Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

General healthcare discussion, and Obamacare news.
Please note that specific help and support for Gregory Allan's book "How to Survive Hospital Costs Without Insurance" must be directed to the private Forum used for that purpose.
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter »

Starting today – 1 December – masks are mandatory in the Netherlands almost everywhere inside public places… so now I’m sitting in an internet cafe with a MASK on (nose uncovered though).
A large percentage of the customers in here don’t wear a mask…

Earlier today I went to the supermarket, not wearing a mask. To the complaints of the cashier that I must wear a mask, I replied.
Face masks are bad for your health, a policy implementing this, is called genocide.
I saw several employees taking off their mask (which they have every right to).
The whole policy is BS anyway, while I can’t go to the bars or restaurants, the schools, casinos and even the prostitutes remain open for business.

With the CARES Act, Congress allowed $454 billion of “stimulus money” to be distributed by the Treasury to the Federal Reserve to “save businesses and jobs” from the destructive lockdown. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin (of Skull & Bones) decides which programs are financed with this money.
Most of the $454 billion - $340 billion - that Mnuchin would funnel to the Fed is unaccounted for.

Bloomberg refused to expose this scandal but instead reported:
The money in question includes $429 billion that Mnuchin is clawing back from the Fed — which backed some of the central bank’s emergency lending facilities…
This doesn’t add up, as the Federal Reserve week by week admitted to have received “only” $114 billion from Treasury, leaving $340 billion unaccounted for (or $315 billion?).

Mnuchin funneled tens (or hundreds) of billions of dollars of CARES Act money to a slush fund, called the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), which states that it gives the U.S. Treasury Secretary “considerable discretion in the use of ESF resources”.
At the end of 2019, the ESF had assets of $93.3 billion, while by 30 September 2020 that amount had grown to $682 billion, so grown even more than the $340 billion unaccounted CARES Act money: https://wallstreetonparade.com/2020/11/11440/

It’s amazing how the deeply corrupt UK has such a “good” name in the world…
In February 2020, so shortly before the COVID-19 “pandemic” was started, Queen Elizabeth selected Rishi Sunak for Chancellor of the Exchequer.
Sunak is another Goldman Sachs alumnus.

Before Sunak entered politrics in 2013, he founded the hedge fund Theleme, which is registered in the money laundering, tax evasion paradise of the Cayman Islands.
Theleme owns a $500 million (£377 million) stake in the US-based Moderna; around 20% of all the money it manages ($2.5 billion). Moderna’s shares have skyrocketed because of the DNA-altering COVID-19 vaccines, engineered by Moderna.

Sunak as a partner in a hedge fund would own a stake and have money invested in its fund. Sunak refused to declare if he profits from the ballooning Moderna stock prices. Instead he placed his investments in a “blind trust”.
According to British politician Ed Davey:
The truth with this trust is that the only people that are blind to it are the public. The chancellor only set up the trust 18 months ago but the public has no idea where the money is or whether there is a conflict of interest. With public trust in this government plummeting, greater transparency in all their dealings is essential and the chancellor must show a lead.
In a nice example of cronyism, Sunak awarded Theleme a nice project, to build a financial model for the UK government’s business loans programme.

Rishi’s sister Raakhi is the COVID-19 United Nations engagement and strategy lead at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office.

Rishi Sunak’s real conflict of interest is the billionaire family of his wife Akshata Murty. Sunak “forgot” to declare his wife’s and her family's financial interests, which aren’t in a “blind trust”. The Murtys own a £1.7 billion stake in Infosys alone, that they cofounded in 1981, of which Akshata owns £430 million.
Akshata Murty uses a shell company in another tax evasion, money laundering paradise Mauritius: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/20 ... id-vaccine

Akshata’s daddy, Narayana Murthy, is on the on the board of directors of money laundering giant HSBC and was a director of DBS Bank, Unilever, ICICI and NDTV.
Narayana is also on the advisory boards of Cornell University, INSEAD, ESSEC, Ford Foundation, the UN Foundation, the Indo-British Partnership, Asian Institute of Management, and a trustee of the Rhodes Trust.
In 2005, Narayana Murthy co-chaired the World Economic Forum in Davos: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/N._R._Narayana_Murthy

Narayana’s wife, Sudha Murty, is chairwoman of Infosys.

Sudha started her career at the TATA Engineering and Locomotive Company (TELCO). The Tata family is one of the richest, powerful of India, who got rich by dealing opium.
Sudha also is a member of the public health care initiatives of the Gates Foundation: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudha_Murty

INFOSYS aims to vaccinate the whole world for which technology is key (I’m afraid this is no joke!).
Aadhar is the Indian digital ID card mandated for all Indians to access government services, based on iris recognition and fingerprints. Vaccination status will be added: https://www.infosys.com/newsroom/featur ... lanet.html
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Site Admin
Posts: 696
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:24 am

New Study Exposes Alleged Accounting Error Regarding COVID Deaths

Post by editor »

The following article appeared on zerohedge.com on 11/27/2020

Link to article: https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/new-s ... vid-deaths
New Study Exposes Alleged Accounting Error Regarding COVID Deaths
Fri, 11/27/2020 - 18:00

Authored by Ethan Yang via The American Institute for Economic Research,

At the time of this writing, the United States currently maintains the highest number of Covid-19 deaths and ranks 11th for the highest deaths per capita. There have been approximately 262,000 recorded Covid-19 deaths in the United States, which is certainly a concerning number.

However, a new study (link removed but now available at Archive.org) published by Dr. Genevieve Briand at Johns Hopkins University notes some critical accounting errors done at the national level.
2020-11-27_6-25-43_002.jpg (122.16 KiB) Viewed 2292 times
The study – which is still being vetted – simply examines the raw data that should have been questioned months ago.

The overall conclusion is that Covid-19, at least according to collected data, is not the killer disease that it is currently hyped up to be. AIER is not endorsing the study as is without further study, but we are interested in the argument being examined and discussed.

Viewing Covid-19 Deaths in Context

It is already well established that Covid-19 is a disease that is most dangerous to those over the age of 65 and who have preexisting conditions. In the United States, there has been an observed 2.1% mortality rate, with elderly individuals making up over half that number.

Young and healthy people are not by any significant capacity threatened by Covid-19.

One of the most important factors when it comes to Covid-19 is preventing excess death. According to the CDC,
“Estimates of excess deaths can provide information about the burden of mortality potentially related to the COVID-19 pandemic, including deaths that are directly or indirectly attributed to COVID-19. Excess deaths are typically defined as the difference between the observed numbers of deaths in specific time periods and expected numbers of deaths in the same time periods.”
Essentially, there is an average number of deaths every year due to a variety of causes that for the most part have remained constant through the years. This includes morbidities such as heart disease, which has long been the leading cause of death, and cancer, which has long plagued our existence. For Covid-19 to be a serious cause of alarm, it would need to significantly increase the number of average deaths.

However, according to the study,
“These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.”
Total deaths in the United States show no significant change and even mirror past trends of seasonal illness.
2020-11-27_6-27-49_002.jpg (53.7 KiB) Viewed 2292 times
Source: CDC Data, Methodology Included in this Video

According to this graph constructed using data provided by the CDC from the last 6 years, total deaths have remained relatively constant and increases can be explained by various factors such as a larger population. The spikes in deaths in 2020 are consistent with historical trends, only topping 2018 by 11,292 deaths. There have been over 262,000 deaths attributed to Covid-19 in the United States, yet total deaths have not increased in any alarming capacity; they have only mirrored existing trends. In short, according to 6 years of data collected by the CDC, Covid-19 has not led to any significant increase in deaths.

Diving Deeper

What is even more interesting if not more alarming is that the spike in recorded Covid-19 deaths seen in 2020 has coincided with a proportional decrease in death from other diseases.

Yanni Gu writes
“This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.”
Deaths have remained relatively constant, yet reported deaths due to deadly conditions such as heart disease have fallen while reported Covid deaths have risen. This suggests that the current Covid death count is in some capacity relabeled deaths due to other ailments. According to the graph, reported Covid deaths even overtook heart disease as the main cause of death at one point, which should raise suspicion.

This aligns with many other well-established facts about the virus, such as those with comorbidities are the most at risk. According to the CDC, about 94% of Covid deaths occur with comorbidities. This suggests that it could be possible that a large number of deaths could have been mainly due to more serious ailments such as heart disease but categorized as a Covid-19 death, a far less lethal disease.
2020-11-27_6-29-23_002.jpg (72.51 KiB) Viewed 2292 times
Source: John Hopkins News-Letter, provided by Genevieve Briand

According to this graph provided by the study, deaths labeled under Covid-19 increased while deaths labeled under others decreased. It is important to note that this sample only applies to the month of April as the author notes these were the weeks with the highest reported deaths. Gu writes
“The CDC classified all deaths that are related to COVID-19 simply as COVID-19 deaths. Even patients dying from other underlying diseases but are infected with COVID-19 count as COVID-19 deaths. This is likely the main explanation as to why COVID-19 deaths drastically increased while deaths by all other diseases experienced a significant decrease...

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.”
Furthermore, Briand’s research notes that the percentage of death has remained relatively constant through all age groups. Covid death statistics seem to mirror the normal distribution of death amongst age groups, further lending credence to the argument that many Covid deaths are recategorized deaths.
Screen-Shot-2020-11-26-at-12.png (254.91 KiB) Viewed 2292 times
Briand provides this graph constructed from CDC data that shows that deaths amongst various age groups have remained relatively constant.

By simply looking at the raw data presented by the CDC Gu writes that
“All of this points to no evidence that COVID-19 created any excess deaths. Total death numbers are not above normal death numbers. We found no evidence to the contrary,” Briand concluded.
What Do We Do With This Information?

Briand and likely many others suppose that the extreme emphasis on Covid-19 has led to the unintended classification of the disease as the cause of death. She further stresses that although this data challenges the idea that Covid is an unprecedented and lethal disease, we should still be concerned with mitigating death in general.

However, it is clear that this significant accounting error regarding Covid deaths, if true, is not productive. It has caused mass hysteria and misinformed public policy. Closing down communities to fight a virus that according to the data, has had no significant contribution to total deaths, reduces our overall capacity to build a healthy society.

[ZH: Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) noted on Twitter: "Folks: I know a lot of you are referencing this Johns Hopkins paper that’s been pulled. Unfortunately it is wrong. The excess deaths are real. Yes, they’re very, very skewed by age, but they’re real. Pretending otherwise doesn’t help."]

Lockdowns have resulted in severe damage to our capacity to improve the general health of society. From the catastrophic economic damage that lowers the standard of living for everyone to surgeries being deemed “unessential,” our current policies are not helping in preventing deaths in general; they are likely leading to more. Suicides and substance abuse are up, mental and physical health are down, all due to lockdowns.

The late Dr. Donald Henderson, who led the eradication of smallpox, noted in 2006 that
“Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.”
The hysteria over Covid-19 has likely led to the alleged accounting error noted in Briand’s study, the reclassification of expected deaths from all causes into Covid deaths.

That accounting error has likely led to a number of policy decisions that have drastically crippled our ability to support the general welfare of society, economically, socially, and spiritually. Going forward these findings should give us pause and reconsideration over the threat Covid-19 actually poses and realize how much avoidable damage we have done to ourselves as a result.
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

From the start of this pandemic, I’ve thought that the main purpose of the corona vaccines is to make women infertile in the latest depopulation scheme.
If these experimental mRNA-vaccines indeed permanently alter the DNA, this infertility would also be for life.

The short story is that the COVID-19 vaccine learns the immune system to fight against spike proteins, including syncytin-1, which is essential for the formation of the human placenta.
An immune response against the spike protein, could also attack synctin-1, which would cause infertility in women: https://2020news.de/en/dr-wodarg-and-dr ... -petition/

From the petition of German doctor Wolfgang Wodarg and British doctor Michael Yeadon.
XI. Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” - http://virological.org/t/response-to-nc ... iruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.
There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).
This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed.
https://healthimpactnews.com/wp-content ... hibits.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/202012051511 ... hibits.pdf)

The UK has already approved the genocidal Pfizer coronavirus vaccine, with the first victims to be poisoned as early as next week. The official documents confirm that the vaccines haven’t been properly tested.
Because side effects of the vaccine on pregnant women aren’t known, the vaccine shouldn’t be given to pregnant women.
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy.
For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.
http://web.archive.org/web/202012050000 ... accine.pdf

For more on infertility vaccines: viewtopic.php?f=21&t=278
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter »

Firestarter wrote: Tue Dec 01, 2020 4:56 pmRishi Sunak’s real conflict of interest is the billionaire family of his wife Akshata Murty. Sunak “forgot” to declare his wife’s and her family's financial interests, which aren’t in a “blind trust”. The Murtys own a £1.7 billion stake in Infosys alone, that they cofounded in 1981, of which Akshata owns £430 million.
Akshata Murty uses a shell company in another tax evasion, money laundering paradise Mauritius
Since March 23 2020, until the beginning of December, Infosys’ share price has more than doubled: https://archive.is/PDkAz

Here are the major shareholders in Infosys, most if not all are (family of) the founders of the company; including several members of the Murthy (or Murty) family: https://archive.is/U7Bfi

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has an advisory board to continue the lockdown that is dominated by billionaires and 116 corporate executives (that are or are owned by the same billionaires that own politicians).

The 40 CEOs include:
Albert Bourla of Pfizer;
Ajay Banga of MasterCard;
Danny Meyer of Union Square Hospitality Group;
Kewsong Lee of Carlyle Group.

Jonathan Gray is president and COO of the Blackstone Group.
Bill Mulrow was a Secretary to Gov. Cuomo and is now senior advisor at Blackstone and on the advisory board.
Another interesting name that advises Cuomo to keep the New York population in lockdown, is none other than Henry Cisneros, of Siebert, Brandford, Shank & Co and the notorious Cisneros clan.

Zephyr Teachout responded:
Cuomo is trying to take out the troubling democracy play-acting and go straight to rule by billionaires. Monday Gates. Tuesday Schmidt. Next up, Bezos to re-imagine the future of the economy, and Zuckerberg to re-imagine news. Friday maybe Blackrock just runs everything.
https://fortune.com/2020/05/12/governor ... -new-york/

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is amongst those who broke his own lockdown rules.
Other governors that broke the lockdown rules that “we” are imprisoned by.

Gavin Newsom (California Gov.);
Ralph Northam (Virginia Gov.): https://dailycaller.com/2020/11/24/news ... ronavirus/

The strike of over 200 million Indians on 26 November, was the “largest stroke in world history”.
They protested against the poverty and unemployment caused by the corona lockdown.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/india-lar ... ia/5731395

This month the World Health Organization (WHO) confirmed that there is no evidence that masks prevent infection” with COVID-19:
At present there is only limited and inconsistent scientific evidence to support the effectiveness of masking of healthy people in the community to prevent infection with respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2 (75). A large randomized community-based trial in which 4862 healthy participants were divided into a group wearing medical/surgical masks and a control group found no difference in infection with SARS-CoV-2 (76).
A recent systematic review found nine trials (of which eight were cluster-randomized controlled trials in which clusters of people, versus individuals, were randomized) comparing medical/surgical masks versus no masks to prevent the spread of viral respiratory illness. Two trials were with healthcare workers and seven in the community. The review concluded that wearing a mask may make little or no difference to the prevention of influenza-like illness (ILI) (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.82 to 1.18) or laboratory confirmed illness (LCI) (RR 0.91, 95%CI 0.66-1.26) (44); the certainty of the evidence was low for ILI, moderate for LCI.
The WHO also confirms adverse effects of mask wearing:
The potential disadvantages of mask use by healthy people in the general public include:
• headache and/or breathing difficulties, depending on type of mask used (55);
• development of facial skin lesions, irritant dermatitis or worsening acne, when used frequently for long hours (58, 59, 127);
• difficulty with communicating clearly, especially for persons who are deaf or have poor hearing or use lip reading (128, 129);
• discomfort (44, 55, 59)
• a false sense of security leading to potentially lower adherence to other critical preventive measures such as physical distancing and hand hygiene (105);
• poor compliance with mask wearing, in particular by young children (111, 130-132);
• waste management issues; improper mask disposal leading to increased litter in public places and environmental hazards (133);
• disadvantages for or difficulty wearing masks, especially for children, developmentally challenged persons, those with mental illness, persons with cognitive impairment, those with asthma or chronic respiratory or breathing problems, those who have had facial trauma or recent oral maxillofacial surgery and those living in hot and humid environments (55, 130).
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item ... )-outbreak

For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter »

The total net worth of the 651 billionaires in the US rose from $2.95 trillion (on 18 March) to $4.01 trillion (on 7 December) - a rise of 36%...

The top 10 billionaires combined are now worth more than $1 trillion.
Dan Gilbert, chairman of Quicken Loans, saw his wealth rocket from $6.5 billion to $41.8 billion (+543%).

Nearly 67 million Americans lost work from 21 March to 7 October 2020.
98,000 businesses in the USA have permanently closed.

Nearly 26 million Americans reported their household not having enough food in November.
From 28 October to 7 November, 7 to 11 million American children lived in a household where their parents could not afford enough food: https://www.globalresearch.ca/net-worth ... an/5731746

In the UK, special procurement channels were set up to award PPE contracts to VIPs at inflated prices!
As a matter of policy, prices of 25% above the average were paid to “VIP” suppliers, who made enormous profits on contracts sometimes worth hundreds of millions of pounds, knowing that 25% above “normal” prices would be paid.

Cabinet Office was feeding its contacts to these VIPs, outside the normal public procurement process.

PPE contracts were awarded to dubious companies, if only they had good connections.
P14 Medical Limited, controlled by former Conservative Councillor Steve Dechan, was awarded 3 contracts worth over £276 million despite having negative £485,000 in net assets.
PPE Medpro, founded by the former business associate of Conservative peer Baroness Mone, was awarded 2 contracts worth over £200 million, just 7 weeks after it was set up.

SG Recruitment UK Limited won 2 PPE contracts worth more than £50 million, despite concerns about its solvency.
Tory Peer Lord Chadlington sits on the Board of its parent company, Sumner Group Holdings Limited: https://goodlawproject.org/news/special ... -channels/

The same Sumner Group Holdings (SGH), now chaired by Lord Chadlington, since 2018 is in business with the drug trafficking, money laundering Orlando Sanchez Paredes.
Sumner knew that the Paredes the clan “is a large, high-profile Peruvian family, members of which have been publicly associated with money laundering and cocaine smuggling.

Chadlington’s brother is former cabinet minister John Selwyn Gummer.

Lord Chadlington’s daughter Naomi’s wedding was attended by Bullingdon Boy, then-PM David Cameron and wife; Jeremy Hunt later health secretary; Henry Allsopp; and the ex of Randy Andy, Duchess Camilla (godmother to the groom): https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... nanza.html

Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel is part of the World Economic Forum (of the Great Reset).
He has also worked as an executive of the notorious Eli Lilly pharmaceutical giant: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/authors/stephane-bancel
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter »

Just in time for the dangerous, experimental, untested COVID-19 vaccines, corona hysteria has reached fever pitch in North-West Europe.
The wonderful Dutch media report a whopping 9924 positive corona tests in a single day. As these numbers are inflated 200-fold this really means less than 50 positive tests. As these tests are really 90% unreliable, this means only 5 positive tests!

In the Netherlands, this includes shutting down all "non-essential" shops, which for me most crucially includes internetcafes. I depend on these places for my access to information, as I refuse to walk around with a smartphone (or other surveillance equipment), and leaving these at home, gives the intelligence agencies all the opportunity to change hard and software...
The first 2 internetcafes I tried today were open, but not their computers. I guess that the others will be closed shortly.

Hypothetically I could order "non-essiantal" clothes and other stuff, but not without access to the net.
While it also prevents me from defending myself in a court of law.

To make the charade complete, most "opposition" parties - Labour (PvdA), GreenLeft (GroenLinks) and Socialist Party (SP) - in parliament demand even more draconian lockdown rules.

I'm surprised that they even report closing schools (including primary schools!).
Today I saw teenage school children, who looked like they had spent the day at school.

I would find the whole charade a whole lot more convincing, if the following "non-essential" businesses would be closed:
- Coffeeshops (where they sell weed).
- Liquorshops.
- Airports.
(in Dutch) https://nos.nl/artikel/2360609-vergaand ... -niet.html

Obviously even in the Netherlands they can take it too far.
More and more people are getting frustrated with the never-ending lockdown, social distancing and mandatory masks.

Surprisingly even many people are considering to refuse the experimental, dangerous, untested COVID-19 vaccines.
The following polls suggest that only some 15% of the Dutch will let them poison us with these vaccines (that's of course not counting making these vaccines mandatory for "normal" activities).
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter »

It's strange how most shops are simply closed and forced into bankruptcy because they must continue to pay rent. After the big investment funds have completely hijacked the economy, they can simply restart the economy like "normal" (the "new normal" of course!) in a nice version of monopoly.

On 17 December I bought an overpriced second-hand laptop.
On 18 December, using a 2015 phone book that I has stored in my house, I ordered internet at my home from XS4ALL. They promised that the modem would be delivered on 21 or 23 December.
So on 24 December I phoned the helpdesk that nothing had been delivered. The person on the phone was obviously more shocked than me that somebody had simply put my appliance on hold indefinetely, so now it was promised that the modem would be delivered on 29/30 December.

I was surprised when I already received it on 28 December. When I again called the helpdesk because the internet connection failed, I was told that my internet connection would only start at 31 December. This was the third XS4ALL employee that I spoke to that was flabbergasted that my request for internet had simply been placed on hold...
This morning I again phoned to get told that it isn't known at what time my connection will start. But now it's working fine...
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

In May 2020 (?), a video was uploaded to and deleted by Youtube that a GSK whistleblower exposed that the COVID-19 vaccine will make 97% of the women infertile...
As I haven't seen the video, and wouldn't know how to find it, I can only say something on the articles about this video that contain interesting information on sterilisation vaccines.

In Kenya in October 2015, pharmaceutical company Agriq-Quest Ltd had their licence revoked for sterilising half a million girls using anti-HCG in the tetanus vaccine.

A study from 1994, presenting "evidence of the feasibility of a vaccine for control of human fertility” describes how the HCG sterilisation vaccines work:
We report here results of clinical trials on a birth control vaccine, consisting of a heterospecies dimer of the beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) associated noncovalently with the alpha subunit of ovine luteinizing hormone and conjugated to tetanus and diphtheria toxoids as carriers, that induces antibodies of high avidity (K(a) approximately 10(10) M-1) against hCG.
Whilst, the antibody response declines with time; fertility was regained when titers fell to < 35 ng/ml.
As fertility came back, "booster shots" are needed!

This explains that because it doesn't give other indications of sterilisation, it could be used covertly:
An advantage in choosing hCG as a target for immunocontraception is that its inactivation would not interfere with other physiological processes in the female, such as ovulation and production of sex steroid hormones.
Another this study from 1989 about “Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females" adds the following on hCG vaccines:
Vaccines inducing antibodies against the human chorionic gonadotropin have gone through phase I trials with satisfactory results. A vaccine producing a consistently bioeffective antibody response against gonadotropin-releasing hormone is ready for phase I/II clinical trials in patients of carcinoma of prostate after due experimenation in animals and toxicology studies. Research to identify sperm antigens for incorporation into second generation vaccines is in progress.
https://healingoracle.ch/2020/05/13/cor ... fertility/

The following is a typical "debunking" story, that does such a poor job that this actually makes the original, deleted video more convincing to me...
There is however some additional information on the original deleted Youtube video.

Maybe the following (61 from 63) is where the 97% figure comes from.
The speaker also says that GSK tested 63 women with a vaccine containing anti-hGC antigens that resulted in 61 becoming infertile (5m29s). Those statistics also appear in the 1989 paper and an older one, by one of the same researchers and are not related to GSK.
See the following example.
In the video the speaker says he wants to “look at who is running the vaccine trial” and names Dr Andrew Preston from the University of Bath, saying he “spoke on television the other night”. Phoenix says Dr Preston received a £28 million grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which he claims is “interfering and trying to manipulate” human vaccine trials."
It goes on to explain that this is all preposterous while admitting that Andrew Preston had an important role in the vaccine trials, and admitting that Preston received (part of) a £28 million grant from amongst others the Gates Foundation for another vaccine trial...

Even more ridiculous is that because one of the referenced studies in the video concerns cancer vaccines, this is no smoking gun (I really don't understand the "debunking argument")!
Prof Griffin said the 1989 paper referred to in the video “was obviously very deliberately about a vaccine for contraception or cancer research”.
This is all the more suspicious against the background that HPV vaccines (that have been marketed as cancer vaccines) are known to reduce fertility in women (maybe more on that in a next post):
https://www.aap.com.au/covid-19-vaccine ... from-1989/

If you want to check the named 1989 study for yourself here it is: http://archive.vn/VIpgr

The cancer study suggests that GnRH vaccines could make men so femine that this would effectively sterilise them.
The GnRH vaccine has the potential to be effective in both men and women. A study in male rats using diphtheria toxoid as the GnRH vaccine carrier reveals that antibody titers rise, testosterone levels fall, weight of testis decreases, and the prostate disappears.

To finish this post....
In August 2019, a couple of months before the first cases of the miraculous coronavirus were reported in Wuhan, China were reported, GlaxoSmithKline and Pfizer merged their consumer health care divisions...
It is of course Pfizer's sterilisation vaccine that was the first to be approved for the far from fatal COVID-19 (without a proper trial).
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: COVID-19 infertility vaccines

Post by Firestarter »

What could possibly go wrong? Even if people find out about the sterilisation vaccines there's nothing we could do about it (let's call that a democracy)!

While the pacified population in the developed world have already seen the number of child births drop dramatically, the population of poor countries is still increasing.
It looks like the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine is especially designed to "fix" that "population bomb". Oxford-AstraZeneca's vaccine seems developed for precisely those countries in Latin America, Southeast Asia and Africa, where the Galton Institute has called for reducing population growth.
Almost 160 countries have already bought the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, and it is expected that India (the country with the second largest population on Earth) will approve this vaccine in a week.

The lead developers of Oxford-AstraZeneca's sterilisation vaccine - Adrian Hill and Sarah Gilbert - are closely tied to the most infamous eugenics societies in Europe.
Both Hill and Gilbert come from the Wellcome Trust.

The Wellcome Trust was originally created by Henry Wellcome, who founded the company that later became GlaxoSmithKline.
The Wellcome Centre for Human Genetics boasts of the genetic mapping they’ve conducted in Africa. The center also publishes papers that explore genetic dispositions in relation to male fertility and “reproductive success”.
The Wellcome Centre co-funds vaccines and birth control methods together with the Gates Foundation, which admits promoting population and reproductive control in Africa and South Asia by distributing long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARCs). The Wellcome Trust has also directly funded developing methods to “improve uptake” of LARCs in places like Rwanda.

The lead developer of the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, Adrian Hill, held a senior position at the Wellcome Trust’s Centre for Human Genetics and is also closely affiliated to the Galton Institute.
Several top positions at the former British Eugenics Society (called Galton Institute since 1989) were taken by psychopaths of the Wellcome Trust, including Galton Institute’s president Turi King and Galton Institute’s Senior Genetics Researcher, Jess Buxton, who was previously ‘genetics researcher’ at the Wellcome Trust. Galton Council Member Elena Bochukova previously worked under Adrian Hill at the Wellcome Trust Center for Human Genetics.
The Galton Institute was named in honour of the so-called "father of eugenics" Sir Francis Galton. The UK Eugenics Society for more than a century has promoted racist pseudoscience to “improve racial stock” by reducing the "inferior" population (races and/or classes?).

Hill’s and Gilbert's work on the COVID-19 vaccine is through their position at Oxford's Jenner Institute (that had already started developing the corona vaccine in mid-January 2020).
The Jenner Institute’s relocation to Oxford was largely facilitated by the Medical Research Council, which donated £1.25 million in 2005 and 2006, after the decision was made to replace the institute’s original sponsors - GlaxoSmithKline, the Medical Research Council, the Department of Health - with the University of Oxford and the Institute for Animal Health (now called Pirbright Institute).

In June, Adrian Hill explained that his team was in “a race against the virus disappearing” as “We’re in the bizarre position of wanting COVID to stay, at least for a little while. But cases are declining” (it's normal that flu and cold cases in Europe and North America disappear in June...).

Emeritus professor of molecular genetics at the Galton Institute, David. J Galton, has written that the Human Genome Mapping Project had “enormously increased ... the scope for eugenics ... because of the development of a very powerful technology for the manipulation of DNA” and the new “wider definition of eugenics, would cover methods of regulating population numbers as well as improving genome quality by selective artificial insemination by donor, gene therapy or gene manipulation of germ-line cells”.
So naturally the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are DNA-altering (I'm afraid this is no joke)!

Galton didn't stipulate “whether some methods should be made compulsory by the state, or left entirely to the personal choice of the individual”: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/12/in ... -movement/

The previously mentioned Pirbright Institute is a British charity that in November 2002 was acquired by the Queen Elizabeth II controlled QinetiQ Holdings Limited: viewtopic.php?f=8&t=748&start=20#p69048

For more eugenics psychopaths placed in powerful positions...

The father of Elizabeth's PM Boris Johnson (of Oxford's notorious Bullingdon Club), Stanley Johnson, has been writing books promoting depopulation for almost half a century now, starting with “Life without Birth: A Journey Through the Third World in Search of the Population Explosion” (1970).

Stanley Johnson is a former employee of the World Bank and the European Commission, 2 of the most prominent promoters of the global warming scare.
Stanley Johnson wrote the introduction and commentary to the UN’s 1993 Rio Earth Summit, wherein the policies of technocratic Agenda 21 were articulated.

Boris’ maternal grandfather was James Fawcett, who assisted in writing of the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights in 1948.
From 1955 to 1960, Fawcett was general counsel to the IMF and a member of the European Commission of Human Rights from 1962 to 1984 (being its president from 1972 to 1982).
From 1969 to 1973, Fawcett was also director of studies at the Royal Institute of International Affairs (a.k.a. Chatham House): https://www.winterwatch.net/2019/12/mee ... -made-man/


The COVID-19 "pandemic" has made 50 pharmaceutical executives billionaires, with 28 from China.

The new billionaires include the co-founder of BioNTech, which helped develop the Pfizer vaccine, Uğur Şahin, and the CEO of Massachusetts-based Moderna Stéphane Bancel: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... aires.html

A video from Ben Swann, who argues that the billionaires will use their power to keep the economy in the coronavirus lockdown, as U.S. billionaires saw their wealth increase by $1 trillion since the pandemic was started.
For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
User avatar
Posts: 1710
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 3:02 pm

Re: Wuhan coronavirus outbreak hysteria

Post by Firestarter »

The Commons nursing home in Cayuga County (New York) started poisoning residents and nurses with the COVID-19 vaccine on 22 December.
Starting a week later, 29 December, they began dying, already 24 residents "of COVID-19" (11% of the residents). With more to come?

So far 193 residents (80% in the nursing home), were poisoned with the vaccine:
https://www.syracuse.com/coronavirus/20 ... ls-24.html

Since 5 January, an additional 20 residents at The Commons in Auburn (New York) have died.
After mass vaccination was started on 22 December (263 residents have been vaccinated so far) at least 32 residents have died (no information on how many of these were vaxxed): https://www.foxnews.com/health/coronavi ... ead-report

Are nursing homes the most dangerous places in the world?
Is COVID-19 as deadly as our wonderful media are insinuating (where are all the people dying in the street)? If only the vaccine would've been ready 2 weeks earlier...

Or doesn't the COVID-19 vaccine protect against the coronavirus (with the 0.1% fatality rate)?
Or are all (or most of) these deaths caused by the not properly tested Pfizer corona vaccine?

Norwegian health authorities have actually admitted that the COVID-19 vaccine has caused the death of 13 elderly people, who have been autopsied and "showed signs of suffering side effects such as fever and nausea".
And that the untested vaccine could have caused the deaths of another 10 elderly people (23 diseased in total):
We cannot rule out that adverse reactions to the vaccine occurring within the first days following vaccination (such as fever and nausea) may contribute to more serious course and fatal outcome in patients with severe underlying disease.
Norway has confirmed that 29 people have suffered from adverse effects shortly after getting the Pfizer or Moderna coronavirus vaccine. In total more than 30,000 people have been vaxxed. That sounds impossible (only) 29 adverse effects, compared to 13 (or 23) deaths.
Also strange that 21 of these 29 that suffered adverse effect are women: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... armed.html


An astonishing percentage of people poisoned with the experimental Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were seriously injured.

After vaccination started on 14 December, CDC data shows that already on 18 December, 3,150 people were suffering from adverse effects as serious as “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work” .

This is 2.7% of the 112,807 who were vaccinated until 18 December.
This is 4.6% of the 67,963 who were vaccinated until 17 December.
Also note that the number of pregnancies are carefully monitored (Page 6): https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meeti ... -CLARK.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/202101020855 ... -CLARK.pdf)

This should be more than enough reason to stop the massive vaccination campaign especially against the background that the (obviously rigged) 2 month vaccine trials reported (only) 0.6% adverse effects from the experimental vaccines.
This is from a "big" study of 43,448 "healthy" test subjects, half got 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and the other half placebo.
In vaccine recipients, the most commonly reported systemic events were fatigue and headache (59% after the first dose and 52% after the second dose among younger vaccine recipients; 51% after the first dose and 39% after the second dose among older recipients).
Fatigue and headache were also reported by many placebo recipients (23% after the first dose and 24% after the second dose among younger vaccine recipients; 17% after the first dose and 14% after the second dose among older recipients). 
Fever (temperature ≥38 C) was reported after the second dose by 16% of younger vaccine recipients, and by 11% of older recipients. 
The incidence of serious adverse events was similar in the vaccine and placebo groups (0.6% and 0.5%, respectively).
Can anybody think of a good reason for why younger test subjects suffer more adverse effects than older people?
Unfortunately no information on the difference in adverse effects between the genders.

An important aspect of "science" is describing what to do beforehand. When they change the trials, this is by definition rigging. This is also evidence that the trial wasn't properly double-blind, because they couldn't makes changes to the protocol (knowing the efficacy) if they didn't know who got the vaccine and who the placebo.
The report includes 2 months of follow up after the second dose of the vaccine for only half of the trial participants.  
Due to the high efficacy found in the trial, the original plan of following placebo recipients for 2 years will not be followed due to ethical concerns. Therefore, there will be no placebo group with which to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
For some reason they only followed half of the trial subjects. So in reality there is only information on some 21,700. Excluding half is another sign of rigging these trials.
Following the people injected with placebo for a mere 2 months, because it would not "ethical". So basically a proper study is unethical.
You can't know the efficacy or adverse effects of the vaccine without a (placebo) control group!

Pregnant women were excluded from the trial, but not completely.
Of note, women were screened for pregnancy prior to each trial vaccination, according to a Pfizer-BioNTech briefing document. A total of 23 pregnancies occurred, some after vaccination and some that occurred prior to vaccination but were not detected via screening. Twelve pregnant individuals received the vaccine, and 11 received placebo. No unsolicited adverse events, including spontaneous abortion, occurred.
https://www.idsociety.org/covid-19-real ... 9-Vaccine/


If I would have "predicted" anything like the complete lockdown of our "freedom" a year ago, people would have declared me a lunatic.
The following still seems farfetched, but if the UK imposes a measure, much of our Brave new world will follow.

The British government has reportedly discussed even stricter COVID-19 restrictions, by forbidding much of the population to leave their homes more than only once per week (that wouldn't be imprisonment would it?).

Other restrictions that are considered.
A curfew (that would probably be done before the 6 days a week lockup).
Mandatory mask-wearing outdoors.

According to these psychopaths, the lockdown isn't harsh enough already, causing people to abuse the rules and going "for a coffee in the park with their friends” for example.
Between the lines, I read that the real concern is that people actually talk to each other. This must obviously be prevented at all costs, as free speech is very dangerous to a government build on lies.

A new policy of even more police brutality has already started, with the plan to increase fines for breaking the corona rules, from £200 to £500.
Be sure to watch the video, where 2 people get arrested, after trying to reason with the cops that they did nothing "wrong": https://summit.news/2021/01/11/uk-gover ... ce-a-week/


In the Kingdom of the Netherlands we have the "right" to protest but only when the authorities give permission...

After the Dutch Government announced it is considering tightening the coronavirus restrictions even further, including an 8pm to 4am curfew (most shops are already closed, while primary and highschools remain partially open), some terrible "extremists" went ahead with an "illegal" corona protest in Amsterdam, even though Mayor Femke Halsema didn't permit it.

This afternoon thousands of protesters came together at the Museumplein for the demonstration.
Around 3.30 pm, after they had been ordered to leave, the riot squad made an end to the peaceful protest (less violently than I've seen at other occasions): https://pathofex.com/amsterdam-protests ... fireworks/

This afternoon I saw a car driving in the direction of the Museumplein, advertising the "vaxxed 2" documentary. That was shortly before the riot squad...

See the protesters most without masks, and the riot squad.

Last Friday, in preparation of the 17 March general election, the Dutch cabinet has "resigned".
This was over a scandal that involved the tax revenue service (Belastingdienst) illegally handing out fines, while not giving families the subsidies they were entitled to.

PM Mark Rutte said he expects the full support of parliament to continue to take away our constitutional rights because of the coronavirus "pandemic".
Of course King Willem-Alexander will keep his dictatorial powers, including appointing fascist Mayors, so I don't expect that anything will really change (except for ever more draconian corona measures): https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2021/01/c ... signation/


Germany plans to lock up COVID-19 "dissidents" in a "detention camp" located in Dresden. Designed for those horrible "criminals" who don't follow the new corona "fascism".

After Corona "violators" get a warning followed by a fine, the "new normal" judge can sentence them to the "detention camp".

Maybe you've heard that there have actually been mass protests (a million in Berlin) against the COVID-19 lockdown.

I for one think that it's smart that they don't call it a "concentration camp".
I really can't explain what's the difference with "political prisoners": https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/01/15/g ... tion-camp/

The following 1979 German film "The Hamburg Syndrome" comes eerily close to what's happening (English subtitles): https://www.bitchute.com/video/7e08ix1XOksD/

For some reason internet “search” engines block my posts: http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread ... orld/page2

The Order of the Garter rules the world: viewtopic.php?p=5549#p5549
Post Reply