The Lawful Path         Narrow is the Path to the Truth TLP Home
  Home   Reading-Room   Catalog   Springboard   Forum   Contact    
The Lawful Path Web

A.D. 1996

Welcome to The Lawful Path

This Site is dedicated to study of the True Law, and a return to Lawful Government. We pray that you will enjoy your visit, and maybe find some help if you're in need. It is Our Hope that the Information found Here will awaken and instruct all who enter.

May the One True God bless you, and keep you on the lawful path.

April 10th: Regarding the Heartbleed Bug. A vulnerability has been uncovered in all versions of OpenSSL, which is the encryption software protecting nearly all ecommerce on the Internet. Apparently, this bug has existed since December 31, 2011, and has allowed attackers to view private encrypted data on effected websites. Most virus warnings you read on the Internet are re-hashed hoaxes, but it appears this one is for real.

OpenSSL is open source software. Open source is usually immune, or nearly so, to these kind of vulnerabilities. The reason for this is because, since the source code is open and available for anyone to see, flaws such as this usually come to light quickly, and are fixed. The fact that this vulnerability has existed for more than two years leads me to believe it was most likely engineered by people in the U.S. government (NSA), and that these same people have been the primary attackers taking advantage of the bug.

The existence of the bug became known on April 7, three days ago. On the SAME DAY, the developers of OpenSSL released a patch which disables the bug, and stops the attackers dead in their tracks.

It is important to realize that this software is used by both Unix based, and Windows based servers, and that any server which is not upgraded with a patched version of OpenSSL will remain vulnerable. It is my understanding and belief that when vulnerabilities come to light, Windows based servers are usually vulnerable for a much longer period than Unix based servers-- first because Microsoft takes their sweet time about releasing security updates, and second, because (in my opinion) the administrators of Windows servers tend to be less diligent and/or less competent.

In any case, I want to caution all of our readers about this bug. Some servers may go unpatched for years! Users of large servers such as Yahoo, Facebook, Gmail, Amazon, etc., are the biggest targets. It is assumed they will all patch their servers promptly, if they have not done so already, but I advise you to do some checking to be sure, particularly if you use any financial services over the Internet. Experts are suggesting the average internet user wait a week or so for things to "shake out", before conducting business online.

To our Patrons: We thank you again for your support. Please rest assured that we patched our own servers moments after receiving notice of the bug. I have also personally verified that Paypal guarantees they have no vulnerabilites to this bug.

The important question to ask your vendors is this: What is the build date of the version of OpenSSL on your server? If the date is prior to April 7, 2014, do not conduct business with them until they upgrade.

January 16th: Good news! We just fixed the instant download script in our Catalog. Digital files are now delivered instantly by email. If you experience any problems we want to know about it. Please contact us and we'll fix it.

January 12th: We just moved to a different physical server. Nothing changes as far as the operation of the server, however the Forum will be down for awhile-- anywhere from a few hours to a couple days, depending on how long it takes for the DNS records to propagate. Thanks for your patience.

November 15th: Today I'm taking a break from the usual activist topics, and writing about an unusual addition to our catalog.

I have a friend named Mike, who is one of the handiest guys I know. Mike knows more about hunting, fishing, and trapping (yes, trapping), than even most old-timers have forgotten. He's a man of many talents, and an exception to the old adage "jack of all trades, but master of none." When Mike sets out to do something, he strives to do the best possible job.

Mike paints beautiful landscapes, and carves custom duck decoys and mountable fish replicas. He recently started making soap, and various kinds of body lotions and creams. He's already got his products into several stores, and is on the verge of quitting his day-job so he'll have more time to do his own thing.

For many years, Mike has been making his own beer. True to his nature, Mike worked hard to find the easiest and cheapest way to make really good beer.

Back in the summer, Mike and I were sitting around a campfire, enjoying a couple of his homebrews. I asked him some questions about how he made it, and before long I asked him if he'd be willing to write a book about it. He agreed, on the condition I'd help him by doing the editing and layout.

The resulting book is called Making Beer the Easy Way, and it is now available in our Catalog.

If you've ever wanted to brew your own beer, but thought it would be too hard, or too expensive, you've got to read Mike's book. Mike tells you where you can get the equipment and ingredients. The process is easy to follow, with color photos and step-by-step instructions.

I've personally sampled two of his recipes, and found them to be excellent. Even if you don't drink beer, you might consider that a man who knows how to make beer will always have something to trade.

I think you'll find this book well worth the price, and buying it here helps support the Lawful Path. Thanks for helping us keep the lights on.

October 8th: I received an email today from someone I'll call MKP, who took issue with our sidebar entitled, Some Statistics on Guns and Doctors. MKP writes:

Dear Editor,

My response to this post that's going around...

Alright... Except that the premise of this whole thing is fallacious as many that come under a physician's care are already injured and perhaps in life-threatening situations. Secondly, let's not remember that physician's negative impact must also be measured against the amount of positive impact they have had. And for many other reasons. But I'm commenting mostly to correct the maths here because it ticks me off. I'm not commenting on the political nature of gun control...

  1. Except for the fact that the information is wrong and there were 850,085 physicians in 2010 Comparing Physicians to guns is not a comparable measure. Physicians perform a task, they are not an object. If you wanted to have an accurate comparison you should compare the number of patient's records from all physicians as a baseline measure. That number is 1.2 billion. [url][/url]
  2. I have found no reliable number that would about to that 120,000 mentioned. The CDC, which keeps all sorts of medical statistics in the U.S. cites 93,951 deaths in 2010.

    The only deaths that can be directly attributed to doctors [editor: stray sentence?]

  3. Using the "accidental" gun death ratio is ridiculous and the entire figure should be used. Doctors are meant to save lives, hence why you count the accidental deaths. Guns are meant to kill people. In that case, you should also count the fact that two-thirds of all gun-related deaths in the United States are suicides. In 2010, there were 19,392 firearm-related suicide deaths, and 11,078 firearm-related homicide deaths in the United States.
  4. I have found no indication that there are 80 million gun owners in the U.S.. I thus wonder where that figure comes from, especially because gun owners (I think) are measured by household, and there is no reliable source. The NRA however estimates that there are about 70-80 million, so I'll take that figure as good.


30470 deaths per year (2010) and the current number of gun owners (let's assume it's 80 million) gives us 0.0003809 as number of deaths per gun owner per year.or 0.038%

1.2 billion "operations" by licenced physicians (850,085) and the supposed 120,000 deaths per year make out to 0.00001, or 0.001%. In reality the CDC actually gives the correct figure as 93,591, which would readjust the figure to 0.0000078, or 0.00078%.

It turns out that Guns, in any case, are quite much deadlier than Physicians...


Dear MKP,

Thanks for your letter. I agree that statistics can be, and usually are, manipulated toward whatever bias their user is bent on advocating. This goes for people on both sides of the fence, and for any issue.

This particular use of statistics has apparently gored your ox (are you a doctor?). From my perspective, the fact you have spent so much time with the figures, means you are thinking.

We don't claim to have all the answers, but we do try to get people to think.

There are many different ways to approach the statistics of death, when comparing guns and doctors.

As you pointed out, why not include all causes of gun related death, instead of only accidental? While we're at it, why not include all types of guns, including heavy military weapons? For instance, why not include the large-caliber guns aboard warships? They are, after all, guns. Most warships have their own ship's doctor. If any one of a warship's guns can't kill more people than its ship's doctor, then the gunner should be replaced.

We also might be remiss in taking a too narrow view on doctors. As long as guns have existed, people have made zipguns out of things just laying around the house; and now anyone with a 3D printer can make his own gun with plans obtained freely from the Internet. So why should we consider only licensed physicians? Shouldn't chiropractors, psychiatrists, homeopaths, and even witchdoctors have their opportunity to influence the result?

Now that America is about to embark on the road to socialized medicine, we must definitely include the bureaucrats who will administer Obamacare. One would think the sheer number of these bureaucrats would skew the results in favor of physicians, but I'm not so sure. Lots of people are dying to find out.

Your signature indicates you are from Italy, which has had socialized medicine since 1978. From what I read, I understand the system is broke, but that's another discussion altogether. Socialization is synonymous with heavy regulation. Guns are also heavily regulated in Italy. Therefore I must assume that if records are even kept with regard to deaths by guns and/or doctors, they cannot be relied upon to be accurate. After all, your press is heavily controlled too.

The best thing you said, if I may paraphrase, is that doctors are people, whereas guns are objects. I agree it's not a fair comparison. It would be better to compare a gun with a physician's scalpel, or with the drugs he prescribes to his patients.

If we can agree it is not the tool which is at fault, but hand which guides it, then let's take a look at the gun control laws being proposed by the federal government, and by many State legislatures.

These laws would propose to curtail, or severely limit private ownership of all kinds of guns. Only agents of government would be allowed their ownership and use. Their line of reasoning is that guns are dangerous, and only government can be trusted with guns. Since we've already established that guns are tools and it is people, not guns which are dangerous, let's examine the second plank, and look at government's track record.

According to recently revised figures compiled by R. J. Rummel (his qualifications, and the full article is at, during the 20th century, governments murdered their own people to the tune of 262,000,000. This does not include any of the people who died in foreign or internal wars. Governments actually murdered more than six times as many of their own people, than all the people who died in war during the same period. This also includes only overt murder, and not "soft-kill" methods such as poisoning water supplies, and approving known poisons for mass consumption.

How is it that governments were able to murder so many of their own people, without the people rising up and fighting back? Because first the government took away their guns.

In most cases, goverment also took away, or severely limited their peoples' access to doctors. This makes it difficult to bring our original discussion back into view, but does suggest that government views both guns and doctors as dangerous. Dangerous to government, at least.

All things considered, I still feel safer owning a gun, than visiting a doctor.

Gregory Allan, Editor

Last Update: April 10, 2014

Revision 2.0

"How to Survive Hospital Costs Without Insurance"

Free Report!

  • Slash existing medical costs by 75% or more, legally!
  • Learn the 3 secret phrases that make collection agents hang up on you, and never call back.
  • Keep your whole family safe from bankruptcy due to unexpected healthcare costs.
  • Never buy insurance! Enjoy security through knowledge, instead.
  • Free manual teaches simple procedures anyone can master.
  • New: Private online forum provides updated information. Access granted upon purchase of full report.

Download now in PDF format:
Free Evaluation Copy

Purchase the full report for only $49.95
Buy it Now

Some Statistics
on Guns and Doctors


  1. The number of physicians in the U.S. is approximately 700,000.
  2. Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are approximately 120,000.
  3. Accidental deaths per physician is 0.1714286.

Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services.


  1. The number of gun owners in the U.S. is approximately 80,000,000. (Yes, that's 80 million)
  2. The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500.
  3. The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is 0.0000188.

Statistics courtesy of FBI.


Doctors are more than 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.

Remember, 'Guns don't kill people, doctors do.'

Almost everyone has at least one doctor.
This means you are over 9,000 times more likely to be killed by a doctor as by a gun owner!!!

Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!!!!!

Out of concern for the public at large, We withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention!

Are you free?

Free. Not subject to legal constraint of another. (Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition)

Demand a Plan

Demand a Plan - Update


The Lawful Path wishes to give thanks and acknowledgment to those who have contributed to this Web site.

  • Gregory Allan, for hosting and this site, and for many of the endless updates. Gregory is an avid student of the law, a two-time participant in Right Way's Frontline Master program, and the former chairman of Christ county, kingdom of God.
  • NetOne Communications, for this fast, efficient, and inexpensive Net access, and for putting up with us taking up more room than we're probably entitled to.
  • Right Way L.A.W., for allowing us to distribute their excellent study materials, and providing us with digital updates of their catalogs.

And mostly, thanks go to our visitors and other contributors, who have, in many ways, made this site a friendly and educational place to visit.

Thank you for your continued support.

About The Lawful Path.

(Isaiah 33:22) For the Lord is our judge, the Lord is our lawgiver, the Lord is our king; he will save us.

The Lawful Path     -

Copyright 1996, 2014, by Gregory Allan; All rights reserved.