Page 4 of 4

Re: Conspiracy Theories

Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2020 1:18 am
by southerntartan
This happens less frequently in the USA than it does in New Zealand. But Cleveland Ohio is another kill zone. Most of the schools in the Cleveland metropolitan area are fake.

Watch this video of a spoof tour of Cleveland heights high school. At 4:47 in the video, they actually say "WELCOME TO THE FAKE SCHOOL." The classrooms have only a small number of students. They are local actors. At 1:47, a student bursts out of a locker and the text onscreen reads "IT'S A NINJA". Kids who enrol at the school get jumped by actual ninjas. At 2:55, a teacher gives the 666 hand sign with both hands.

Cleveland heights high
https://youtu.be/qYHdqnUGC4c

fake schools
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rzi6n8eCkUI

The city of Cleveland was set up by the Connecticut land company. Connecticut is another kill zone.

Re: Moon landing hoax

Posted: Tue May 11, 2021 7:13 am
by Firestarter
In many ways the Apollo moon landing footage that was broadcast "live" all around the globe, was the most important "evidence" that it happened. According to NASA, the tapes of the first Apollo 11 moon landing were erased to safe costs.
Just look at the poor quality of this footage which, makes it difficult for me to understand how anybody could've believed this sh*t...
Firestarter wrote: Sat Jun 30, 2018 4:30 pmAlso see from 0:54 in the video - The astronaut walks in front of the pole, but we can still see the pole through him (why doesn't he leave a trail?)...

https://youtu.be/3CMlHmURHm0
.

The videos of the second moon landings, Apollo 12, got even worse! Now according to NASA, astronut Alan Bean accidentally pointed the camera towards the Sun, making the screen go "black" and then they broadcast "astronauts" doing the moonwalk in a studio!
Fortunately, the TV networks had a back-up plan. While continuing to carry the live voices of the astronauts, CBS switched to a studio where two actors dressed in spacesuits simulate the Moonwalk.
NBC, meanwhile, commissioned puppeteer Bil Baird to build astronaut marionettes. Baird (who would train Muppet creator Jim Henson) operated the puppets from an overhead gantry above a simulated lunar landscape. Despite having the word “simulation” on the screen, Baird is quoted as saying that many viewers never realised it wasn’t real.
.
Maybe they did this to show contrast to "normal" gravity?
Starting at 5:40 is the "simulation"...
https://youtu.be/7_II3gYd3LE

This wasn't the only unbelievable strange thing happening for which they needed a "back-up plan" to make the hoax more interesting for the masses...
After the launch from earth, most electrical systems in the rocket crashed. Then they had some sort of magical "SCE" button to save the day. Are there really people who believe this?!?
“Then this young man from a little college in Oklahoma named John Aaron, who was at that point around 25, I'd guess, made a call,” says Griffin.
“He says: ‘Tell him to try SCE to Aux’ – I had never heard of the switch and I said, ‘What?’”
Aaron repeated the instruction. Griffin turned to the Capcom (capsule communicator) responsible for talking to the crew, Jerry Carr.

“So, I tell him to say. ‘Try ‘SCE to Aux’ and Carr said ‘What?’…at that point, Aaron said ‘Try SCE to auxiliary’, so that’s what he transmitted to the crew.”
But Conrad had never heard of the switch either. “Try FCE to Auxiliary?” he says to the ground, and then to his crewmates: “What the hell is that?”
Fortunately, Bean knew the switch – it was right in front of him. SCE stands for Signal Conditioning Equipment, the system that processed spacecraft sensor data for transmission to the ground.
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/2019 ... m-disaster


Some "conspiracy theorists" have argued that wires were used to make it appear that the astronuts were really walking on the moon in low gravity.
The poor quality of the films would surely make this easier to fake. In contrast the photos were of a high quality, showing how easy it would have been, if there were actually astronauts on the moon, to make high quality video...

It doesn't make much sense to me to have the astronuts wired in to simulate one-sixth gravity as preparation for a moon. It does however make sense that they needed to train for moon landing videos that were made in a studio, using a wire system to simulate low gravity.
See Alan L. Bean preparing for the upcoming Apollo 12 lunar landing movie, strapped into a one-sixth gravity simulator in Building 29 at the Manned Spacecraft Center.
Image
https://www.space.com/40712-alan-bean-a ... hotos.html
(https://archive.is/KX37D)


Here's a video of low-gravity simulation using wires. This really looks like slow motion, just like the Apollo moon landings videos that were sold to us as the "real thing".
EDIT Video (youtube.com/watch?v=U1CUhz0U-Gc) was made "private". Here's an alternative that can still be watched...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SBetDGrp00


If somebody would have fallen down on the moon, because of vacuum, a tiny hole in those magical suits would mean instant death. Those suits would severely hamper movement.
If somebody would fall down in a wired one-sixth gravity simulator, it would look something like this...
Image

Re: Moon landing hoax

Posted: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:02 pm
by Firestarter
The following documentary touches on some of the most important evidence that no American astronuts ever went to the moon...
The most important information added tot this thread is the analysis of the video footage and photos. Including interviews with some Italian professional photogrpahers, whose comments are hard to explain otherwise that the photos that were supposedly taken "on" the moon were faked in a studio right here on earth (more than 3 1/2 hours).
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY


Wires, lost technology and more NASA BS...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z6BgMt0GQP5K/


NASA has also admitted that they can't get working spacesuits by 2024...
So what in hell were they wearing from 1969 to 1972: https://spacenews.com/lunar-spacesuits- ... 4-landing/

NASA fakery; vacuum chambers; Artemis

Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2022 9:31 pm
by Firestarter
Photographer Gary Fong explains that the moon photos couldn't have been made on the moon (and returned to earth).
https://youtu.be/sDggkBUSZl8


NASA's Space Power Facility (SPF), thermal vacuum chamber with a 40 ton, 40 feet diameter door, 122 feet (37 m) high and 100 feet (30 m) in diameter is currently the largest in the world.
It is the updated vacuum chamber that was already in use in 1969.
Image

Strangely no radiation weapons to create sunlight, but instead they use "background heating and cooling", which is fine to make it as cold as space in the shade, but NOT comparable to the intense radiation of the sunlight (not even in the updated chamber in 2022!): https://www.space.com/20535-nasa-vacuum ... scope.html

They would have needed something like the above round door (of course a lot smaller, and turning to the inside) for the lunar module instead of this flimsy hatch.
Firestarter wrote: Sat Oct 06, 2018 9:07 amSee the hatch of the 13 Lunar Module turning to the inside.
Image
.
There is however another much smaller testing facility that supposedly does simulate the harsh conditions near the sun.
Too small to test the magical space suits, let alone the lunar or main module (and as far as I can tell not in use in 1969): https://www.madeinalabama.com/2016/07/n ... e-hazards/


Personally, I think that postponing the launch of the rocket to the moon over and over again, 50 years after supposedly the last time American astronuts were pole dancing and playing golf on the moon, sort of proves that the Apollo moon landings were a hoax.
I don't believe that even with 2022 technology it's possible to put people on the moon and bring them back to earth.
But they now have finally launched an unmanned rocket that will fly around the moon a couple of times, and return...

NASA's lost technology doesn't add up, with a flat earth outro...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zEgpb0yBsXrL/

Planned Moon landing, 2026?

Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2023 8:58 pm
by Firestarter
It looks like they will stage a moon landing in Biden's second term as president (or will Donald or Ron enter the White House?)...
The unmanned test flights by Elon Musk's SpaceX confirm the importance of testing, as the lunar module can't be tested in vacuum, while they won't even perform the tests that could hypothetically be done, it's clear that it's nothing more than a show for entertaining the masses.
While those magical space suits at the current state of technology could be tested, I doubt that they could design them so they could actually walk around in them on the moon surface (without dying).


The plan is really strange...
1) SpaceX will launch the Super Heavy booster with the Starship HLS (lunar module) into Earth orbit, where it will be refueled;
2) The umanned Starship HLS will "boost" into a lunar near-rectilinear halo orbit;

3) In lunar orbit, the Starship HLS will connect with a Orion spacecraft that was launched by NASA, with astronuts going from the Orion into the Starship HLS to descend to the moon;
4) After 7 days on the moon surface the astronuts will launch the Starship HLS to fly back to the Orion in lunar orbit that will fly them back to earth.

If I understand the reasoning behind this strange set-up, in this way the Starship HLS requires less shielding because it won't return to earth.
It doesn't make sense to fly the Orion and the the Starship HLS seperately to the moon, especially as it is supposedly possible to (re)fuel them in earth orbit: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starship_HLS

.
Firestarter wrote: Sat Aug 18, 2018 4:50 pmSee how the Lunar Module descended.
Image
Of course this doesn't include the 6000 km/h speed, but it still seems amazing that a rocket could descend not by a parachute, but by its thrust.
After 4 Starship HLS prototypes crashed, a successful landing was made with the SN15 prototype on 5 May 2021, but with a fire in the engine that had to be extinguished.

It doesn't look real to me (at least not very convincing)...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3pptc1_S4so


In theory, even the Super Heavy Starship would be able to land (obviously SpaceX couldn't figure out that a parachute is more easily engineered!) by descending to the launch pad and be caught in flight by 2 "chopstick arms": https://www.lemonde.fr/en/science/artic ... 49_10.html


On 20 April 2023, an unmanned test of the Super Heavy Starship in South Texas, with 33 engines (they couldn't have picked another number could they?) was a planned failure strictly for entertainment purposes with the audience (of engineers) sheering like mad, after it crashed after only 3 minutes.
This looks "real" to me though...
https://youtu.be/oZN0cN0_Khg


In November 2022, NA$A gave us this wonderful video of the unmanned Artemis 1 moon mission, about as "good" as what it gave us 50 years ago...
"You can tell it's real because it looks so fake" (almost 3 1/2 hours).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvWtNx3VOUA

NASA, satanism, animation

Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2023 6:39 pm
by Firestarter
The following video argues that NASA’s space program is an occult ritual to the ancient Egyptian gods (Horus, Osiris). I doubt that this was NASA’s main objective, but there is some interesting information in the video regardless whether that’s true.

German Nazi’s were deeply involved in the occult, including Heinrich Himmler.
Through Project Paperclip, the US recruited Nazi “scientists”, including Wernher von Braun, who later worked for NASA.

Satanist Madame Blavatsky also wrote about space exploration and aliens.

Many NASA astronuts, including Buzz Aldrin, were freemasons.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZTdIRb7zTY
(edited, shorter version) https://youtu.be/hpucg6Pu5O0


Maybe the most interesting from this documentary are the satanic links between “rocket scientist” Jack Parsons and Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. While this is interesting information it also shows the dubious reasoning in this documentary.
Parsons died years before NASA was founded, so there wasn’t much of a link between the two...

Aleister Crowley selected Jack Parsons as the grand master of the US lodge of Crowley’s Ordo Templi Orientis, Agape.
Science fiction writer L. Ron Hubbard, founder of Scientology, was also associated with Parsons and the OTT.

Jack Parsons founded the Jet Propulsion Laboratory that was later involved in developing rocket engines (where there any real engines?) for NASA’s rockets: https://alt.slack.narkive.com/U3fLO9U0/ ... i-orientis
(https://archive.is/vGOxF)


I’ve previously posted in this thread about NASA recruiting Nazi scientist, and the huge amount of astronut freemasons.
I think the most relevant in this context is that NASA actually recruited science fiction fans, including Nazis, that had previously been involved in making space movies.
Firestarter wrote: Sun Jul 29, 2018 3:17 pmSo Oberth and the young Von Braun were already involved in special effects for the movies long before they came to the US to work their “magic”...
See Hermann Oberth in the forefront with Wernher von Braun seated right behind him at the Army Ballistic Missile Agency at Huntsville, Alabama in 1956. Also pictured Ernst Stuhlinger (seated on the left); H.N. Toftoy, Commanding Officer and responsible for "Project Paperclip" (in uniform); and Robert Lusser (standing on the right).
Image
.


Buzz Aldrin tells Conan O’Brien that we watched an “animation” of the moon landing.
O’Brien says:
Let’s talk about this because this is fascinating. I remember very clearly; I think anybody who was alive at the time does. I remember my parents waking me up and we went down, and we watched you guys land on the moon.
.
Aldrin responds:
No, you didn’t. Because there wasn’t any television, there wasn’t anybody taking the picture. You watched animation so you associated what you saw with … you heard me talking about, you know, how many feet we’re going to the left and right and then I said contact light, engine stopped, a few other things and then Neil said ‘Houston, tranquility base. The Eagle has landed.’ How about that? Not a bad line.
https://youtu.be/1Y30VAkHtdw


NASA admits that (all?) space pictures aren’t really photos, but animation…
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fnlqDUZkR7bb/

Re: Moon landing hoax

Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:32 am
by veritas
Firestarter wrote: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:02 pm The following documentary touches on some of the most important evidence that no American astronuts ever went to the moon...
The most important information added tot this thread is the analysis of the video footage and photos. Including interviews with some Italian professional photogrpahers, whose comments are hard to explain otherwise that the photos that were supposedly taken "on" the moon were faked in a studio right here on earth (more than 3 1/2 hours).
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY


Wires, lost technology and more NASA BS...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z6BgMt0GQP5K/


NASA has also admitted that they can't get working spacesuits by 2024...
So what in hell were they wearing from 1969 to 1972: https://spacenews.com/lunar-spacesuits- ... 4-landing/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4nUpam_72Q

Re: Moon landing hoax

Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:35 am
by veritas
veritas wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:32 am https://youtu.be/P4nUpam_72Q
Firestarter wrote: Fri Apr 22, 2022 8:02 pm The following documentary touches on some of the most important evidence that no American astronuts ever went to the moon...
The most important information added tot this thread is the analysis of the video footage and photos. Including interviews with some Italian professional photogrpahers, whose comments are hard to explain otherwise that the photos that were supposedly taken "on" the moon were faked in a studio right here on earth (more than 3 1/2 hours).
https://youtu.be/KpuKu3F0BvY


Wires, lost technology and more NASA BS...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Z6BgMt0GQP5K/


NASA has also admitted that they can't get working spacesuits by 2024...
So what in hell were they wearing from 1969 to 1972: https://spacenews.com/lunar-spacesuits- ... 4-landing/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4nUpam_72Q
https://youtu.be/P4nUpam_72Q

Re: Moon landing hoax

Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2023 7:53 am
by Firestarter
veritas wrote: Tue Oct 24, 2023 9:35 am
https://youtu.be/P4nUpam_72Q
Posting a hoax video twice?!?
.
The video itself contains a montage of scenes with overdubbed voices. Some scenes appear to show authentic footage from the Apollo 11 mission, while others show activity on a film set.

There is no record of the video being released by WikiLeaks. Further, the video contains already publicly available "behind the scenes" footage from the fictional 1970s movie "Capricorn One."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/fac ... 217263002/