Maybe there are other explanations, but I do consider the clot shots a prime suspect...
In England, the mortality rate for 18-39-year-olds in January 2021 was 67.7 deaths for the unvaxxed, compared to 119.9 deaths per 100,000 years for the "partly vaccinated".
It's a great mystery what could have caused this rise in heart attacks after the clot shots were emergency approved.
In Scotland there was a 67% increase in the number of heart attacks suffered by young adults. See how this has been steadily rising since May 2021 for age 15-44.
Also see the rise of ambulances age 15-44 in Scotland in 2021, after introduction of the clot shots, compared to the 2018-2019 "historical average" in Scotland.
In the UK, the number of ambulance call-outs for heart attacks rose with some 50% in 2021/2022 (after the COVID vaccination campaign started), compared to the previous years.
It went from roughly 2000 per month (of which 350 younger than 30) to more than 3000 per month (of which more than 600 younger than 30).
Also see the number of myocarditis reported to the US VAERS suddenly rising.
https://expose-news.com/2022/06/09/covi ... -syndrome/
The following disclosed confidential Pfizer document sort of confirms this rate of (spontaneous) abortions after the COVID vaccines...Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 6:57 amThe following scientific-looking paper exposes that the claims that the COVID sterilisation vaccines don't cause spontaneous abortions is nothing but a lie (they use different words to explain this though).
In reality the COVID vaccines increase the risk of abortions 7–8 times.
In table 6 (page 12) we read that until 28 February 2021, 270 pregnant women had been injected with the Pizer COVID vaccine.
.Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).
I have a hard time figuring out which percentage of these foetuses died. I count that 28 babies died in total (abortion, neonatal death).
28 of 270 is more than 10% (similar to the earlier reported death rate).
But because for 238 cases “no outcome was provided”, the real rate of abortions could be (is) much higher.
I guess that most of these women simply had not finished their pregnancy (having to wait 9 months or so). It's hard (if not impossible) to calculate the true (much higher) abortion rate after the vaccines, without additional information...
Maybe even more troubling is that 124 of the 270 pregnant women (almost 50%) had an adverse reaction, of which 75 serious (more than 25%!): https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/20 ... rience.pdf
(http://web.archive.org/web/202205301210 ... rience.pdf)
Maybe the story about Brook Jackson's legal case, will get more publicity than her article that was published in September 2021, and almost completely ignored by most media.Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Nov 04, 2021 6:57 amA regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding.
It looks like Brook Jackson will lose the lawsuit.
Pfizer asked the US court to throw Jackson's lawsuit out as they didn't violate any protocols under its contract with the government, because Pfizer was a “nontraditional defense contractor”. In other words, the contract allowed scientific fraud: https://tennesseestar.com/2022/06/01/wh ... nspirator/
Did the X-files predict 9/11, the COVID plandemic and the mRNA vaccines, in the "The Red and the Black" episode first broadcast on 8 March 1998?!?