"Liberty Act" and FISA Memo

Closely related to self-defense, this Board focuses in other aspects such as Communications, and Financial.
Post Reply
User avatar
Posts: 819
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 1:16 pm

"Liberty Act" and FISA Memo

Post by notmartha »

Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) was set to expire on December 31, 2017.

In October, the USA Liberty Act hit the House Judiciary Committee. You can read a summary HERE or the Act HERE.

Keeping in mind that acts like this do completely opposite of how they are sold (remember the "Patriot Act" and the "Religious Liberty Act"?) this act just liberates govco.

Basically, it promotes the surveillance state by extending Section 702's spying on Americans another 6 years, and changes the way privacy-robbing "incidental" collections of info from Americans are handled, all in the name of national security, of course..

From the Washington Examiner:
The House voted Thursday [1-11-18] to pass a bill reauthorizing an important national counterterrorism tool, after a bipartisan fight over privacy protections in the legislation nearly derailed the legislation.

In a 256-164 vote, lawmakers approved a six-year reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which allows intelligence officials to spy on communications of noncitizens outside of the United States.

The bill includes moderate reforms authored by both the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees last year. Proponents say the changes will bolster privacy protections by adding a new requirement for intelligence agencies to obtain search warrants to search communications and new congressional oversight of the kinds of searches made by the government. It also limits the use of the surveillance authority so fewer Americans are caught up in the searches and requires reforms to the way intelligence agencies search the contents of electric communications beyond the sender information.

“This really is a compromise,” said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif.
Hmmm..... this was voted on BEFORE Nunes decided to release his now infamous FISA memo. You can read that HERE.

Judge Napolitano Had This To Say About Why The House Waited So Long To Release The FISA Memo:
Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano claimed that House members delayed the release of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) memo because they wanted to expand FISA powers and were afraid the political fallout from the memo would have killed the bill.

“Ignorant of the hot potato on which the House Intelligence Committee had been sitting, Congress recently passed and President Donald Trump signed a vast expansion of spying authorities,” Napolitano wrote in a Wednesday op-ed. “The FISA expansion would never have passed the Senate had the House Intelligence Committee memo and the data on which it is based come to light seven days sooner than it did.”

“Why should 22 members of a House committee keep their 500-plus congressional colleagues in the dark about domestic spying abuses while those colleagues were debating the very subject matter of domestic spying and voting to expand the power of those who have abused it?” Napolitano added.

Napolitano thinks the culture of the intelligence community has taken a dark turn and has exerted its authority over America’s elected officials.

“The NSA shows its might to the legislators who supposedly regulate it. In reality, the NSA regulates them,” Napolitano wrote. “This is but one facet of the deep state — the unseen parts of the government that are not authorized by the Constitution and that never change, no matter which party controls the legislative or executive branch. This time, they almost blew it. If just one conscientious senator had changed her or his vote on the FISA expansion — had that senator known of the NSA and FBI abuses of FISA concealed by the House Intelligence Committee — the expansion would have failed.”

Napolitano also believes former deputy director Andrew McCabe was dismissed from the FBI because of the contents of the memo, and said McCabe had been confirmed as one of the “abusers of spying authority.”

“The government works for us; we should not tolerate its treating us as children,” Napolitano writes. “Where is the personal courage on the House Intelligence Committee? Where is the patriotism? Where is the fidelity to the Constitution? The government exists by our consent. It derives its powers from us. We have a right to know what it has done in our names, who broke our trust, who knew about it, who looked the other way and why and by whom all this was intentionally hidden until after Congress voted to expand FISA.”
Lysander Spooner said, "Practically speaking, no government knows any limits to its power, except the endurance of the people. But that the people are stronger than the government, and will resist in extreme cases, our governments would be little or nothing else than organized systems of plunder and oppression." ...and surveillance...

BTW, does anyone else think it was no accident that the memo was released while everyone is focused on the Roman circus?
Post Reply