Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

General healthcare discussion, and Obamacare news.
Please note that specific help and support for Gregory Allan's book "How to Survive Hospital Costs Without Insurance" must be directed to the private Forum used for that purpose.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Sun Sep 27, 2020 3:27 pm

Ron Paul’s team asked Youtube to explain why his video on the COVID-19 hysteria was deleted...

Apparently Youtube doesn’t allow criticism of “the efficacy of the World Health Organization or local health authorities”!
Web.archive.org deleted the image (http://web.archive.org/web/202009271416 ... ight=142px)!
Image
http://ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/fe ... lieve-why/


According to German Minister Gerd Muller the global lockdown pandemic will result in “one of the biggest” hunger and poverty crises in history:
We expect an additional 400,000 deaths from malaria and HIV this year on the African continent alone, half a million more will die from tuberculosis.

Other experts have warned of an additional 1.4 million tuberculosis deaths globally because of the lockdown.

Minister Muller also expects that the lockdown will cause a further wave of mass migration to Europe (all part of the UN mass migration plan): https://summit.news/2020/09/25/german-m ... d-19-does/


According to the New York Times, the test protocols for the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are severely flawed, and could lead to approval of these vaccines with an efficacy of (only) 50% for “mild COVID-19” infection.
As there is no reason to be afraid of a “mild COVID-19” infection, these test trials are intentionally set up in a flawed way.

There are 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials in the US (under Operation Warp Speed) that will stop when 150 to 160 trial subjects will develop COVID-19. Two of these trials will review the data before the end of the trial (obviously we’re not talking about double-blind placebo-controlled trials).
This statistically makes the chances much higher that a vaccine can be approved (even without efficacy).

As the COVID-19 symptoms have been determined so broadly it is already known that several of these symptoms are also adverse vaccine reactions.
This would make it possible to label COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group as adverse vaccine reactions. Normally these reactions should of course be a reason to disapprove the vaccine but in our Brave New World, these could lower the number of COVID-19 cases in the vaccine group (to artificially inflate the vaccine efficacy and get the vaccine approved): https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/09 ... sign-flaw/
Last edited by Firestarter on Fri Oct 02, 2020 3:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Fri Oct 02, 2020 3:29 pm

An organisational chart of the $10 billion Operation Warp Speed, shows that the operation is led by mostly military personnel.
Roughly 60 military officials (including 4 generals) are leaders of Operation Warp Speed. Only 29 of the roughly 90 leaders aren’t employed by the Department of Defense (most of these work for the Department of Health and Human Services and its subagencies).
Image

The leadership team of Operation Warp Speed includes hardly any civilian scientists. The majority of the actual scientists working on Operation Warp Speed are from the same companies that develop the vaccines.
We wouldn’t want “independent” scientists to develop a vaccine, let’s leave our “health care” to the military and big pharma - right!

HHS’ deputy chief of staff for policy Paul Mango explained that there really is no “need” to conduct “any science”:
There’s really not a need for anyone to place scores of scientists inside HHS or DOD to get this done. Quite honestly, we are not conducting any science whatsoever inside the government to support Operation Warp Speed, none.
https://www.statnews.com/2020/09/28/ope ... volvement/


It looks like, with Trump the firm favourite to be re-elected president, the presidential campaign is already finished. Of course this doesn’t mean that we won’t get an “October surprise”.

With Joe Biden getting no publicity, it has been announced that both Donald and wife Melania have tested positive for the (far from lethal) coronavirus.
President Donald tweeted:
Tonight, @FLOTUS and I tested positive for COVID-19. We will begin our quarantine and recovery process immediately. We will get through this TOGETHER!

His better half tweeted:
As too many Americans have done this year, @potus & I are quarantining at home after testing positive for COVID-19. We are feeling good & I have postponed all upcoming engagements. Please be sure you are staying safe & we will all get through this together.

The scheduled second presidential debate for 15 October will probably be cancelled: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... e-One.html


This is from an April 2020 World Bank document. BEFORE the WHO declared the “pandemic” on 11 March 2020...
On March 3, 2020, the Board of Executive Directors endorsed the World Bank Group (WBG) to take urgent action supporting client countries’ response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated ... roject.pdf


Because of the worldwide corona lockdown, 1.6 billion workers in the informal economy (the most vulnerable of the workforce) are in danger of losing their income.
That is out of a worldwide total of 2 billion in the informal economy and a global workforce of 3.3 billion people.

An estimated loss of working hours in Q2 (compared to pre-crisis levels):
12.4% for the Americas;
11.8% for Europe and Central Asia;
Above 9.5% for other regions in the world.

In the first month of the crisis the income of informal workers globally dropped some 60%:
81% in Africa and the Americas;
70% in Europe and Central Asia;
21.6% in Asia and the Pacific.

Worldwide, more than 436 million businesses are in deep trouble.
232 million in wholesale and retail;
111 million in manufacturing;
51 million in accommodation and food services;
42 million in real estate and other business activities: https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-il ... /index.htm
(https://archive.is/2wgKr)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Fri Oct 09, 2020 4:05 pm

I’ve seen some stories by “conspiracy theorists” claiming that the COVID-19 virus has never been isolated. Unfortunately all of these stories were too complex and/or long.
Wouldn’t you know it? A document published on 13 July 2020 (4 months after the “pandemic” had already been started) the almighty Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Viral Diseases (CDC) explicitly confirms no “virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available”:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…
Image
You have to scroll down all the way to page 39, to the section “Performance Characteristics” if you think my image isn’t good enough.

As no COVID-19 virus has ever been isolated, all the coronavirus tests are complete and utter BS, because they don’t even know what they’re looking for.
You could compare this to a “positive” DNA-test or fingerprint, where no DNA or fingerprint was available, so instead they compared it to “something” generated by a computer simulation: https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/10 ... available/


Not only in the US, the army is involved in making sure we get poisoned with the experimental COVID-19 vaccines (as per definition, this won´t protect against this year´s new coronavirus strain).

British Secretary of State for Health and Social Care Matt Hancock said the UK government is “working as hard as we can” on a Covid-19 vaccine, and that the “armed services” will be “making the rollout happen”.
Hancock said the NHS contact-tracing app will also be used.

British MP Tobias Ellwood argued that the army should distribute the vaccine and hand out “vaccine certificates” as a prerequisite for international travel. He also recommended a “national database” tracking those not vaccinated.

Britain’s vaccine task force chair Kate Bingham said that people could refuse the vaccines; and:
There's going to be no vaccination of people under 18. It's an adult-only vaccine, for people over 50, focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable.
https://www.rt.com/uk/502538-matt-hanco ... y-vaccine/


Queen Elizabeth has thanked the liars of the News Media Association for the disinformation and censorship to brainwash the public into accepting the lockdown that has caused a “pandemic”.

In a letter to the News Media Association, Elizabeth wrote:
The Covid-19 pandemic has once again demonstrated what an important public service the established news media provides, both nationally and regionally.
The efforts of the news media to support communities throughout the United Kingdom during the pandemic have been invaluable – whether through fundraising, encouraging volunteering, or providing a lifeline for the elderly and vulnerable to the outside world.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/2020/ ... vid-crisis


I’m no fan of the Daily Mail.
But the following made me smile…
Image
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Sun Oct 11, 2020 3:42 pm

For some reason it hasn’t gotten much publicity that 60% of US government’s Operation Warp Speed funding (some $6 billion of the $10 billion budget) has been kept secret, by using the secretive defence contractor South Carolina–based Advanced Technology International (ATI) instead of awarding contracts directly to the vaccine manufacturers. This means amongst others that probably the contracts awarded under Operation Warp Speed won’t be made public.

This has apparently been done to “bypass the regulatory oversight and transparency of traditional federal contracting mechanisms”. Of course this could mean that part of 10 billion dollar bonanza goes to other activities than vaccines.
It’s hard to think of a reason for this extreme secrecy by using a secretive contractor like ATI nor for the excessive role of the military in this “public health” operation.

In February 2017, ATI was bought by Analytic Services Inc. (ANSER), which was originally founded in the late 1950s as a spin-off of the notorious RAND Corporation.
ANSER plays a major role in government operations, particularly for Homeland Security, since Ruth David became its CEO in 1998.

Before becoming CEO of ANSER, David was deputy director for science and technology at the CIA.
Ruth David in that role would be instrumental in founding the CIA’s venture capital arm In-Q-Tel, which is responsible for founding major technology corporations like Google and Palantir.

The architect of the controversial April update to the PREP Act, HHS ASPR Robert Kadlec, plays a large role in awarding Operation Warp Speed contracts.
Kadlec is of course also tied to Emergent BioSolutions that gets part of the billions (how much?): http://thelastamericanvagabond.com/oper ... ts-secret/
(https://archive.is/FbuWv)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:28 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Fri Oct 09, 2020 4:05 pm
A document published on 13 July 2020 (4 months after the “pandemic” had already been started) the almighty Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Viral Diseases (CDC) explicitly confirms no “virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available
It looks like the almighty CDC contradicts itself, because on 5 May 2020 it claimed:
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was isolated in the laboratory and is available for research by the scientific and medical community.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nc ... lture.html

Here’s the CDC’s article on isolating the virus. From June 2020 (that’s before admitting that COVID-19 had NOT been isolated).
One of many problem is that they claim to have used PCR to isolate the virus (which is impossible!):
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article


The following paper by David Crowe looks like it’s aimed at “professionals” – scientists and other quacks working in the medical field – but for most others it’s boring (and too long).
If you’re interested in:
No purified coronavirus was isolated and why this is important;
Why the PCR test shouldn’t be used like this.
This could be THE paper you want to read.

David Richard Crowe died on 12 July 2020 of “cancer”, aged 63 years.

As they haven’t been able to purify viral particles of COVID-19, every “positive” test is per definition - a false positive.

As there are no distinctive symptoms, a COVID-19 infection cannot be diagnosed in any other way either.

The COVID-19 test is based on PCR, which doesn’t produce a positive/negative result, but the number of cycles required to detect sufficient material to beat the arbitrary cut-off between positive and negative. Because of this the best the test could do is estimate the chance that the subject is infected, but I think it’s safe to say that the PCR test could only determine a non-infection (as it is excellent to find very small amounts).
There is no “scientific” certainty of what the cut-off number of cycles would be to produce a negative – some say as low as 30 others go as high as 45 cycles as the cut-off (to produce a negative test result – no infection).

Because the PCR test shouldn’t be used like this, repeatedly test result have gone from positive/negative/positive and back again in a couple of days.

David Crowe – Flaws in Coronavirus Pandemic Theory (Version 6 was first published on 12 March 2020; the latest is dated 6 June 2020, 5 weeks before his death): https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/202004041823 ... sPanic.pdf)


The following relatively long article has more information on the NOT isolation of the amazing COVID-19.
A virus should be isolated purified viruses, but all the 4 scientific papers that claimed to have “isolated” THE coronavirus, admitted that their pictures aren’t of purified, isolated viruses.

Co-author of “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” (March 2020), Malik Peiris, admitted:
The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus

Co-author of “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19” (February 2020), Myung-Guk Han, admitted:
We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells

Co-author of “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea” (24 February 2020), Wan Beom Park, admitted:
We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification

Co-author of “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China” (20 February 2020), Wenjie Tan, admitted:
[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones”: https://www.globalresearch.ca/national- ... es/5720271
(https://archive.is/egYbP)


Isolation camps in British colony Canada are not limited to isolating COVID-19 infected or international travellers.
https://youtu.be/AzWLlfwfD4Y
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Wed Oct 14, 2020 3:37 pm

The following video, of only 13:28 minutes, is very informative – about the biggest company you’ve never heard of: SERCO.
https://youtu.be/5kaWxe-ijVg


The UK government awarded SERCO a £108 million COVID-19 contact tracing contract that will rise to £432 million if it continues until 2021.
The UK government has awarded SERCO another £45 million to run COVID-19 test centres (who cares about our privacy anyway?).

SERCO’s subsidiary Geografix had engaged in fraud and false accounting in a notorious prisoner electronic tagging scheme, which was settled for £100 million: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opende ... ce-scheme/
(https://archive.is/mK1lB)


In 2019, the infamous Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Trust increased its stake in Serco Group Plc, with nearly 200,000 shares to 3.74 million shares worth about 5.3 million pounds ($6.6 million, only a fraction of Gates foundation’s total assets of $48 billion): https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-wor ... ison-firm/


SERCO’s sister organisations include Qinetiq and the Pirbright Institute.


Brother of SERCO CEO Rupert Soames, “Sir” Nicholas Soames, is best friends with Prince Charles.
Nicholas Soames, Defence Minister at the time and now Chairman of arms company Aegis, threatened Diana 7 months before her death and warned her to stop meddling with landmines.
Diana’s friend Simone Simmons listened in on the phone call with Nicholas Soames:
This person was saying to her that she shouldn't interfere in matters she knows nothing about.
He then said, 'well, accidents can happen.'
At the end of the call Diana was pale and upset. She couldn't understand why she was doing something good and was being criticised and being threatened.
She was very distressed.
viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1076


For more on SERCO: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=748&start=20#p59198

---------------------------------
Just like in the US, the UK uses a secretive group to keep all the things we should know about the response to the coronavirus “pandemic” hidden.
In May 2020, the Joint Biosecurity Centre (JBC) was especially founded in the UK to keep the government response to COVID-19 a secret.

It isn’t clear what the responsibilities of the JBC exactly are, or who controls it (I guess Queen Elizabeth) but it supposedly does “the surveillance of Covid-19 at a local level and consolidate the advice given to ministers”, and “advises on which countries should be added to or taken off the UK's quarantine list”.
Recommendations are reviewed and agreed upon by the 4 chief medical officers in the UK “nations “.

According to Professor John Drury:
The JBC has been around for months now, but the public seem to know very little about them. Transparency is a key principle of scientific research, and it should be applied to the JBC. When you are seen to be open about the advice you are giving, people are more likely to listen and take action.
https://archive.is/TFum5


Image
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Sat Oct 17, 2020 3:38 pm

A study compared 154 “case-patients” (that tested positive for COVID-19), to a control group of 160 participants (who tested negative); 71% of the case-patients had been infected despite “always” wearing a mask. Another more than 14% of the case-patients “often” wore a face covering.
This confirms that a face mask doesn’t protect us from the magic coronavirus: https://thefederalist.com/2020/10/12/cd ... ore-masks/


Bruce Jette, assistant secretary of the Army for acquisition, logistics and technology, has confirmed that the US Army will maintain social distancing measures put in place regardless of whether the coronavirus pandemic ends:
I would say we don’t back off of the COVID-19 standards because it will also reduce the impact of flu and other illnesses. We think continuing to apply these same techniques would be further beneficial to the people and to the Army overall.
https://www.defensenews.com/digital-sho ... emic-ends/


The following interview with investigative journalist Harry Vox was originally aired on 21 October 2014.
Vox predicted a planned global plandemic and explained why the “ruling class” would stage such a false flag:
They will stop at nothing to complete their toolkit of control. One of the things that had been missing from their toolkit is quarantines and curfews. The plan is to get hundreds of thousands of people infected with it and create the next phase of control.

I don’t agree with Vox that they will really infect the population though.
Vox bases much of what he says on the 2010 Rockefeller Lock Step plan (that I’ve posted about in this thread).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wuOxG-rnj30
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Tue Oct 20, 2020 4:07 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Sun Jun 14, 2020 3:39 pm
Months before the corona “pandemic” was started, the biggest investment fund in the world, BlackRock where the Trump family invests their savings, authored a plan to go “direct” in the next crisis, blurring the lines between government fiscal policy and central bank monetary policy.
The plan was rolled out in August 2019 at the G7 summit of central bankers.
As the result of implementation of BlackRock’s August 2019 “going direct” bailout plan, BlackRock’s assets under management have increased with 12% in only a year to a whopping $7.8 trillion.

BlackRock‘s shares rose another 3% after this news was published. BlackRock's stock has surged more than 25% in 2020 thanks to the coronavirus bailout plan: https://edition.cnn.com/2020/10/13/inve ... index.html


It is expected that BlackRock and Vanguard will even further increase their ownership of all the major corporations.
It is estimated by Bloomberg that by 2028 BlackRock and Vanguard together will control $20 trillion in assets.

Vanguard will increase its $4.7 trillion of assets to more than $10 trillion by 2023.
BlackRock could reach $10 trillion by 2025 (according to Bloomberg from “only” $6 trillion today).
Image

Vanguard founder Jack Bogle boasted in November 2019 at the Council on Foreign Relations about BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Corp:
That’s about 20 per cent owned by this oligopoly of three. It is too bad that there aren’t more people in the index-fund business.
Image

Global ETF assets could surge to $25 trillion by 2025 according to Jim Ross, chairman of State Street’s global ETF business: https://financialpost.com/investing/a-2 ... ngs-future
(https://archive.is/z1h9D)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Thu Oct 22, 2020 3:57 pm

Firestarter wrote:
Mon Oct 12, 2020 3:28 pm
Here’s the CDC’s article on isolating the virus. From June 2020 (that’s before admitting that COVID-19 had NOT been isolated).
One of many problem is that they claim to have used PCR to isolate the virus (which is impossible!):
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/6/20-0516_article
Dr. Tom Cowan has this to say on the CDC’s claim that the magical COVID-19 was isolated using PCR.
To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn's hair, hooves and horn.
The researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2 by "consensus," sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs will come up with different versions of the imaginary "unicorn," so they come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary unicorn.


Cowan claims that the following is even more of a “blockbuster”. While obviously he’s right, I disagree that this is even more important. Not having the virus isolated in the first places, makes all of the following “research” useless as they don’t know what they’re looking for…

Here’s the quote from the CDC’s scientific-looking paper…
Therefore, we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in several common primate and human cell lines, including human adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81 cells...
Each cell line was inoculated at high multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero cells, which grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and A549 cells were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection.

Cowan in short explains from the previous quote that the CDC here has proven that the (not) isolated COVID-19 doesn’t infect human cells in a test tube (so doesn’t infect humans!)…
What does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt to prove infection, they have three possible "hosts" or models on which they can test. The first is humans. Exposure to humans is generally not done for ethical reasons and has never been done with SARS-CoV-2 or any coronavirus. The second possible host is animals. Forgetting for a moment that they never actually use purified virus when exposing animals, they do use solutions that they claim contain the virus. Exposure to animals has been done once with SARS-CoV-2, in an experiment that used mice. The researchers found that none of the wild (normal) mice got sick. In a group of genetically modified mice, a statistically insignificant number lost some fur. They experienced nothing like the illness called Covid 19.

The shocking thing about the above quote is that using their own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 — even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means they proved, on their terms, that this "new coronavirus" is not infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells, and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.
”: https://www.sott.net/article/443103-Onl ... oV-2-virus
(https://archive.is/QpyhS)



The following article reaches the conclusion - based on public statements by the CDC - that the infection fatality rate of COVID-19 is roughly 0.14%: https://off-guardian.org/2020/10/08/who ... -than-flu/

They forgot to take into account that according to the CDC, only 6% of all coronavirus deaths (in the US) were related to the coronavirus alone; on average there were 2.6 additional (possible) causes per death.
This means that a better estimate of the COVID-19 fatality rate, would be to multiply 0.14% with 0.06, leading to a fatality rate of 0.008%...



Is anybody scared yet of this COVID-19 “pandemic” continuing for years if the population doesn’t stop it, by protesting against this clear violation of our constitutional rights?!?

Head of Operation Warp Speed, big pharma crony Moncef Slaoui, has confirmed that all Americans who (not) receive the COVID-19 vaccine will be monitored via “tracking systems” to “ensure that patients each get two doses of the same vaccine and to monitor them for adverse health effects”.
Maybe somebody should point out that these health effects should be monitored BEFORE everybody gets poisoned with the vaccines in an independent scientific trial…

Official OWS show that the vaccine human guinea pigs will be monitored for 24 months after the first dose of a COVID-19 vaccine through a “pharmacovigilance system” (what?!?).
OWS describes one of its “four key tenets” as “traceability” to: 1) “confirm which of the approved vaccines were administered regardless of location (private/public)”; 2) to send a “reminder to return for second dose”; and 3) to “administer the correct second dose”.

Despite claims that the “pharmacovigilance surveillance system” would intimately involve the FDA. In September, top FDA officials complained they were barred from attending OWS meetings and could not explain the operation’s organisation.

None other than tech giants Google and Oracle have been awarded the contract for this “tracking system” but it isn’t clear what their roles are besides helping to “collect and track vaccine data”…
In what looks like another “conflict of interest” Google’s owned YouTube recently banned all “misinformation” of concerns about the COVID-19 vaccine.

In the aftermath of 9/11, the US military attempted to institute the Total Information Awareness (TIA) surveillance program, managed by the Pentagon’s DARPA, so invasive that it was officially stopped months after its creation due to public outrage.
TIA’s apparent successor, Operation Warp Speed, is blatantly supported by all mainstream media and human rights organisations, so no public outrage could threaten this: https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com ... two-years/
(https://archive.is/HwRgJ)
User avatar
Firestarter
Posts: 1559
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter » Sun Oct 25, 2020 4:31 pm

Because of the complete lockdown of the economy, people in the third world are getting hungry.

Even in the “developed” US, some 1.5 million New Yorkers cannot buy food, and are standing in long lines to beg for food from food banks.
Because Big Brother wants to know everything, and the long lines were bad publicity (so short before the re-election of Donald Trump), people begging for food have to make an appointment before they can pick up food at Masbia: https://www.fox5ny.com/news/pandemic-wo ... ood-crisis


Billionaires all across the globe have gotten richer (source FT).
Image


Because more people work from home – office space prices have dropped in the US. Commercial real estate firm CBRE, said only about 12% of office workers in Manhattan had returned back to work…

The same 4 technology giants that told their employees to work from home - Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google – have been scooping up “cheap” office space in Manhattan.
These 4 companies have also hired 2,600 employees in NYC, bringing their total to 22,000. Because of the lockdown even more people use their products: https://archive.is/Uhlfa


On 20 September it was reported that (in the UK):
Tourism, hospitality businesses and close contact services such as hairdressers are required to collect NHS Test and Trace data, keeping the details on record for 21 days
https://www.newsandstar.co.uk/news/1873 ... usinesses/


Since the coronavirus “pandemic” was started in March, flu cases have almost vanished (confirmed by the World Health Organisation).
The mainstream media seem to suggest that the COVID-19 lockdown, social distancing and face masks have caused this reduction.

According to some “conspiracy theorists”, “flu cases haven't vanished at all, but are instead being recorded as Covid-19”: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... d-flu.html


I’m stunned; I actually agree in part with the analysis of why the COVID-19 hysteria has caused a drop in deaths by heart attack (by half)!
Although there is anecdotal evidence supporting this explanation, this avoidance of help for cardiac events presumably should be coupled with an increase in fatalities as people die at home rather than receive life-sustaining care in a hospital. It will take time to know whether reported increases in at-home deaths are tied to untreated heart attacks, but patients experiencing symptoms of a cardiac event certainly should be encouraged to seek help by calling 911 or going to an ER, as the risk of mortality from an unattended cardiac event is likely far higher than the risk of getting COVID-19 and potentially dying from that infection.

Another possibility is that a number of CVD cases are "misclassified" as cases of COVID-19 upon hospital admission, meaning cardiac events may still be occurring but are counted as COVID-19 because of a comorbid coronavirus infection. Heightened sensitivity by clinicians to COVID pathology may affect the diagnosis and management of conventional cardiac cases. However, the magnitude of the drop in cardiac event hospitalizations and the typical lengthy hospital stay for COVID-19 patients suggest that we are not dealing exclusively with a misclassification of cardiac events.

Finally, a drop in hospital admissions for cardiac events might be a consequence of stay-at-home orders and social isolation. It is very possible that we have seen a sudden decline in triggers for cardiac events during COVD-19 isolation, such as exertion from recreational activity, heavy air pollution, anger from being stuck in traffic, stress from watching a sporting event or perhaps acute work stress. It is these cardiac triggers that are likely important in the current context, given that underlying cardiovascular disease is likely not affected over the short term. Importantly, avoidance of some of these triggers – through social isolation for example – can also in the long run increase the risk of CVD.
http://usnews.com/news/healthiest-commu ... g-covid-19


One of the most important new causes of death in this “pandemic”… “not-urgent” medical treatments have been postponed (which means cancelled in the case of death)…
This has kept hospitals empty (bailed out with newly printed money) and some of these treatments would have prevented deaths.

At least 25,000 more people have died at home during the pandemic in England and Wales because they were refused hospital treatment, a surge of 43.8%.

I have my “doubts” about cancer treatment, but here are some examples (from the UK).
Treatment for strokes fell by 45%, causing over 2,000 excess deaths from heart disease;
Organ transplants fell by 67%, with the number of those dying on the transplant waiting list almost doubling;
Delays in cancer treatment could cause a 20% rise in cancer deaths in England – 6,270 excess deaths in 2020;
More than 50,000 operations for children were cancelled.

Besides that calls to child abuse helplines skyrocketed.
Rates of depression and anxiety doubled and thousands of recovering alcoholics have relapsed: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -bare.html
Post Reply