antigen that causes miscarriages in the vaccines that were being given to girls and women in Kenya. A story that was posted on Life Site News about this caused shockwaves all over the Internet. The following is an excerpt from that report...

Kenya's Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

"We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen," Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. "They were all laced with HCG."

So exactly what is HCG?

The following is how Natural News described what it does...

HCG is a chemical developed by the World Health Organization for sterilization purposes. When injected into the body of a young woman, it causes a pregnancy to be destroyed by the body's own antibody response to the HCG,resulting in a spontaneous abortion. Its effectiveness lasts for years, causing abortions in women up to three years after the injections.

This is an absolutely horrifying scandal, but the mainstream media is totally ignoring it.

Perhaps that is because they agree with what the United Nations is trying to do.

And should we actually be surprised at what the UN is doing? After all, the UN has publicly declared in writing that it intends to reduce population growth in Kenya...

The United Nations and its oftentimes barbaric population-control apparatus are under fire again after releasing a deeply controversial report claiming that the African population of Kenya is too large and growing too quickly. To deal with the supposed "challenge," as the UN and its "partners" in the national government put it, international bureaucrats are demanding stepped up efforts to brainwash Kenyan women into wanting fewer children. Also on the agenda: more taxpayer-funded "family-planning" and "reproductive-health" schemes to reduce the number of Africans to levels considered "desirable" by the UN.

Critics promptly lambasted the plot as undisguised eugenics, with some experts calling it a true example of the "war on women." Among other concerns, analysts outraged by the report noted that the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and the establishment's fiendish efforts to slash human populations — especially those considered "undesirable" by self-appointed guardians of the gene pool — have a long and sordid history going back decades. Today, the agenda marches on, as illustrated in the latest UN report calling for drastically reduced numbers of Kenyans.

When very evil people tell you that they intend to do something, you should take them very seriously.

And without a doubt, the UN is evil. To use vaccines to secretly sterilize women against their will is almost too wicked to describe with words.

But the UN will keep doing this until we demand that they stop. Back in the 1990s, similar sterilization campaigns using tetanus vaccines were being conducted in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. The following comes from thinktwice.com...

Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:
  • Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren't men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?
  • Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there — in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been "contaminated."
  • The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)
  • WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier — the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)
And these are just the incidents that we know about.

I think that it would be safe to say that wherever the UN is vaccinating people for tetanus all over the world there are probably sterilizing agents in those vaccines.
--
Editor
Lawfulpath.com
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by notmartha » Sat Nov 15, 2014 12:49 pm

There has never been a shortage of evildoers. Forced sterilization as part of a eugenics plan has been happening all around the world, including the U.S.

You can read about the plans and practices in other countries here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization

In 1927 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a forced sterilization “law” for the supposed good of society.
U.S. Supreme Court
BUCK v. BELL, 274 U.S. 200 (1927)
274 U.S. 200
BUCK
v.
BELL, Superintendent of State Colony Epileptics and Feeble Minded.
No. 292.

Argued April 22, 1927.
Decided May 2, 1927.
[274 U.S. 200, 201] Mr. I. P. Whitehead, of Lynchburg, Va., for plaintiff in error.
[274 U.S. 200, 203] Mr. A. E. Strode, of Lynchburg, Va., for defendant in error.
[274 U.S. 200, 205]

Mr. Justice HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia, affirming a judgment of the Circuit Court of Amherst County, by which the defendant in error, the superintendent of the State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded, was ordered to perform the operation of salpingectomy upon Carrie Buck, the plaintiff in error, for the purpose of making her sterile. 143 Va. 310, 130 S. E. 516. The case comes here upon the contention that the statute authorizing the judgment is void under the Fourteenth Amendment as denying to the plaintiff in error due process of law and the equal protection of the laws.

Carrie Buck is a feeble-minded white woman who was committed to the State Colony above mentioned in due form. She is the daughter of a feeble- minded mother in the same institution, and the mother of an illegitimate feeble-minded child. She was eighteen years old at the time of the trial of her case in the Circuit Court in the latter part of 1924. An Act of Virginia approved March 20, 1924 (Laws 1924, c. 394) recites that the health of the patient and the welfare of society may be promoted in certain cases by the sterilization of mental defectives, under careful safeguard, etc.; that the sterilization may be effected in males by vasectomy and in females by salpingectomy, without serious pain or substantial danger to life; that the Commonwealth is supporting in various institutions many defective persons who if now discharged would become [274 U.S. 200, 206] a menace but if incapable of procreating might be discharged with safety and become self-supporting with benefit to themselves and to society; and that experience has shown that heredity plays an important part in the transmission of insanity, imbecility, etc. The statute then enacts that whenever the superintendent of certain institutions including the abovenamed State Colony shall be of opinion that it is for the best interest of the patients and of society that an inmate under his care should be sexually sterilized, he may have the operation performed upon any patient afflicted with hereditary forms of insanity, imbecility, etc., on complying with the very careful provisions by which the act protects the patients from possible abuse.

The superintendent first presents a petition to the special board of directors of his hospital or colony, stating the facts and the grounds for his opinion, verified by affidavit. Notice of the petition and of the time and place of the hearing in the institution is to be served upon the inmate, and also upon his guardian, and if there is no guardian the superintendent is to apply to the Circuit Court of the County to appoint one. If the inmate is a minor notice also is to be given to his parents, if any, with a copy of the petition. The board is to see to it that the inmate may attend the hearings if desired by him or his guardian. The evidence is all to be reduced to writing, and after the board has made its order for or against the operation, the superintendent, or the inmate, or his guardian, may appeal to the Circuit Court of the County. The Circuit Court may consider the record of the board and the evidence before it and such other admissible evidence as may be offered, and may affirm, revise, or reverse the order of the board and enter such order as it deems just. Finally any party may apply to the Supreme Court of Appeals, which, if it grants the appeal, is to hear the case upon the record of the trial [274 U.S. 200, 207] in the Circuit Court and may enter such order as it thinks the Circuit Court should have entered. There can be no doubt that so far as procedure is concerned the rights of the patient are most carefully considered, and as every step in this case was taken in scrupulous compliance with the statute and after months of observation, there is no doubt that in that respect the plaintiff in error has had due process at law.

The attack is not upon the procedure but upon the substantive law. It seems to be contended that in no circumstances could such an order be justified. It certainly is contended that the order cannot be justified upon the existing grounds. The judgment finds the facts that have been recited and that Carrie Buck 'is the probable potential parent of socially inadequate offspring, likewise afflicted, that she may be sexually sterilized without detriment to her general health and that her welfare and that of society will be promoted by her sterilization,' and thereupon makes the order. In view of the general declarations of the Legislature and the specific findings of the Court obviously we cannot say as matter of law that the grounds do not exist, and if they exist they justify the result. We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange if it could not call upon those who already sap the strength of the State for these lesser sacrifices, often not felt to be such by those concerned, in order to prevent our being swamped with incompetence. It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind. The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian tubes. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 , 25 S. Ct. 358, 3 Ann. Cas. 765.Three generations of imbeciles are enough. [274 U.S. 200, 208] But, it is said, however it might be if this reasoning were applied generally, it fails when it is confined to the small number who are in the institutions named and is not applied to the multitudes outside. It is the usual last resort of constitutional arguments to point out shortcomings of this sort. But the answer is that the law does all that is needed when it does all that it can, indicates a policy, applies it to all within the lines, and seeks to bring within the lines all similarly situated so far and so fast as its means allow. Of course so far as the operations enable those who otherwise must be kept confined to be returned to the world, and thus open the asylum to others, the equality aimed at will be more nearly reached.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice BUTLER dissents.
Karl Brandt, (Hitler’s physician and the head of his eugenics program) actually used this case (Buck vs. Bell) in his defense at the Nuremberg trials. If the U.S. is cleansing the earth of poor genetics, it must be ok, right?

From a Race of Masters to a Master Race: 1948 To 1848, by A. E. Samaan page 772:
Capture.JPG
Capture.JPG (78.09 KiB) Viewed 15211 times
Ahh.. wouldn't want to sap the strength of State... the perfect storm of forced vaccination and forced sterilization. Here's the forced vaccination case cited in Buck vs Bell: http://laws.findlaw.com/us/197/11.html
This court has more than once recognized it as a fundamental principle that 'persons and property are subjected to all kinds of restraints and burdens in order to secure the general comfort, health, and prosperity of the state.
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by notmartha » Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:31 pm

WHO and UNICEF at it still...
This may or may not fall under the heading "Sterilization through Vaccination", but anytime an "organization" goes after something so vehemently, the people are worse off for it.

From HERE:
Over 500 Pakistani parents arrested for children's failure to get polio vaccine

Islamabad, Pakistan (CNN)Police have arrested more than 500 parents in and around the northwestern Pakistani city of Peshawar for not allowing their children to get the polio vaccine, an official said Tuesday.

Peshawar Deputy Commissioner Riaz Khan Mehsud told CNN that the 513 arrests took place Monday and Tuesday as part of a government campaign to administer polio vaccines in parts of Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.

Those arrested will be released on bail if they sign an affidavit stating that they will let their children get vaccinated, according to the deputy commissioner.

Pakistan's vaccination rate is inordinately low for a number of reasons, including attacks on medical workers, the displacement of people due to ongoing military operations and a lack of trust by some families.

Whatever the reason, the fact that a large number of children are not immunized is having an impact.

Such vaccines are credited with wiping out polio in most parts of the world. But Pakistan is an exception, according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative, a public-private partnership that includes the World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF). The South Asian nation leads all others in new polio cases in recent years, and has nine of this year's 10 reported cases.

In 2014, Pakistan had 327 cases. The next closest country was Nigeria, with 36 cases.

Authorities in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province hope to ensure that 2.7 million children there get vaccine drops. They've learned about more than 13,000 cases in which parents have not done so since a provincial campaign began two weeks ago, Mehsud said.

Dr. Bilal Ahmad, a UNICEF team leader based in Pakistan, called authorities' unprecedented move a last-ditch effort to clear polio from "cluster" zones where large numbers of families have refused to get their children vaccinated.

"First the workers (try to) convince them, then their supervisors, then senior members of the community," Ahmad said. "(This government action) is the final step in eradicating this issue."

Polio is a highly infectious viral disease that primarily affects young children, sometimes leading to paralysis and death. The virus is easily preventable through immunization, but there's no cure once it is contracted.

It went from being a health issue to a security issue after U.S. intelligence officials used a vaccination program to help in their hunt for Osama bin Laden in 2011. Under cover of the program, the CIA sought to collect DNA samples from relatives of the al Qaeda leader to verify his presence in a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan.

Those administering the vaccines have become targets, with the National Emergency Operations Center reporting that more than 70 medical workers have been killed in attacks since December 2012.

And in June 2012, Pakistani Taliban commander Hafiz Gul Bahadur announced that polio vaccines would be banned in another Pakistani province -- North Waziristan -- because of drone strikes there. Bahadur called the strikes "worse than polio."

CNN's Sophia Saifi reported from Islamabad, and CNN's Greg Botelho wrote this report from Atlanta.
User avatar
editor
Site Admin
Posts: 688
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:24 am
Contact:

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by editor » Fri Mar 06, 2015 9:15 am

I'm familiar with this story. Just to be clear: This is not about whether or not to vaccinate, it's about whether or not you have the right to refuse.

It's not that I think vaccines, in and of themselves, are necessarily bad. The problem is that the people who are producing and administering these vaccines cannot be trusted.

So we have cases where the WHO has been caught red-handed using vaccines to sterilize whole populations, and the CIA uses phony vaccine programs to collect DNA samples and do God-only-knows what else? Not to mention the dramatic rise in autism and cancer in America, which a high percentage of doctors have linked to vaccines.

And then the media seems to think it's strange that so many people don't trust vaccinations? There may be nothing wrong with the polio vaccine being offered to the Pakistanis. Or there might. It's easy to understand their suspicion.

Recently the CDC admitted that more than 75% of the people who take the flu shots get the flu. They conveniently leave out statistics on how many people who did not get the flu shot get the flu. I'm betting it's way less than 75%. In fact I know a LOT of homeschoolers and other people who don't get flu shots, and none of them got the flu. Likewise I know a lot of people who regularly get flu shots, and who always get the flu. I speak with these people from time to time, and try to get them to see the light, but they'd rather believe the likes of Jimmy Kimmel than me.

The recent flap over measles is ridiculous. We're all being told that if we don't vaccinate our children then others are put at risk. How can this be? If the vaccines are effective, then only the people who don't get them will be at risk, right? We're not supposed to notice that 100% of the people, that's all of them, who recently came down with measles, had also already received the vaccine.

This push to force people all over the world to vaccinate is a property issue. It comes down to who owns your body, and the bodies of your children. Is it you, or the State?

Put yourself in the shoes of these Pakistanis. If you believe the vaccine will injure or kill your child; make them sick or maybe sterilize them, thereby cutting you off from ever having grandchildren, will you send your children to slaughter, or refuse the vaccines? If you are jailed, and told you will only be released if you consent to vaccinate your children, will you relent? What would be the point?

The State does have the responsibility to protect the public from contagious disease (Lev. 13:5, 21, 46; Num. 5:2-3). They are authorized to do this through quarantine of the sick, by force if necessary. This is not at all the same thing as forcing a foreign substance into peoples' bodies, no matter how pure and unselfish the motive.

If you were to strap a eugenicist up to a lie detector, and ask him if a vaccine known to sterilize recipients was "good for the people" and ask should people take it, he would say yes, and the lie detector would show he is not lying. Not because what he says is really true, but because he believes in his heart that killing off 3/5ths of the world's human population is a good thing.

These are the people who erected the Georgia Guidestones https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones. People, in my opinion, like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Al Gore, and George Soros. But that's my opinion; decide for yourself whether you think these people really have your best interests at heart.

Decide quickly though. I can see the propaganda campaign ramping up, and if you don't stand up for your rights you won't have them.
--
Editor
Lawfulpath.com
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by notmartha » Sun Mar 08, 2015 1:39 pm

editor wrote:So we have cases where the WHO has been caught red-handed using vaccines to sterilize whole populations, and the CIA uses phony vaccine programs to collect DNA samples and do God-only-knows what else? Not to mention the dramatic rise in autism and cancer in America, which a high percentage of doctors have linked to vaccines.And then the media seems to think it's strange that so many people don't trust vaccinations? There may be nothing wrong with the polio vaccine being offered to the Pakistanis. Or there might. It's easy to understand their suspicion.
This is an older article, but pertains to sterilization agents being in polio vax too:
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/niger ... cine-drive
Nigerian State Maintains Skepticism over WHO Agenda on Polio Vaccine Drive

KANO, Nigeria, March 22, 2004 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The northern Nigerian state of Kano has opted out of the WHO oral polio immunization drive—officials there remain skeptical of the safety of the vaccine.

The World Health Organization maintains that its oral polio vaccine is safe, despite a report by Nigerian pharmaceutical scientist Dr. Haruna Kaita, who found evidence that contaminants in the vaccine he tested in labs in India would “have direct effects on the human reproductive system.” A BBC report today said that the refusal by the majority Muslim state is a result of the Islamic leadership’s claim that the vaccination program is a western plot to render Muslim women infertile.

Kano State Governor Mallam Ibrahim Shekarau told the BBC’s Hausa service program in Kaduna that “We have investigated and discovered that there is danger in the polio vaccines. We have therefore opted out of the national immunization exercise against polio, until we are convinced of its efficacy and safety because [a] series of laboratory tests have revealed that the vaccines contain some substances which are capable of causing infertility, especially in females,” he said, as reported in all Africa’s ThisDay on-line news source. State health officials have said they would join the campaign to vaccinate Nigeria’s youth when they have assurance of an uncontaminated vaccine, or when their own vaccines which they have ordered from Asia arrive. During a visit to Canada this month by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Canada announced another $13 million in funding earmarked for the UN’s Global Polio Eradication Initiative. The fund brings the total allocation for the GPEI from Canada to $123 million since 1999.

Read the March 11 LifeSiteNews.com coverage “UNICEF Nigerian Polio Vaccine Contaminated with Sterilizing Agents Scientist Finds” at: http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/mar/04031101.html See the LifeSiteNews.com Special Report that reveals substantial evidence that UNICEF has become a very willing partner in the population control anti-child and anti-family programs of the U.N.: http://www.lifesite.net/waronfamily/unicef/index.html
Also this article.
User avatar
notmartha
Posts: 737
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by notmartha » Mon Apr 25, 2016 4:25 am

Updates in regards to polio vaccine in Pakistan and globally.

New Polio Vaccine Rolled Out In Massive Synchronized Worldwide Switch

April 17, 2016·12:07 PM ET
Starting today, 155 countries and territories will start switching to a different polio vaccine.

The shift, which is expected to be completed by May 1, is the "largest and fastest globally coordinated rollout of a vaccine into routine immunization programs in history," according to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative.

"We're closer than ever to ending polio worldwide, which is why we are able to move forward with the largest and fastest globally synchronized switch ever," Michel Zaffran, Director of Polio Eradication at the World Health Organization, said in a press release.

According to The New York Times, it's the "first worldwide vaccine change ever attempted."

The progress towards complete eradicating polio shows in the numbers. Last year, 74 cases of wild poliovirus were reported, exclusively in Pakistan and Afghanistan, according to the initiative. In 2016, 10 cases have been reported so far — also in those two countries. By comparison, when the initiative started its work in 1988, "more than 350,000 children were paralyzed every year."

As health officials strategize about how to rid the world of the disease, which can cause paralysis, "one important step is to gradually withdraw the oral polio vaccine, starting with the type 2 component," Jackie Fournier-Caruana from the initiative explains.

The old oral vaccine (tOPV) protected against three strains of poliovirus, while the new oral vaccine (bOPV) protects against two of the strains. According to the initiative, the transition is possible "because type 2 wild polio has been eradicated."

It stresses the importance of closely synchronizing this transition globally: "if some countries continue to use tOPV it could increase the risk of the spread of type 2 poliovirus to those no longer using tOPV."

This "massive undertaking" will involve deploying thousands of monitors to make sure tOPV is no longer in use.

The New York Times details the disposal methods during the switch:
"Approved disposal methods include incineration, boiling, autoclaving, bleaching or burying in concrete-sealed containers. Each has drawbacks, like the possibility that glass vials will explode.

"Adding to the possibility of confusion, the old and new vials and boxes are almost identical. Warehouse managers are supposed to mark the old vaccine with an "X" and bag it for disposal."
Dr. Walter Orenstein, who is the associated director of the vaccine center at Emory University School of Medicine, tells the Times, "This is going to be hard. ...For a long time, we've driven people to think of vaccine as valuable. Now we're asking them to destroy it."

The initiative says there's a global stockpile of type 2 vaccines, ready to be used in the unlikely case of an outbreak. Type 2 was last detected in the wild in 1999, according to the initiative.

Another “New” Polio Vaccine

April 18, 20164:24 PM ET

This week the world is attempting a first — the largest, quickest rollout of a vaccine in history. The goal is to make the polio vaccine safer, but it comes with a big risk.


ROBERT SIEGEL, HOST:

This week, health workers all over the world are attempting a first, to pull off the largest and quickest rollout ever of a new vaccine. It’s for polio. The goal is to replace the existing vaccine with a safer one. And as NPR’s Michaeleen Doucleff reports, this extraordinary effort comes with a risk.

MICHAELEEN DOUCLEFF, BYLINE: The world uses nearly 2 billion doses of polio vaccine each year. They’re all stored in little vials at clinics and hospitals across the globe. Now every single vial has to be destroyed and switched out with a new one, and it all has to get done in two weeks.

WALTER ORENSTEIN: This is a tremendous amount of difficult logistics.

DOUCLEFF: That’s Walter Orenstein. He’s the associate director of the Emory Vaccine Center. He says countries have been training for this switch for months. Health workers have been taught to destroy the old vaccine by boiling it, incinerating it, even burying it in the ground.

ORENSTEIN: And what’s being done is to go out and have independent monitors visit these sites to make sure the vaccine has been collected and destroyed.

DOUCLEFF: Do you know how many sites there are, like just scale wise?

ORENSTEIN: That I don’t know, but it’s huge. It’s mind-boggling.

DOUCLEFF: Thousands of monitors are visiting thousands and thousands of sites. But Orenstein says it’s all being done for a really good reason, to get the world closer to eradicating polio. Robin Nandy is the chief of immunization at UNICEF, which is helping with the vaccine switch out. He says the vaccine used in most countries contains a live virus. Now, the virus has been weakened, so it doesn’t make people sick but…

ROBIN NANDY: In very rare instances, the live vaccine virus can mutate and cause polio.

DOUCLEFF: Last year, the world recorded about 100 cases of polio. About 30 of them were caused by mutant strains from the old vaccine. And that’s why it’s so important that all those vials of the old vaccine are completely destroyed. If some aren’t, some of that virus could leak out into the world, and we could have outbreaks of a type of polio we haven’t seen since 1999.

NANDY: We do expect this and we have put in place measures to detect this very quickly and respond to this.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1196
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by Firestarter » Sat Jan 21, 2017 11:01 am

Seven health care workers in Erie, Pennsylvania that refused the mandatory flu vaccination (prescribed by the CDC) for religious reasons were fired. They then won a $300,000 settlement for religious discrimination and were reinstated in their job.
Since then other health care workers, that refuse to be vaccinated, are made to wear a mask in front of their mouth and nose (instead of being fired).
Even students are forced to vaccination, because without it they cannot graduate.
I guess that health care workers can only use religious reasons to refuse this mandatory vaccination.

There is no shred of evidence that vaccinations are in fact good for the health of the population: http://vaccineimpact.com/2017/why-are-n ... -vaccines/
Image

I´ve also heard stories about children that are constantly harassed by the teachers in school for refusing vaccinations.
I haven´t found scientific evidence that vaccinations are indeed used to reduce the population, but my guess is that girls are sterilised by “vaccines”.
I did find some nasty stories about vaccinating the third world. See the following quote from another thread.
Firestarter wrote:Polio vaccination
Vaccination is a perfect way not only to murder children but test chemical and biological weapons.
In 1997 the WHO and UNICEF introduced the National Immunization Days in Uganda. After many children dying and Kihura Nkuba discussing it on his radio shows, revolts broke out in the streets. The army of Uganda was used to vaccinate children with polio. Nkuba reported he had a terrible car crash, when two pick-up trucks forced him off the road. See: http://www.whale.to/a/nkuba.htm
Member of Bilderberg Melinda Gates, wife of the not richest man in the world, is a real philanthropist and founded the “Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation”, who is trying to get “wild polio” out of this world. Apparently it is really bad when (only) several hundreds of children die of “wild polio”, so ten thousands of children in India get paralysed by Non-Polio Acute Flaccid Paralysis (NPAFP), caused by the vaccine. See: http://humansarefree.com/2016/05/bill-g ... aused.html
Bill Gates has clarified why he is so concerned that children do not get vaccinated: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent”.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1196
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by Firestarter » Sun Feb 19, 2017 3:19 pm

I have found a recent scientific study that shows that vaccination causes Anorexia Nervosa (AN), Compulsive Disorder (OCD), Anxiety Disorder, and Tic Disorder.
D.L. Leslie et al “Temporal Association of Certain Neuropsychiatric Disorders Following Vaccination of Children and Adolescents: A Pilot Case–Control Study” (2017): http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/ ... 00003/full

This study shows that vaccines have a higher Hazard Ratio, in 3 months, (see Table 2):
Anorexia Nervosa - 1.80 [especially high for Flu vaccines];
Compulsive Disorder - 1.23 [especially high for Flu and Hep. A vaccines];
Anxiety Disorder - 1.12 [especially high for Flu vaccines];
Tic Disorder - 1.11 [especially high for Flu an Meningitis vaccines];
ADHD - 1.06.
Image

These results are very troubling and significant. Varicella is smallpox by the way…
The state media found a really smart way to sweep these results under the carpet, by simply concluding:
However, our findings do not demonstrate a causal role of vaccination in the pathoetiology of any of these conditions. This is especially important given the clear public health benefits of the timely administration of vaccines in preventing mortality and morbidity (38). Vaccines are among the most successful and cost-effective preventive public health interventions (39).

There isn’t any scientific evidence that vaccinations are beneficial. There has never been a proper placebo controlled trial on the efficacy of vaccines. Instead the state media claim that it would be “unethical” to have a proper study on the effects of vaccines.
I will not show you an anti-vaxxer story (most of which are almost as one-sided as the pseudoscientific studies by the CDC and their ilk), but here’s a story of a vaccination-idiot with the ridiculous conclusion “How many times do you have to be tricked before you realize that you are being victimized by your lack of knowledge of science and statistics?”: http://www.skepticalob.com/2009/10/late ... ccine.html

This pro-vaccination moron gives THE argument against vaccination. We have been tricked into accepting medical treatment for which the beneficial effects have never been scientifically proven.

I will end this post with the humanitarian psychopath Bill Gates.
Firestarter wrote:Bill Gates has clarified why he is so concerned that children do not get vaccinated: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent”.
The following video at TED2010 begins with Bill Gates explaining about the horrors of increasing CO2 and that we need to reduce the rise of CO2 in the atmosphere to 0 and ends with the previous infamous quote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WUJMR3BUm2s
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1196
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by Firestarter » Tue May 16, 2017 3:38 pm

For some time I’ve been thinking that the main objective of vaccines is to reduce fertility, to reduce the population. This type of eugenics couldn’t be discovered (especially with the same elite that control big pharma, also controlling education and mainstream media).
And such a strategy would really cut both ways, because the happy couple that would be “helped” by the medical industry with artificial insemination techniques to give them a baby, would stand in awe of big pharma, which would be to blame for their misfortune in the first place…
I have found some more evidence that this is indeed happening.

The GAVI Alliance was founded in 2000 with the help of the Gates Foundation, other donors include: the Rockefeller foundation, UNICEF, World Health Organization (WHO), and World Bank.
GAVI has the goal of vaccinating the entire third World.
Obviously part of the plan is to reduce fertility for depopulation purposes.
The research by Jurriaan Maessen, is an important source for information on anti-fertility vaccines.
There are not only vaccines to reduce fertility, but pregnant women are forced to get vaccinated, which has caused abortions in Thailand and the Philippines: http://www.oldthinkernews.com/2010/09/0 ... reduction/


A 2010 study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) indicated that Philippine women were “unwittingly vaccinated against their own children”.
By linking hCG with tetanus antigens in a vaccine, researchers fool a woman’s immune system into producing antibodies against hCG, which makes her allergic to her own embryo.
Once her immune system is sufficiently stimulated against hCG, the pregnant woman will spontaneously abort the embryo: https://www.pop.org/bad-blood-in-the-philippines/


The following report shows that influenza vaccination causes abortions in lab animals; Ayoub & Yazbak “Influenza Vaccination During Pregnancy: A Critical Assessment of the Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)” (2006): http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ayoub.pdf
Image


The 1978 WHO task force “Evaluating the safety and efficacy of placental antigen vaccines for fertility regulation”, shows initiatives to use vaccines for reduced fertility.
It even shows that they already knew then that hCG can cause abortions.
Although substantial progress has been made over the last few years in the provision of family planning services to many of the World's populations, there is still an urgent need for a greater variety of safe, effective and acceptable methods of fertility regulation to meet widely differing personal, cultural and service requirements.
Immunization as a prophylactic measure is now so widely accepted that it has been suggested that one method of fertility regulation which might have wide appeal as well as great ease of service delivery would be an anti-fertility vaccine.
(…)
In principle, anti-fertility vaccines may: (a) prevent sperm transport and/or fertilization; (b) prevent or disrupt implantation; and (c) prevent blastocyst development.
(…)
Several potential complications have to be considered upon immunization of humans with immunogenic conjugates of HCG-derived antigens. Some of these hazards are related to potential disruption of the endocrinological balance and maternal-embryonal relationships; others are related to the possible autoimmunity induced with human-derived material as an autoantigen. Consideration of these potential hazards should provide guidelines for design and evaluation of animal and human studies.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articl ... 5-0170.pdf


The Gates Foundation is heavily involved in vaccinating the world.
In the following 29:32 video Bill Gates, in a presentation for the TED 2010 conference, explains that we need “solutions” that will make the “miracle” of zero CO2 emission happen. By 2050 we must realize an 80% reduction in CO2 emission...
Gates explains that “people” (P) are at the basis of this “problem” (4:00-4:55)
It includes the following notorious quote: “The world today has 6.8 billion people … that’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq2Zn7I
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1196
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Sterilization through Vaccination

Post by Firestarter » Mon Nov 13, 2017 4:56 pm

I’ve found an interesting story about the depopulation agenda in Mexico, which involves vaccines.
In 1973, the Mexican birth rate was unashamedly described as a “Population Bomb” in the state media.
Image

In 1974, a group of Mexicans found out (or at least suspected) that a group disguised as inoculation teams “who looked like foreigners” gave shots at schools to sterilise their children. The teams were escorted by the police.
Vaccination was never done at Mexican schools, so the parents had a good reason to be suspicious.

The “rumours” began in the north in Nuevo Leon, and then reached Mexico City, where thousands of angry parents “in slum areas” stormed and barricaded schools, and removed their children from them. Some 35-40% of elementary kids were absent Wednesday of that week.
According to the National Action party: “The rare vaccine, until now never used, much less as part of a campaign which appears to cover many parts of the republic, is given to each child in three places: the umbilicis, the chest, and the spinal column”.
The government denied the “rumours”, claiming that sterilisation vaccines don’t exist.
Image

Coercive sterilisations under the banner of “family planning” were taking place all over the globe in 1974. In April 1974, it was reported that the government had sterilised some 1,204 girls and boys under the age of 21 at federally funded clinics across the country. This included a ten year old, an eleven year old, and ten 13 year olds.
The US government had funded sterilisations on: poor women, the mentally ill, deaf, blind, with Epilepsy, and others who were considered “unfit” to have babies.

Jurriaan Maessen noted, that Rockefeller had already conceived sterilisation vaccines way back in the 1930s:
Rockefeller Foundation minion Max Mason, who acted as president in the mid-1930s, on multiple occasions expressed his master’s desire for an “anti-hormone” that would reduce fertility worldwide. Now keep in mind, this is more than 35 years before the Foundation actually mentioned funding “anti-fertility vaccines” in subsequent annual reports from 1969 onward.
http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/05/07/ ... s-in-1974/
(archived here: http://archive.is/zxQ34)


In 1972, the United Nations, World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank collaborated on the “Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP)” to “coordinate, promote, conduct, and evaluate research in human reproduction”.
In 1972, the WHO founded the “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” to produce an hCG-laced anti-fertility vaccine.
This has continued to produce vaccines for “fertility regulation”, see the following report from 1991: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1874951
(archived here: http://archive.is/HG8pN)

In 1973, Stevens and Chrystle published a report on anti-fertility vaccines, which showed that hCG can be used to sterilise women.
Here’s the abstract of “Effects of Immunization with Hapten-Coupled HCG on the Human Menstrual Cycle” (1973): http://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Ab ... _on.1.aspx

In 1976 another study on hCG was published by A. Pala et al “Immunization with hapten-coupled hCG-β subunit and its effect on the menstrual cycle” (1976), only the abstract: http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/art ... 0009-3/pdf


And then there’s the infamous 1974 National Security Council Document 20506: Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests. Written by none other than Nobel Prize winner for peace, Henry Kissinger...
They identified India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia as problematic: http://schillerinstitute.org/strategic/NSSM200.htm
29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two-child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000.
(…)
In less developed countries growth rates average about 2.4 percent. For the People's Republic of China, with a massive, enforced birth control program, the growth rate is estimated at under 2 percent. India's is variously estimated from 2.2 percent, Brazil at 2.8 percent, Mexico at 3.4 percent, and Latin America at about 2.9 percent. African countries, with high birth as well as high death rates, average 2.6 percent; this growth rate will increase as death rates go down.
(…)
Steady increases in the number of acceptors at family planning facilities indicate a likelihood of some fertility reduction in Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines, Colombia, and other countries which have family planning programs. On the other hand, there is little concrete evidence of significant fertility reduction in the populous countries of India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc.1
(...)
concentrating on the education and indoctrination of the rising generation of children regarding the desirability of smaller family size.
(…)
Considerable reduction in infant and child mortality is possible through improvement in nutrition, inoculations against diseases, and other public health measures if means can be devised for extending such services to neglected LDC populations on a low-cost basis. It often makes sense to combine such activities with family planning services in integrated delivery systems in order to maximize the use of scarce LDC financial and health manpowder (sic.) resources (See Section IV). In addition, providing selected health care for both mothers and their children can enhance the acceptability of family planning by showing concern for the whole condition of the mother and her children and not just for the single factor of fertility.
(…)
Research indicates that female wage employment outside the home is related to fertility reduction. Programs to increase the women's labor force participation must, however, take account of the overall demand for labor; this would be a particular problem in occupations where there is already widespread unemployment among males. But other occupations where women have a comparative advantage can be encouraged.
(…)
d. Sterilization of men and women has received wide-spread acceptance in several areas when a simple, quick, and safe procedure is readily available. Female sterilization has been improved by technical advances with laparoscopes, culdoscopes, and greatly simplifies abdominal surgical techniques. Further improvements by the use of tubal clips, trans-cervical approaches, and simpler techniques can be developed. For men several current techniques hold promise but require more refinement and evaluation. Approx. Increased Cost $6 million annually.
Post Reply