Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:27 pm
Ron Paul’s team asked Youtube to explain why his video on the COVID-19 hysteria was deleted...
Apparently Youtube doesn’t allow criticism of “the efficacy of the World Health Organization or local health authorities”!
Web.archive.org deleted the image (http://web.archive.org/web/202009271416 ... ight=142px)!
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/fe ... lieve-why/
According to German Minister Gerd Muller the global lockdown pandemic will result in “one of the biggest” hunger and poverty crises in history:
Other experts have warned of an additional 1.4 million tuberculosis deaths globally because of the lockdown.
Minister Muller also expects that the lockdown will cause a further wave of mass migration to Europe (all part of the UN mass migration plan): https://summit.news/2020/09/25/german-m ... d-19-does/
According to the New York Times, the test protocols for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are severely flawed, and could lead to approval of these vaccines with an efficacy of (only) 50% for “mild COVID-19” infection.
As there is no reason to be afraid of a “mild COVID-19” infection, these test trials are intentionally set up in a flawed way.
There are 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials in the US (under Operation Warp Speed) that will stop when 150 to 160 trial subjects will develop COVID-19. Two of these trials will review the data before the end of the trial (obviously we’re not talking about double-blind placebo-controlled trials).
This statistically makes the chances much higher that a vaccine can be approved (even without efficacy).
As the COVID-19 symptoms have been determined so broadly it is already known that several of these symptoms are also adverse vaccine reactions.
This would make it possible to label COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group as adverse vaccine reactions. Normally these reactions should of course be a reason to disapprove the vaccine but in our Brave New World, these could lower the number of COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group (to artificially inflate the vaccine efficacy and get the vaccine approved): https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09 ... sign-flaw/
Apparently Youtube doesn’t allow criticism of “the efficacy of the World Health Organization or local health authorities”!
Web.archive.org deleted the image (http://web.archive.org/web/202009271416 ... ight=142px)!
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/fe ... lieve-why/
According to German Minister Gerd Muller the global lockdown pandemic will result in “one of the biggest” hunger and poverty crises in history:
We expect an additional 400,000 deaths from malaria and HIV this year on the African continent alone, half a million more will die from tuberculosis.
Other experts have warned of an additional 1.4 million tuberculosis deaths globally because of the lockdown.
Minister Muller also expects that the lockdown will cause a further wave of mass migration to Europe (all part of the UN mass migration plan): https://summit.news/2020/09/25/german-m ... d-19-does/
According to the New York Times, the test protocols for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are severely flawed, and could lead to approval of these vaccines with an efficacy of (only) 50% for “mild COVID-19” infection.
As there is no reason to be afraid of a “mild COVID-19” infection, these test trials are intentionally set up in a flawed way.
There are 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials in the US (under Operation Warp Speed) that will stop when 150 to 160 trial subjects will develop COVID-19. Two of these trials will review the data before the end of the trial (obviously we’re not talking about double-blind placebo-controlled trials).
This statistically makes the chances much higher that a vaccine can be approved (even without efficacy).
As the COVID-19 symptoms have been determined so broadly it is already known that several of these symptoms are also adverse vaccine reactions.
This would make it possible to label COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group as adverse vaccine reactions. Normally these reactions should of course be a reason to disapprove the vaccine but in our Brave New World, these could lower the number of COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group (to artificially inflate the vaccine efficacy and get the vaccine approved): https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09 ... sign-flaw/