[Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

The most numerous and, collectively, the most powerful form of government on earth is the family. This is why worldly governments are so obsessed with destroying and undermining families.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

Even though the set-up "demonstration project" ended Title IV-D is still allegedly valid as law, so is welfare recovery still valid into child support enforcement jurisdiction under the new Bill Clinton Welfare Reform - this falls under "jurisdiction based upon parental responsibility".
viewtopic.php?p=6151#p6151
Last edited by Brick Layer on Tue Nov 05, 2019 8:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

🚩 "Flag on the play!!!" The Child Support Enforcement Program is being implemented under the guise of Title IV-D without full disclosure(s) being made to American families; the fact the Child Support Enforcement Progam merely treaty implemented by the state(s)!

U.S. Constitution Article I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei
Section 10.
No state shall enter into any treaty, alliance, or confederation; grant letters of marque and reprisal; coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts; pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law impairing the obligation of contracts, or grant any title of nobility.
No state shall, without the consent of the Congress, lay any imposts or duties on imports or exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it's inspection laws: and the net produce of all duties and imposts, laid by any state on imports or exports, shall be for the use of the treasury of the United States; and all such laws shall be subject to the revision and control of the Congress.
No state shall, without the consent of Congress, lay any duty of tonnage, keep troops, or ships of war in time of peace, enter into any agreement or compact with another state, or with a foreign power, or engage in war, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent danger as will not admit of delay.

THE CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM
Unconstitutional, 'Private International Law' --
...it's still ALL based on consent!!!

Image

"In exercising its positive Commerce Clause power, “Congress has often passed legislation to help the States solve problems that defy local solution.” Sage, 92 F.3d at 105."
Image

"It is important to note that such an agreement between the parties in the U.S. would be treated as a contract" Hague Convention

When PUSH COMES TO SHOVE - eh The U.S. Constitution is the foundation of the united states federal government including the federal judiciary... the federal courts would be hard-pressed to rule treaty over constitution (constitution vs. treaty); the Hague Child Support Convention 'treaty' interjecting private international law into and or onto American families.
Last edited by Brick Layer on Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

Brick Layer wrote: Sat Sep 21, 2019 3:56 pm 🚩 "Flag on the play!!!" The Child Support Enforcement Program is being implemented under the guise of Title IV-D without full disclosure(s) being made to American families; the fact the Child Support Enforcement Progam merely treaty implemented And/Or entered into by the state(s)!!!

U.S. Constitution Article I
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei
Section 10.
No state shall enter into any treaty...


The U.S. Constitution is the foundation of the united states federal government including the federal judiciary... the federal courts would be hard-pressed to rule treaty over constitution (constitution vs. treaty); the Hague Child Support Convention 'treaty' interjecting private international law into and or onto American families.

constitution vs. treaty
Last edited by Brick Layer on Tue Nov 05, 2019 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Brick Layer
Posts: 46
Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 8:44 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by Brick Layer »

Brick Layer wrote: Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:50 pmImage
Blessing v. Freestone and Leon Koziol Image
"...contemporary civil rights issues."

https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme- ... 0/329.html
Title IV-D contains no private remedy--either judicial or administrative--through which aggrieved persons can seek redress. The only way that Title IV-D assures that States live up to their child support plans is through the Secretary's oversight, but the Secretary's limited powers to audit and cut federal funding are not comprehensive enough to foreclose §1983 liability. Pp. 15-18.
https://www.docketbird.com/court-docume ... 1361-00008
Last edited by Brick Layer on Mon Oct 28, 2019 11:55 pm, edited 2 times in total.
MarcoRizer
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:34 am
Contact:

Re: [Title IV and Title IV-D] Hit em' where it hurts - Funding!!!

Post by MarcoRizer »

justincredible1984 wrote: Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:30 am Has any Man in this forum presented them selvs sui juris in there divorce? Any sucesses? I need help. I have spent the last 8 months on studing all this stuff and I would like some feed back and bounce some ideas off of each other. Thanks
I would just say i did and it was a bad idea.
Post Reply